Abstrakt
In the proposed article, the author focuses on one of the complexes that make up the content of confrontations, namely the memorial complex, realised through the politics of memory on the part of the state, sometimes on the part of individual institutions of civil society. Historical memory is one of the instruments of influence, sometimes even more effective than solutions aimed at modernity. Memory politics is linked to constructing the past, which is actually alienated from the bearers of this past in order to influence (alienate) the present. The present is re-constructed through the politics of memory. Not surprisingly, it is on the memorial front that the fiercest battles for the present are fought. The confrontation between different collective actors, bearers of different memorial constructs, often turns into a "hot" phase, into a direct clash. Therefore, the phrase "memorial battles" in the title is not so much a literary metaphor as a description. The urban environment, due to its multiculturalism, is a space of confrontation between memorials, which is reflected in the urban landscape. This article considers two main tendencies, seemingly opposite, but in fact being different ways of realising one process - the construction of the history of the past. The text shows that these two tendencies are the construction of memory and cultural displacement.
Bibliografia
Akbulut, Onur, Yakin Ekin. „Tourism potential of battlefields of Balkan wars (1912–1913): A comparison of Turkey and Bulgaria”. Transborder commemoration routes and rituals. Eds. Lina Gergova, Valentin Voskresenski, Yana Gergova. Sofia, Paradigma, 2019, s. 258–275.
Amacher, Korine, Éric Aunoble. „Introduction”. Histoire partagée, mémoires divisées Ukraine, Russie, Pologne. Dir. Korine Amacher, Éric Aunoble, Andrii Portnov. Lausanne, Antipodes, 2021, s. 7–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33056/ANTIPODES.11698
Anderson, Benedict R. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised and extended. ed.). London, Verso, 1991.
Anderson, Kay, Susan J. Smith. „Editorial: Emotional geographies”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26 (1), 2001, s. 7–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00002
Anikin, Daniil, Andrej Linčenko. „Memorial’nye vojny v usloviâh vostočnoevropejskogo frontira: v poiskah metodologii issledovaniâ”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 466, 2021, s. 55–63.
Arhipova, Aleksandra. „Rossijskaâ propaganda: kak sozdat’ vpečatlenie, čto vojny net”. Global Voices, 06.02.2023. Web. 28.06.2023. https://ru.globalvoices.org/2023/02/06/114977/.
Arkhipova, Alexandra, Irina Kozlova, Maria Gavrilova. „Screaming not silence: Grief as a protest and manifestation of loyalty”. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, II (1–2), 2019, s. 82–121.
Assmann, Aleida. „Europe’s divided memory”. Memory and theory in Eastern Europe. Eds. Uilleam Blacker, Alexander Etkind, Julie Fedor. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, s. 25–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322067_2
Baudrillard, Jean. Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe. Paris, Gallimard, 1972.
Bordûgov, Gennadij. „Vojny pamâti” na postsovetskom prostranstve. Moskva, AIRO-HHI, 2011.
Brüggemann, Karsten, Andres Kasekamp. „The politics of history and the «war of monuments» in Estonia”. Nationalities Papers, 36 (3), 2008, s. 425–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990802080646
Burdakova, Olga, Jelena Nõmm. „Narva «wedding sights» as components of the local text”. Nordic and Baltic Studies Review, 4, 2019. https://nbsr.petrsu.ru/journal/article.php?id=1341.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Weaver, Jaap de Wilde. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808
Campbell, Sue. Relational remembering: Rethinking the memory wars. Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9780585482781
Clark, Andy, David J. Chalmers. „The extended mind”. Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings. Ed. David J. Chalmers. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, s. 643–652.
Čurakov, Dmitrij. „Vojny pamâti: otstoât’ pravdu Pobedy”. Gumanitarnye nauki, 1, 2015, s. 7–24.
Davidenko, Aleksei. „The concept of «memory wars» in contemporary studies of collective memory”. Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Humanities and social science, 2022, s. 85–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2022-3-7
De Certeau, Michel. The practice of everyday life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1984.
