Photojournalism in Central Europe: on authenticity and ethics

Main Article Content

Filip Láb
Sandra Štefaniková
Martina Topinková

Abstrakt

The development of the Internet and digital technology by the end of the twentieth century has raised serious disputes about ethics, authenticity and photo manipulation. These concerns are especially relevant in the field of photojournalism in the news media, where credibility matters the most. In this paper we described the current situation in relation to image authenticity and professional ethics in three countries of Central Europe – the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. We asked research questions regarding photo production, circumstances of photographing, image content, technical improvements, manipulation, ethical standards and responsibility. Our findings reveal a complexity of ethical issues related to working with visual news material. During the fieldwork we conducted 65 in-depth interviews and surveys with full-time and freelance photojournalists and photo editors working for printed and online newspapers and opinion magazines in Central Europe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Láb, F., Štefaniková, S., & Topinková, M. (2019). Photojournalism in Central Europe: on authenticity and ethics. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, (2), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2016.2.5
Dział
Articles

Bibliografia

  1. Andén-Papadopoulos K. (2008), The Abu Ghraib torture photographs. News frames, visual culture, and the power of images, “Journalism”, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–30.
  2. Barthes R. (1981), Camera Lucida, Hill and Wang, New York.
  3. Brennen B. (2010), Photojournalism: historical dimensions to contemporary debates, in: The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, ed. S. Allan, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 71–82.
  4. Cartier-Bresson H. (1952), The Decisive Moment, Simon and Schuster, France.
  5. Fahmy S., Bock M. A., Wanta W. (2014), Visual communication theory and research. A mass Communication Perspective, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  6. Fahmy S., Fosdick S. B., Johnson T. J. (2005), Is Seeing Believing? A Survey of Magazine Professionals’ Practices and Attitudes Towards Ethical Standards for Photographs, “The Journal of Magazine and New Media Research”, Scholarworks.sjsu.edu, http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=journ_masscomm_pub, 07.01.2016.
  7. Fahmy S., Johnson T. J. (2005), ‘How we performed’: embedded journalists’ attitudes and perceptions towards covering the Iraq war, “Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly”, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 301–317.
  8. Galtung J., Ruge M.-H. (1965), The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers, “Journal of Peace Research”, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 64–90.
  9. Gaskell G. (2000), Individual and Group Interviewing, in: Qualitative Researching with Text, Images and Sound: A Practical Handbook, eds. M. W. Bauer, G. Gaskell, Routledge, New York, pp. 38–56.
  10. Gladney G. A., Ehrlich M. C. (1994), Cross-Media Response to Digital Manipulation of the Still and Moving Images, “Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (77th, Atlanta, Georgia, August 10–13, 1994). Part V: Media and Technology,” August1994, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED376528.pdf, 07.01.2016.
  11. Greer J. D., Gosen J. D. (2002), How much is too much? Assessing levels of digital alteration as factors in public perception of news media credibility, “News Photographer”, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 4–13.
  12. Hadland A., Campbell D., Lambert P. (2015), The State of News Photography: The Lives and Livelihoods of Photojournalists in the Digital Age, Reuters Institute Report, http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/state-newsphotography-lives-and-livelihoods-photojournalists-digital-age, 12 October 2015.
  13. Johnstone J. W. C., Slawski E. J., Bowman W. W. (1976), The news people: A sociological portrait of American journalists and their work, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  14. Kim U. S., Kelly J. D. (2010) Public Reactions toward an Ethical Dilemma Faced by Photojournalists: Examining the Conflict between Acting as a Dispassionate Observer and Acting as a “Good Samaritan”, “Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly”, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 23–40.
  15. Kobré K., Brill B. (2006), Photojournalism: the professionals’ approach, 6th ed. Press, Amsterdam.
  16. Kodeks Etyki Dziennikarskiej SDP, Stowarzyszenie Dziennikarzy Polskich, http://sdp.pl/s/kodeks-etyki-dziennikarskiej-sdp, 07.01.2016.
  17. Láb F., Lábová A. (2009), Soumrak fotožurnalismu?, Karolinum, Praha.
  18. Láb F., Turek P. (2009), Fotografie po fotografii, Karolinum, Praha.
  19. Lester P. M. (1991), Photojournalism: An Ethical Approach, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  20. Langton L. (2009), Photojournalism and today’s news, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  21. Newton J. H. (2009), Photojournalism Ethics: A 21st-Century Primal Dance of Behaviour, Technology and Ideology, in: The handbook of Mass Media Ethics, eds.L. Welkins, G. C. Clifford, Routledge, New York.
  22. Parry K. (2010), A visual framing analysis of British press photography during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, “Media, War & Conflict”, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 67–85.
  23. Patching R., Hirst M. (2013), Journalism ethics: arguments and cases for the twentyfirst century, Routledge, London.
  24. Potter W. J., Smith S. (2000), The context of graphic portrayals of television violence, “Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media”, vol. 44, pp. 301–323.
  25. Reaves S. (1991), Digital Alteration of Photographs in Consumer Magazines, “Journal of Mass Media Ethics”, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 175–181.
  26. Reaves S. (1995), The vulnerable image: Categories of photos as predictor of digital manipulation, “Journalism”, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 706–715.
  27. Ritchin F. (2013), Bending the Frame. Photojournalism, Documentary, and the Citizen, Aperture.
  28. Robertson J. (2004), Images of war, “American journalism review”, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 44–51.
  29. Saldaña J. (2013), The coding manual for qualitative researchers, Sage, Los Angeles.
  30. Sontag S. (2003), Regarding pain of the others, Penguin, London.
  31. Wheeler T. (2002), Phototruth or photofiction? Ethics and Media Imagery in the Digital Age, Routledge, New York.
  32. Wheeler T., Gleason T. (1995), Photography or photofiction: An ethical protocol for the digital age, “Visual Communication Quarterly”, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 8–12.