Perception of syntactic non-standardness in poetic discourse
Journal cover Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia, volume 14, no. 1, year 2026, title Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

poetic discourse
syntactic non-standardness,
cognitive linguistics
linguistic-aesthetic signs of culture
affective resonance
Tetiana Yakovenko
defamiliarization

How to Cite

Pokhyliuk, O. (2026). Perception of syntactic non-standardness in poetic discourse. Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia, 14(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.14746/sup.2026.14.1.3

Abstract

This article explores the cognitive and communicative parameters of perceiving syntactic non-standardness in contemporary poetic discourse. Using Tetiana Yakovenko’s collection In the Depths of Heavens… (2020) as a primary source, the study identifies how syntactic deviations function as linguistic-aesthetic signs of culture. The research integrates classical theories of style with modern cognitive linguistics, analyzing mechanisms such as “defamiliarization”, cognitive delay, and affective resonance. It is argued that intentional syntactic non-standardness structures a non-canonical communication space, forcing the recipient to transition from linear decoding to deep interpretation. The findings suggest that such deviations transform grammatical structures into intellectual codes, ensuring the continuity of high literary traditions and enhancing the aesthetic impact on the reader.

https://doi.org/10.14746/sup.2026.14.1.3
PDF (Українська)

References

Blohm S., Kraxenberger M., Knoop C.A., Scharinger M., Sound shape and sound effects of literary texts, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645958-002

Gasser A.-M., Form, terminology, and clarity in Aristotle, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2024.

Holikova N., Linhvostylistychna orhanizatsiia suchasnoho ukrainskoho poetychnoho tekstu: znaky kultury, Dnipro: Aktsent PP, 2020.

Kravets L.V., Metafory pryrody v poetychnykh tekstakh M. Rylskoho ta L. Kostenko, „Kultura slova”, 2020, vyp. 92, s. 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37919/0201-419X-2020.92.4

Malenko O.O., Linhvo-estetychna interpretatsiia buttia v ukrainskii poetychnii movotvorchosti (vid folkloru do postmodernu), Kharkiv: Kharkivske istoryko-filolohichne tovarystvo, 2010.

Marina O.S., Kohnityvno-komunikatyvna kharakterystyka anhlomovnoho poetychnoho dyskursu XX–XXI stolit, „Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Filolohiia”, 2015, vyp. 14, s. 179–182.

Moisiienko A.K., Sonetnyi virsh Maksyma Rylskoho: strukturno-kompozytsiina i movno-obrazna orhanizatsiia, „Kultura slova”, 2020, vyp. 92, s. 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37919/0201-419X-2020.92.5

Palash A.O., Typolohiia movno-estetychnykh znakiv kultury v poetyчному dyskursi neoklasykiv, Kyiv: Instytut ukrainskoi movy NAN Ukrainy, 2023.

Shklovskyi V., Mystetstvo yak pryiom, [v:] Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX st., red. M. Zubrytska, Lviv: Litopys, 2002.

Siuta H.M., „Staiu urbanistom, ne mozhu bez mista…” (misto i liudyna v poetychnomu dyskursi XX stolittia), „Kultura slova”, 2021, vyp. 94, s. 57–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37919/0201-419X-2021.94.5

Siuta H.M., Tsytatnyi tezaurus ukrainskoi poetychnoi movy XX stolittia, Kyiv: KMM, 2017.

Volianska Yu.Yu., Typolohichni riznovydy povtoru v suchasnii linhvistychnii dumtsi, [v:] „Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Seriia: Filolohiia. Movoznavstvo”, 2010, vyp. 126, t. 139, s. 187–190.

Xia D., Xu H., Digital tildes (“ ̴ ”) may convey more: analyzing innovative uses of tildes in Chinese WeChat messages, „Language and Semiotic Studies”, 2023, vol. 9, issue 3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0009

Yakovenko T.V., U hlybyni nebes…: poezii. Tvory, Vinnytsia: Tvory, 2020.