De Florio, Giulia et al. Raznye vojny: nacional’nye učebniki o Vtoroj mirovoj vojne. Katalog vystavki. Moskva, Meždunarodnyj Memorial, Fond Fridriha Naumana, 2018.
Dmitrieva, Marina. Allotopii. Čužoe i Drugoe v prostranstve vostočnoevropejskogo goroda. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2023.
Dovhopolova, Oksana. „Prospective trends in reformatting regional identities in wartime Ukraine (The case of Odesa)”. Ideology and Politics Journal, 2 (21), 2022a, s. 20–35.
Dovhopolova, Oksana. „The two Russias: A variety turn at the Mariupol Drama Theatre”. 07.07.2022b. Web. 28.06.2023. https://sharethetruths.org/2022/07/07/the-two-russias-avariety-turn-at-the-mariupol-drama-theatre/.
Dullin, Sabine. Uplotnenie granic. K istokam sovetskoj politiki. 1920–1940-e. Per. È. Kustova. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019.
Eglitis, Daina S., Laura Ardava. „The politics of memory: Remembering the Baltic way 20 years after 1989”. Europe-Asia Studies, 64 (6), 2012, s. 1033–1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.691721
Epplee, Nikolaj. Neudobnoe prošloe. Pamât’ o gosudarstvennyh prestupleniâh v Rossii i drugih stranah. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2020.
Gaidai, Oleksandra, Andriy Liubarets. „Leninfall: Elimination of the past as a way of constructing the future (on the materials of Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhye and Kharkov)”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriâ, 2 (16), 2016, s. 28–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2016-2-28-41
Grigorov, Grigor H. „Constructing national territory through ritual”. Transborder commemoration routes and rituals. Eds. Lina Gergova, Valentin Voskresenski, Yana Gergova. Sofia, Paradigma, 2019.
Hobsbawm, Eric, Ranger Terence, eds. The invention of tradition. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Kalinin, Ilya. „The struggle for history: The past as a limited resource”. Memory and theory in Eastern Europe. Eds. Uilleam Blacker, Alexander Etkind, Julie Fedor. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, s. 255–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322067_13
Kappler, Stefanie. „Sarajevo’s ambivalent memory scape: Spatial stories of peace and conflict studies”. Memory Studies, 10 (2), 2017, s. 130–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016650484
Kidron, Carol A. „Being there together: Dark family tourism and the emotive experience of copresence in the Holocaust past”. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 2013, s. 175–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.009
Kidron, Carol A. „Breaching the wall of traumatic silence: Holocaust survivor and descendant person–object relations and the material transmission of the genocidal past”. Journal of Material Culture, 17 (1), 2012, s. 3–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183511432989
Koposov, Nikolay. „Les cultures mémorielles en Europe au miroir des lois sur le passé: une dichotomie «Est-Ouest»?”. Histoire partagée, mémoires divisées Ukraine, Russie, Pologne. Dir.
Korine Amacher, Éric Aunoble, Andrii Portnov. Lausanne, Antipodes, 2021, s. 387–398.
Koposov, Nikolay. Memory laws, memory wars. The politics of the past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304047
Kõresaar, Ene. „The remembrance culture of the Second World War in Estonia as presented in post-Soviet life stories: On the logic of comparison between the Soviet and the Nazi occupations”.
We have something in common: The Baltic memory. Eds. Anneli Mihkelev, Benedikts Kalnačs. Tallinn, Estonian Academy of Sciences, University of Latvia, 2007, s. 37–64.
Kozintsev, Alexander. The mirror of laughter. New Brunswick, NJ, Routledge, 2010.
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, Oxford University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
Law, John. „Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity”. Systems Practice, 5 (4), 1992, s. 379–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Law, John. „Ob’’ekty i prostranstva”. Sociologiâ veŝej. Red. Viktor Vahštajn. Moskva, Territoriâ buduŝego, 2006, s. 223–240.
Malinova, Olga. Konstruirovanie smyslov: Issledovanie simvoličeskoj politiki v sovremennoj Rossii. Moskva, INION RAN. Centr social’nyh nauč.-inform. issled. Otdel polit. nauki, 2013.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Ed. Terrence W. Gordon. Corte Madera, CA, Gingko Press, 2003.
