Słowa kluczowe
jakość instytucji państwa
Rosja
Ukraina
Europejski Sondaż Wartości
Światowy Sondaż Wartości
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Celem artykułu była weryfikacja założenia o związku pomiędzy jakością instytucji państwa a zaufaniem instytucjonalnym w Rosji i na Ukrainie. Cel ten realizowano w dwóch etapach. Po pierwsze, na podstawie danych Europejskiego Sondażu Wartości (European Value Survey) oraz w oparciu o wskaźniki makrospołeczne i makrogospodarcze, wyznaczono miejsce Rosji i Ukrainy w europejskim rankingu zaufania instytucjonalnego (dane sondażowe) oraz w rankingu jakości instytucji państwowych (wskaźniki makro). Dodatkowo, w oparciu o dane zagregowane na poziomie poszczególnych krajów, sprawdzono siłę związku pomiędzy pozycjami tych krajów w obu rankingach. Po drugie, wykorzystując dane Światowego Sondażu Wartości (World Value Survey) testowano zależności pomiędzy indywidualnymi, subiektywnymi ocenami społecznych i politycznych efektów funkcjonowania państwa, a zaufaniem instytucjonalnym w Rosji i na Ukrainie. W oparciu o przeprowadzoną analizę sformułowano kilka konkluzji. Po pierwsze, pod względem jakości instytucji państwa Rosja i Ukraina uplasowały się na ostatnich pozycjach w Europie. Po drugie, o ile Ukraina zajęła adekwatną lokatę pod względem zaufania instytucjonalnego, o tyle pozycja Rosji była niewspółmiernie wysoka. Po trzecie, w obu krajach subiektywne oceny efektów działania instytucji okazały się istotnymi predyktorami zaufania instytucjonalnego, aczkolwiek ich siła predykcyjna była wyższa wśród Ukraińców niż wśród Rosjan.
Bibliografia
Alesina A., Baqir R., Easterly W. (1999), Public goods and ethnic divisions, „Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 114, nr 4.
Aslund A. (2007), How CapitalismWas Built. The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Baier A. (1986), Trust and Antitrust, „Ethics”, vol. 96, nr 2.
Berg L., Hjerm M. (2010), National Identity and Political Trust, „Perspectives on European Politics and Society”, vol. 11, nr 4.
Brehm J., Wendy R. (1997), Individual-Level Evidence For The Causes And Consequences of Social Capital, „American Journal of Political Science”, vol. 41, nr 3.
Brzeziński Z. (1994), The Premature Partnership, „Foreign Affairs”, vol. 73, nr 2.
Burlyuk O. (2015), The Introduction and Consolidation of the Rule of Law in Ukraine: Domestic Hindrances at the Level of the Demand for Law, „Hague Journal on the Rule of Law”, vol. 7, nr 1.
Cook T. E., Gronke P. (2001), The Dimensions of Institutional Trust: How Distinct is Public Confidence in the Media?, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Cook K. S., Hardin R., Levi M. (2005), Cooperation Without Trust?, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
D’Anieri P. (2019), Ukraine and Russia. From Civilized Divorce to Uncivil War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
D’Anieri P., Kravchuk R., Kuzio T. (2018), Politics and Society in Ukraine, Routledge, New York.
Darden K. A. (2001), Blackmail as a Tool of State Domination: Ukraine under Kuchma, „East European Constitutional Review”, vol. 10, nr 2/3.
Delhey J., Newton K. (2005), Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?, „European Sociological Review”, vol. 21, nr 4.
Dunn J. R. (1993), ‘Trust’, w: A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, red. R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, Blackwell, Oxford.
Erikson E. H. (1977), Childhood and Society, Paladin Grafton Books, London.
Easterly W. (2001), Can Institutions Resolve Ethnic Conflict?, „Economic Development and Cultural Change”, vol. 49, nr 4.
EIU. The Economists Intelligence Unit (2019), Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy, https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Democracy2018, 7.04.2021.
EVS (2020), European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017), GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7500 Data file Version 4.0.0.
Forsal (2022), Ilu uchodźców z Ukrainy jest w Polsce?, https://forsal.pl/swiat/aktualnosci/artykuly/8366607,ukraina-liczba-uchodzcow-w-polsce-najnowsze-dane.html, 28.04.2022.
Freitag M., Bühlmann M. (2009), Crafting Trust. The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective, „Comparative Political Studies”, vol. 42, nr 12.
