Pressto.

Page Header

Noticing grammar in L2 writing and problem-solving strategies

Monika Geist

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.6

Abstract


Noticing plays an important role for second language acquisition. Since the formulation of the output hypothesis (Swain, 1985), it has been proven that producing output can lead to noticing. Studies on noticing have revealed little focus on grammar, and an in-depth investigation of grammar noticing has not been conducted so far. Studies into problemsolving strategies applied to resolve noticing in writing have provided differing classifications. The current study investigates the noticing of ten young learners (15 to 16 years) of L2 English while performing a writing task, with a special focus on grammar. The problem-solving strategies these learners applied are analyzed. With regard to the linguistic areas, results suggest that verb forms, especially the use of modals, and the choice of prepositions, are the main issues encountered in morphology. In syntax, learners mainly dealt with the length of sentences and the ways of connecting clauses. Learners relied on their intuition and existing knowledge, common sense and rephrasing as grammar problem-solving strategies. These results open a new area of study into noticing grammar and suggest some implications for teaching.


Keywords


L2 writing; noticing; output; problem-solving strategies; grammar

Full Text:

References


Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 347-376. doi: 10.1191/1362168803LR127OA

Ammar, A., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2010). Awareness of L1/L2 differences: Does it matter? Language Awareness, 19(2), 129-146. doi: 10.1080/09658411003746612

Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A. (2014). Raising language awareness for learning and teaching L3 grammar. In A. Benati, C. Laval, & M. Arche (Eds.), The grammar dimension in instructed second language learning (pp. 185-207). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Armengol, L., & Cots, J. M. (2009). Attention processes observed in think-aloud protocols: Two multilingual informants writing in two languages. Language Awareness, 18(3/4), 259-276.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.

Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research (1st publ. ed.). New York – Oxon: Routledge.

Cohen, A. D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: Clarifying the issues. CARLA Working Paper Series #3. The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39(1), 81-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x

Dégi, Z. (2010). Effects on the linguistic awareness of foreign language learners. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 2(2), 299-311.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Edstrom, A. (2006). Students as evaluators of writing: Learning from what they notice. Language Awareness, 15(1), 53-57.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353-371.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data. (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Færch, C., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 20-60). London and New York: Longman.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub.

Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 459-479. doi: 10.1177/1362168807080963

Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 332-347.

Heift, T., & Rimrott, A. (2008). Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL. System, 36(2), 196-213.

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102004023

Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 239-278. doi: 10.2307/3587952

Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 421-452.

Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (2010). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Kiely, R. (2009). Observing, noticing, and understanding: two case studies in language awareness in the development of academic literacy. Language Awareness, 18(3/4), 329-344. doi: 10.1080/09658410903197298

Kormos, J. (1999). The effect of speaker variables on the self-correction behavior of L2 learners. System, 27(2), 207-221. doi: 10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00017-2

Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390-403. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003

Lázaro Ibarolla, A. (2009). Reformulation and self-correction: Testing the validity of correction strategies in the classroom. RESLA, 22, 189-215.

Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405-430. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami051

Masny, D. (1997). Linguistic awareness and writing: Exploring the relationship with language awareness. Language Awareness, 6(2-3), 105-118. doi:10.1080/09658416.1997.9959921

Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development. processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 277-303. doi: 10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Shehadeh, A. (2003). Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic knowledge. System, 31(2), 155-171.

Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 557-573. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.x

Song, M.-J., & Suh, B.-R. (2008). The effects of output task types on noticing and learning of the English past counterfactual conditional. System, 36(2), 295-312.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Uggen, M. S. (2012). Reinvestigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62(2), 506-540. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00693.x

Uzawa, K., & Cumming, A. (1989). Writing strategies in Japanese as a foreign language: Lowering or keeping up the standards. Canadian Modern Language Review, 46(1), 178-194.

Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37(1), 82-98.

VOICE Project. (2007). VOICE Transcription Conventions [2.1]. Retrieved from http://www.univie.ac.at/voice/voice.php?page=transcription_general_in formation

Whalen, K., & Ménard, N. (1995). L1 and L2 writers’ strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing. Language Learning, 45(3), 381-418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00447.x

Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583-625.

Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325-340.

Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 321-331.

Zhao, S. Y., & Bitchener, J. (2007). Incidental focus on form in teacher-learner and learner-learner interactions. System, 35(4), 431-447.


Statystyki

Abstract - 36 PDF - 27

Altmetric

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.