Oswald Balzer versus Theodor Mommsen – polityczne emocje z historią w tle. Nowa ocean sporu

Słowa kluczowe


Jak cytować

Słapek, D. (2012). Oswald Balzer versus Theodor Mommsen – polityczne emocje z historią w tle. Nowa ocean sporu. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, (5), 99–143. Pobrano z https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/seg/article/view/2519


There is a prominent tendency in the abundant literature concerning Th. Mommsen to portray him as an active, valued liberal politician of the second half of the 19th  century. In this context, relatively little is said about his appeal to the Sudeten Germans of 1897 who faced the so-called Badenischen Sprachenverordnungen. The letter of the German scholar, published in the Viennese press, included many violently unjust accusations, especially against the Czechs. In the storm of polemics and discussions unleashed by the text, the voice of the Polish historian of law, Oswald Balzer, was probably the loudest.  His open letter, defending the civilisational achievements of the Slavs, never received Mommsen’s response. Nonetheless, in the awareness of Poles and Czechs in particular the Berlin historian became their confirmed enemy. German science, making light of the event, puts it down to Mommsen’s unbridled political fervour, which made him speak out in public even in those matters of which he had little knowledge.  It admits, however, that the episode with pure nationalism looming in the background is a certain flaw on Mommsen’s idealized image of an ever valid role-model of a liberal politician. The view is admissible, although one may be surprised at the implied ignorance of Mommsen’s especially with regard to the Sudeten Germans, to whom the language laws introduced by Count Badeni’s government were to apply, and which he knew well from his native Schleswig.  As to the negligible knowledge Mommsen had of the Slavs, the views conveyed by Croatian Slavist  V. Jagić may be convincing to some extent, although it is worth remembering that Mommsen (a person perfectly conversant with the nuances of world politics!) needed no profound academic knowledge to formulate general (remote from scientific inquiry) views about the Czechs.   It is likely that when attacking Slavs, he drew upon the stereotypes which circulated at the time (he was not entirely independent in his opinions about Poles, remaining under the influence of M. Weber), supported by more readily definable personal views on the role of the Church and Catholicism, or the frontiers of the German state. Mommsen probably never formulated his convictions concerning Poles and the Polish issue of the turn of the 19th and 20th  centuries in a consistent, logical statement. In the Polish press before 1897 he had not been treated as a declared enemy of Polishness and even his adversary, Balzer emphasised Mommsen’s former objectivity. It appears it was theLvov law historian who lacked objectivity. His disputatious character, apparently combined with the a fairly unpleasant memory of studies inBerlin  (personal encounter with the demanding Mommsen) materialised in a polemic manifesto, in which, with a characteristic fluency, large dose of emotion and patriotic throes (although resorting to the standard historical argumentation of the time), the author drew a fairly unequivocal, anti-Polish image of Mommsen. This view persisted as long as 1918, although the admirers of Balzer’s views maintained it long after the death of both adversaries. 




Balzer O., List otwarty do dra Theodora Mommsena, profesora Uniwersytetu Berlińskiego z powodu jego odezwy „An die Deutschen in Oesterreich”, Słowo Polskie 272, 1897, s. 1–2.

Barth T., Theodor Mommsen, Die Nation 1903, s. 82–85.

Bowersock G.W., Momigliano’s Quest for the Person, History and Theory 30, 4, 30, 1991, s. 27–36.

Calder W.M. III, D.J. Keamer, An Introductory Bibliography to History of Classical Scholarship Chiefly in the XIXth and XXth Centuries, Hildesheim 1992.

Calder W.M. III, R. Scott Smith, A Supplementary Bibliography to the History of Classical Scholarschip Chiefly in the XIXth and XXth Centuries, Bari 2000.

Calder W.M. III, Research Opportunities in the Modern History of Classical Scholarship, The Classical World 74, 5, 1981, s. 241–251.

Christ K., Römische Geschichte und deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft, München 1982.

Christ K., Theodor Mommsen und sein Biograph, Historische Zeitschrift 233, 1981, s. 363–370.

Dąbkowski P., Oswald Balzer. Życie i dzieła, Lwów 1934, s. 18n.

Dressel H., Nekrologe (Theodor Mommsen), Zeitschrift für Numismatik 24, 1904, s. 367–376.

Drozdowski M., Jarochowski K., [w:] J. Strzelczyk (red.), Wybitni historycy wielkopolscy, Poznań 1989, s. 90–103.

Gudeman A., Theodor Mommsen, The New York Latin Leaflet 4, 89, 1903, s. 1–2.

Hartmannn L.M., Theodor Mommsen. Eine biographische Skizze, Gotha 1908.

Haverfield F., Theodor Mommsen, The English Historical Review 19, 73, 1904, s. 80–89.