Fukuyama F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, The Free Press, New York.
Harding L. (2011), Mafia state. How One Reporter Became an Enemy of the Brutal New Russia, Guardian Books, London.
Hooghe M., Dassonneville R., Marien S. (2015), The Impact of Education on the Development of Political Trust: Results from a Five-Year Panel Study among Late Adolescents and Young Adults in Belgium, „Political Studies”, vol. 63, nr 1.
Giddens A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Godefroidt A., Langer A., Meuleman B. (2017), Developing Political Trust in a Developing Country: The Impact of Institutional and Cultural Factors on Political Trust in Ghana, „Democratization”, vol. 24, nr 6.
Haerpfer C., Inglehart R., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E., Puranen B. (red.) (2022), World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 3.0, JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat, Madrid, Spain–Vienna, Austria.
Hardin R. (2002), Trust and Trustworthiness, The Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Hwang I. D. (2017), Which Type of Trust Matters?: Interpersonal vs. Institutional vs. Political Trust, Bank of Korea WP 2017–2015.
Inglehart R. (1999), Trust, Well-being and Democracy’, w: Democracy and Trust, red. M. E. Warren, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index (2018), Measuring Peace in a Complex World. Sydney, http://visionofhumanity.org/reports, 7.04.2021.
Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2010), The Worldwide Governance Indicators: a Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5430.
Kavanagh J., Carman K. G., DeYoreo M., Chandler N., Davis L. E. (2020), The Drivers of Institutional Trust and Distrust: Exploring Components of Trustworthiness, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Knack S., Keefer Ph. (1997), Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation, „Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 112, nr 4.
Kukuła K. (1999), Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej na tle wybranych metod normowania cech diagnostycznych, „Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis”, nr 4.
Kumlin S., Rothstein B. (2005), Making and Breaking Social Capital. The Impact of Welfare State Institutions, „Comparative Political Studies”, vol. 38, nr 4.
Kuzio T. (2015), Ukraine. Democratization, Corruption, and the New Russian Imperialism, Praeger, Santa Barbara.
Kuzio T. (2018), Russian and Ukrainian elites: A comparative study of different identities and alternative transitions, „Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, vol. 51, nr 4.
Lapshyna I., Düvell F. (2018), We Can Only Dream about Europe. Perceptions of Social Policy as a Driver of Migration Aspirations. The Case of Ukraine, „The Journal of Social Policy Studies”, vol. 16, nr 4.
Ledeneva A. V. (2013), Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks, and Informal Governance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levada Center (2015), Pride & Patriotism, https://www.levada.ru/eng/pride-patriotism, 20.04.2022.
Levada Center (2022), Indicators, https://www.levada.ru/en/ratings/, 20.04.2022.
Levi M. (1998), A State of Trust, w: Trust and Governance, red. V. Braithwaite, M. Levi, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Levi M., Stoker L. (2000), Political Trust and Trustworthiness, „Annual Review of Political Science”, vol. 3.
Levitsky S., Way L. A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levitsky S., Way L. A. (2010), The New Competitive Authoritarianism, „Journal of Democracy”, vol. 31, nr 1.
Lin N. (2004), Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lipman M. (2009), Media Manipulation and Political Control in Russia, Chatham House, London.
Lipman M., Kachkaeva A., Poyker M. (2018), Media in Russia: Between Modernization and Monopoly, w: Information, Politics, and Policy in Putin’s Russia, red. D. Treisman, The Brookings Institutions, Washington.
Luhmann N. (1979), Trust and Power, John Wiley, New York.
Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman D. F. (2005), An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 20, nr 3.
McKnight H. D., Chervany N. L. (2001), Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time, w: Trust in Cyber-societies. Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, red. R. Falcone, M. Singh, Y.-H. Tan, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg.
Mishler W., Rose R. (2005), What Are the Political Consequences of Trust? A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia, „Comparative Political Studies”, vol. 38, nr 9.
Naim M. (2012), Mafia States: Organized Crime Takes Office, „Foreign Affairs”, vol. 91, nr 3.
Newton K., Norris P. (2000), Confidence In Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, Or Performance?, w: Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, red. S. Pharr, R. D. Putnam, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
North D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York.
Offe C. (1999), How Can we Trust Our Fellow Citizens?, w: Democracy and Trust, red. M. E. Warren, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Onuch O., Hale H. E. (2018), Capturing ethnicity: the case of Ukraine, „Post-Soviet Affairs”, vol. 34, nr 2–3.
