Keywords
brak
How to Cite
Rezmer-Płotka, K. (2023). The European Union Safeguards Human Rights and the Ongoing Process of Militant Democracy in the Member States: Book review: Stanisław Adam Paruch, Efektywność ochrony praw człowieka Rady Europy i Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2019, pp. 483. Central European Political Studies, (2). Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssp/article/view/23019
Abstract
brak
Funding
This paper is a result of the research project Contentious Politics and Neo-Militant Democracy. It was financially supported by the National Science Centre, Poland [grant number 2018/31/B/HS5/01410].
References
1) I. Ijabs (2016), After the Referendum: Militant Democracy and Nation-Building in Latvia, “East Europe and Politics and Societies and Cultures” No 2(30). – pp. 288-314.
2) K. Loewenstein (1937) Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I, “The American Political Science Review” No 3(31) pp. 417-432.
3) J. Marszałek-Kawa (2019), The Institutional Position and Functions of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland after the Accession to the European Union, Odessa 2019.
4) G. Molier G., & R. B. Rijpkema (2018) Germany’s New Militant Democracy Regime: National Democratic Party II and the German Federal Constitutional Courts’s ‘Potentiality’ Criterion for Party Bans: Bundesverfassungsgericht, Hudgment of 17 January 2017, 2 BvB 1/13, National Democratic Party II, “European Constitutional Law Review” No 2(14). pp. 394-409.
5) J-W. Müller, Militant Democracy. M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, New York 2012.
2) K. Loewenstein (1937) Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I, “The American Political Science Review” No 3(31) pp. 417-432.
3) J. Marszałek-Kawa (2019), The Institutional Position and Functions of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland after the Accession to the European Union, Odessa 2019.
4) G. Molier G., & R. B. Rijpkema (2018) Germany’s New Militant Democracy Regime: National Democratic Party II and the German Federal Constitutional Courts’s ‘Potentiality’ Criterion for Party Bans: Bundesverfassungsgericht, Hudgment of 17 January 2017, 2 BvB 1/13, National Democratic Party II, “European Constitutional Law Review” No 2(14). pp. 394-409.
5) J-W. Müller, Militant Democracy. M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, New York 2012.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kamila Rezmer-Płotka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in "Central European Political Studies" are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). They may be copied, redistributed and shared only if appropriate credit is given.