Heuss A., Theodor Mommsen über sich selbst. Zur Testamentsklausel von 1899, Antike und Abendland. Beiträge zum Verständnis der Griechen und Römer und ihres Nachlebens 6, 1957, s. 105–117.

Jaroszewicz-Kleidinst B., Z czeskich ech wystąpienia O. Balzera przeciwko T. Mommsenowi, Ze Skarbca Kultury 14, 1962, s. 81–87.

Kaenel H.-M., Alföldi M.R. et al. (red.), Geldgeschichte vs. Numismatik. Theodor Mommsen und die antike Münze. Kolloquium aus Anlaß des 100. Todesjahres von Theodor Mommsen (1817–1903) an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Mai 2003, Berlin 2004.

Kałążny J. (opr.), Opowiadanie historii w niemieckiej refl eksji teoretycznohistorycznej i literaturoznawczej od oświecenia do współczesności, Poznań 2003, s. 438.

Kelsey F.W., Theodor Mommsen, The Classical Journal 14, 4, 1919, s. 224–236.

Kloft H., Die Nachrufe auf Theodor Mommsen, [w:] A. Demandt, A. Goltz, H. Schlange-Schöningen (red.), Theodor Mommsen. Wissenschaft und Politik im 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin, New York 2005, s. 282–317.

Kozłowski J., Niemcy w Poznańskiem wobec Wiosny Ludów 1848–1850, Poznań 2009, s. 69–129.

Łazuga W., „Rządy polskie” w Austrii: gabinet Kazimierza hr. Badeniego, 1895–1897, Poznań 1991, s. 187nn, 234.

Łukasiewicz D., Nowe badania nad polsko-niemieckim stereotypem etnicznym na przełomie XVIII/XIX wieku w krytycznym świetle, Kwartalnik Historyczny 86, 1, 1995, s. 87nn.

Mattenklott G., Mommsens Prosa — Historiographie als Literatur, [w:] A. Demandt, A. Goltz, H. Schlange-Schöningen (red.), Theodor Mommsen, s. 163–180.

Molik W., Polskie peregrynacje uniwersyteckie do Niemiec (1871–1914), Poznań 1989, s. 203–228.

Mommsen Th., Römische Kaisergeschichte: Nach den Vorlesungs-Mitschriften von Sebastian und Paul Hensel 1882/86, opr. A. i B. Demandt, München 1992.

Murray O., Arnaldo Momigliano in England, History and Theory 30, 4, 30, 1991, s. 49–64.

Nowacki R., Oswald Balzer (1858–1933), Opole 1998, s. 197–207.

Nowacki R., Oswald Balzer jako polemista, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Opolskiego. Historia 32, 1996, s. 49–63.

Pasquali G., Il testamento di Teodoro Mommsen, Rivista storica italiana 61, 1949, s. 337–350.

Pol K., Poczet prawników polskich, Warszawa 2000, s. 501nn.

Pyter M., Oswald Balzer i lwowska szkoła historyczno-prawna, Lublin 2010, s. 29n, 110–112, 333–335.

Rebenich S., Theodor Mommsen als Schrift steller. Ein Verzeichnis seiner Schriften von Karl Zangemeister, Hildesheim 2000.

Schlange-Schöningen H., Ein „goldener Lorbeerkranz” für die ‘Römische Geschichte’. Theodor Mommsens Nobelpreis für Literatur, [w:] J. Wiesehöfer (red.), Th eodor Mommsen: Gelehrter, Politiker und Literat, Stuttgart 2005, s. 207–228.

Solin H., Di Donato F. (red.), Identita e culture del Sannio. Storia, epigrafia e archeologia a Venafro e nella alta valle del Volturno. Atti del Congresso Internazionale in ricordo di Theodor Mommsen a cento anni dalla morte (1903–2003), Benevento 2007.

Storm T., Briefwechsel mit Theodor Mommsen. Mit einem Anhang: Theodor Storms Korrespondenzen für die Schleswig-Holsteinische Zeitung 1848.

Wągiel P., Theodor Mommsen (1817–1903), Okolice 2, 1987, s. 5–18.

Weber W., Theodor Mommsen. Zum Gedächtnis seines 25. Todestages, Stuttgart 1929.

Wickert L., Th. Mommsen — O. Jahn. Briefwechsel, 1842–1868, Frankfurt a. M. 1962.

Wickert L., Theodor Mommsen. Eine Biographie. Lehjahre (1817–1844), Frankfurt a. M. 1959.

Wojciechowski Z., Oswald Balzer, Kwartalnik Historyczny 57, 4, 1933, s. 321–444.

Zangemeister K., Theodor Mommsen als Schriftsteller. Ein Verzeichnis seiner Schrift en, Berlin 1905.

Zieliński T., Autobiografia. Dziennik 1939–1944, opr. H. Geremek, P. Mitzner, Warszawa 2005, s. 45, 65n, 79, 81, 127.


Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.