Pavlovsky G. (2016), Russian Politics under Putin: The System Will Outlast the Master, „Foreign Affairs”, vol. 95, nr 3.
Paxton P. (2002), Social Capital and Democracy: an Interdependent Relationship, „American Sociological Review”, vol. 67, nr 2.
Pipes R. (2004), Flight from Freedom: What Russians Think and Want, „Foreign Affairs”, vol. 83, nr 3.
Pomerantsev P. (2014), How Putin Is Reinventing Warfare, „Foreign Policy”, nr 5.
Putnam R. D., Leonardi R, Nonetti R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Rieber A. J. (2007), How Persistent Are Persistent Factors?, w: Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, red. R Legvold, Columbia University Press, New York.
Rogov K., Ananyev M. (2018), Public Opinion and Russian Politics, w: Information, Politics, and Policy in Putin’s Russia, red. D. Treisman, The Brookings Institutions, Washington.
Rothstein B. (2000), Trust, Social Dilemmas and Collective Memories, „Journal of Theoretical Politics”, vol. 12, nr 4.
Rothstein B., Stolle D. (2008), Political Institutions and Generalized Trust, w: Handbook of Social Capital, red. D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, G. Wolleb, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rothstein B., Uslaner E. M. (2005), All for All. Equality, Corruption and Social Trust, „World Politics”, vol. 58, nr 1.
Ryabov A. (2011), No Institutions. In Bubnova Natalia (ed.) 20 Years Without the Berlin Wall: a Breakthrough to Freedom, Carnegie Moscow Center, Moscow.
Seligman A. B. (2000), The Problem of Trust, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Service R. (2009), A History of Modern Russia. From Tsarism to the Twenty-first Century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Shapiro S. P. (1987), The Social Control of Impersonal Trust, „American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 93, nr 3.
Snyder T. (2018), The Road to Unfreedom. Russia, Europe, America, Tim Duggan Books, New York.
Stoyan A., Niedzwiecki S., Morgan J., Hartly J., Espinal R. (2016), Trust in Government Institutions: The Effects of Performance and Participation in the Dominican Republic and Haiti, „International Political Science Review”, vol. 37, nr 1.
Sumanjeet (2015), Institutions, Transparency, and Economic Growth, „Emerging Economy Studies”, vol. 1, nr 2.
Teorell J., Sundström A., Holmberg S., Rothstein B., Alvarado Pachon N., Mert Dalli C. (2021), The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan21, University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://www.qog.pol.gu.se doi: https://www.doi.org/10.18157/qogstdjan21, 3.03.2022.
Treisman D. (2018), Introduction: Rethinking Putin’s Political Order, w: The New Autocracy. Information, Politics, and Policy in Putin’s Russia, red. D. Treisman, The Brookings Institutions, Washington.
Uslaner E. M. (2002), The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Uslaner E. M. (2005), Trust and corruption, w: The New Institutional Economics of Corruption, red. J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, M. Schramm, Routledge, London.
Van Oorschot W. van, Arts W. (2005), The Social Capital of European Welfare States. The Crowding out Hypothesis Revisited, „Journal of European Social Policy”, vol. 15, nr 1.
Vitvitsky B. (2011), Corruption, Rule of Law and Ukraine, w: Open Ukraine. Changing Course towards a European Future, red. T. Kuzio, D. Hamilton, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC.
Walker E. W. (2015), Between East and West: NATO Enlargement and the Geopolitics of the Ukraine Crisis, w: Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives, red. A. Pikulicka-Wilczewska, R. Sakwa, E-International Relations, Bristol.
Waller M. (2005), Russian politics today. The return of the tradition, Manchester University Press, Manchester–New York.
Ward J. H. Jr. (1963), Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, „Journal of the American Statistical Association”, vol. 58, nr 301.
Way L. (2015), Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Weatherford S. M. (1992), Measuring Political Legitimacy, „American Political Science Review”, vol. 86, nr 1.
World Bank (2018), Gini index (World Bank estimate), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI, 7.04.2021.
Wroe A. (2016), Economic Insecurity and Political Trust in the United States, „American Politics Research”, vol. 44, nr 1.
Licencja
Teksty opublikowane na łamach czasopisma "Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne" i udostępniane w formacie PDF objęte są licencją CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons - Uznanie autorstwa). Kopiowanie i rozpowszechnianie dozwolone jest pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.