A person-centred perspective on agency in language learning: insights from a pilot study
Journal cover Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, volume 25, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

foreign language learning
person-centredness
agency
self-efficacy
intention
self-regulation
language coaching

How to Cite

Przybył, J., Gorąca-Sawczyk, G., Sagermann Bustinza, L., & Bieniecka-Drzymała, K. (2025). A person-centred perspective on agency in language learning: insights from a pilot study. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, 25, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2025.25.10

Abstract

This pilot study investigates key components of language learner agency, including intentionality, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. It relies on insights from a group of foreign language majors seeking learning support at Studio KOUCZ. Drawing on a theoretical framework grounded in the psychology of language learning, the study explores participants’ perceived competence in directing and managing their own language learning process. Data was collected from 28 university students using a Polish adaptation of the Agency for Learning Questionnaire Short Form (AFLQ-S, Code 2020), and analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric comparisons. The results reveal relatively high levels of intentionality and self-efficacy, alongside critically low levels of self-regulation. These findings point to specific areas for targeted intervention and suggest that even highly motivated and self-aware learners may lack sufficient strategies for managing their learning process and academic stress. The discussion highlights the importance of personalised coaching and metacognitive support in fostering learners’ self-regulation. The study contributes to the emerging literature on learner agency in foreign language education and provides practical insights for institutional support mechanisms aimed at empowering students in higher education contexts.

https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2025.25.10
PDF

References

Andrews, J., & Munro, C. (2018). Coaching for agency: The power of professionally respectful dialogue. In D. M. Netolicky, J. Andrews, & C. Paterson (Eds.), Flip the system Australia: What matters in education (pp. 163–171). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429620-24

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Bandura, A. (1999). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.). The self in social psychology (pp. 285–297). Psychology Press.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Bieniecka-Drzymała, K. (2024). Entwicklung der metakognitiven Bewusstheit und Autonomisierung im Coachingdialog mit Fremdsprachenstudierenden. Vom Action Research zur qualitativen Evaluationsforschung. In K. Siebold, M. Lazovic, E. Knopp, S. Jentges, L. Ciepielewska-Kaczmarek, S. Adamczak-Krysztofowicz (Eds.), Empirische Unterrichtsforschung in DaFS:Unterrichtsplannung, -durchfuhrung, und -evaluation (pp. 117–132). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1

Brandt, W.C. (2024). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on student agency. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. https://www.nciea.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Student-Agency-Report-Final.pdf

Brod, G., Kucirkova, N., Shepherd, J. & Jolles, D. (2023). Agency in Educational Technology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Implications for Learning Design. Educational Psychology Review, 35(25), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09749-x

Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2022). Personality: Theory and research. John Wiley & Sons.

Chen, M. (2025). Student Agency in Foreign Language Learning: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 15(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2025.03.015

Code, J. (2020). Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

Cottrell, S. (2015). The Study Skills Handbook (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031201

Crowhurst, P., & Cornish, L. (2020). Factors in agency development: A supervisory teaching perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(9), 24–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n9.2

Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 236–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw055

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, 36(3), 9–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.30945943.5

Driver, P., Larsen-Freeman, D., Gao, X., & Mercer, S. (2021). Learner agency: Maximising learner potential. Oxford University Press.

Goetze, J., & Driver, M. (2022). Is learning really just believing? A meta-analysis of self-efficacy and achievement in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 233–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.4

Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning – what it is and what it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679

Greene, J. A. (2017). Self-regulation in education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537450

Duckworth, A. L., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611758

Kovács, G. (2022). A comprehensive language coaching handbook: theory and practice. Pavilion Publishing.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188414

Mairitsch, A., Sulis, G., Mercer, S., & Bauer, D. (2023). Putting the social into learner agency: Understanding social relationships and affordances. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102214

Maretha, A. L., & Waluyo, B. (2022). Profiles, differences, and roles of learners’ agency in English learning in Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 543–564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15230a

Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001

Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41–59.

OECD (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. Student Agency for 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/Student_Agency_for_2030_concept_note.pdf

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146

Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2020). The big five in SLA. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59324-7

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Przybył, J. (2023). The effects of strategic instruction on self-regulated language learning. XLinguae 17, 168–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2023.16.02.13

Przybył, J. (2025). The impact of a communicative-metacognitive intervention on linguistic majors’ self-actualisation. Psychology of Language and Communication, 29, 225–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0010

Przybył, J., & Chudak, S. (2022a). University students’ self-regulation in standard and enforced online language learning. Moderna Språk, 116(1), 47–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6925

Przybył, J., & Chudak, S. (2022b). The psychological construct of self-regulation in investigating foreign language learners in standard and online educational settings: Conclusions from a pilot study. In M. Pieklarz-Thien & S. Chudak (Eds.), Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog in der Forschung zum Lehren und Lernen fremder Sprachen (pp. 171–189). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737013789.171

Przybył, J., & Chudak, S. (2024). Challenges to selfregulation in enforced online language learn- ing: The results of a qualitative investigation. In M. PieklarzThien, S. Chudak, & J. Przybył (Eds.), Forschungsgegenstände und ihre Verwendungsfelder: Exkurse zur Erforschung des Lehrens und Lernens fremder Sprachen II (pp. 193–214).

In M. Pieklarz-Thien, S. Chudak, & J. Przybył (Eds.), Forschungsgegenstände und ihre Verwend- ungsfelder: Exkurse zur Erforschung des Lehrens und Lernens fremder Sprachen II (pp.–). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Przybył, J., & Urbańska, J. (2020). Language learning strategies and self-regulation: Companions or competitors? In: S. Chudak & M. Pieklarz-Thien (Eds.) Der Lernende im Zentrum der Forschung der gegenwärtigen Fremdsprachendidaktik, 117–136.

Raoofi, S., Tan, B.H., & Chan, S.H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning con- texts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p60

Sağlam, D., & Arslan, A. (2018). The development of English language skills self-efficacy scale for higher education students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 7(2), 1–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1252951.pdf

Seker, M. (2015). The role of self-regulation in promoting learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 69(4), 600–602.

Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874

The jamovi project. (2023). jamovi (Version 2.x) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https:// www.jamovi.org

Vyshnevska, M. (2024). The problem of students’ agency in foreign language learning for economics majors. Collection of Scientific Papers «ΛΌГOΣ», 210–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-19.07.2024.040

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7