Miller, Aleksej. „Bol’šie peremeny. Čto novogo v politike pamâti i ee izučenii?”. Politika pamâti v sovremennoj Rossii i stranah Vostočnoj Evropy. Aktory, instituty, narrativy. Red. Aleksej Miller, Dmitrij Efremenko. Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta, 2020a, s. 8–24.
Miller, Aleksej. „Vtoraâ mirovaâ vojna v «vojnah pamâti»”. Novoe prošloe, 4, 2020b, s. 222–231.
Moskwa, Dagmara. „The Great Patriotic War in Russian history textbooks”. Sprawy Narodowościowe. Seria nowa, 50, 2018, s. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/sn.1650
Nora, Pierre. Les lieux de mémoire. 1: La République. Paris, Gallimard, 1984.
Nora, Pierre et al. Franciâ-pamât’. Per. Dina Hapaeva. Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo univerisiteta, 1999.
Pääbo, Heiko. „War of memories: Explaining «memorials war» in Estonia”. Baltic Security & Defence Review, 10, 2008, s. 5–28.
Park, Shelley. „Re-viewing the memory wars. Some feminist philosophical reflections”. Fragment by fragment: Feminist perspectives on memory and child sexual abuse. Ed. Margo Rivera. Charlottetown, Gynergy Books, 1999, s. 283–307.
Phillips, Kendall R., G. Mitchell Reyes. „Surveying global memoryscapes: The shifting terrain of public memory studies”. Global memoryscapes: Contesting remembrance in a transnational age. Eds. Kendall R. Phillips, G. Mitchell Reyes. Tuscaloosa, AL, University of Alabama Press, 2011, s. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.30297467.4
Polian, Pavel. Istoriomor, ili Trepanaciâ pamâti. Bitvy za pravdu o GULAGe, deportaciâh, vojne i Holokoste. Moskva, AST, 2016.
Primačenko, Âna. „Sovetskoe vs nacionalističeskoe: protivostoânie diskursov i praktik v postsovetskoj Ukraine”. Studia Universitatis Moldaviae, 10 (110), 2017, s. 267–278.
Santino, Jack. „Performative commemoratives: Spontaneous shrines and the public memorialization of death”. Spontaneous shrines and the public memorialization of death. Ed. Jack Santino. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, s. 5–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12021-2_2
Sergejčik, Elena. „Flag ESSR v centre Tallinna i graffiti na meste narvskogo tanka: iskusstvo ili provokaciâ?”. Postimees, 27.06.2023. Web. 05.10.24. https://rus.postimees.ee/7821267/mnenie-flag-essr-v-centre-tallinna-i-graffiti-na-meste-narvskogo-tanka-iskusstvo-ili-provokaciya.
Sherlock, Thomas. Historical narratives in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia. Destroying the settled past, creating an uncertain future. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604216
Spurina, Maija. Cracks in a narrative of the past: Three case studies of collective memory in post-Soviet Latvia. PhD Thesis. 2017.
Steiner, Linda, Barbie Zelizer. „Competing memories: Reading the past against the grain: The shape of memory studies”. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12 (2), 1995, s. 213–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039509366932
Stone, Don. „Memory wars in the «new Europe»”. The Oxford handbook of postwar European history. Ed. Don Stone. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, s. 714–732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560981.013.0036
Šūpulis, Edmunds. „Baltic identities in quest between the competing memory discourses”. Identities and identifications: Politicized uses of collective identities, 2016. Web. 12.12.2024. https://euroacademia.eu/presentation/baltic-identities-in-quest-between-the-competing-memory-discourses/.
Thien, Deborah. „After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography”. Area, 37 (4), 2005, s. 450–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00643a.x
Thrift, Nigel. „Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect”. Geografiska Annaler Series B, 86, 2004, s. 57–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
Tichindeleanu, Ovidiu. „Decolonizing Eastern Europe: Beyond internal critique”. Performing History, Idea arts + society, Catalogue and Supplement to the Romanian Pavilion of the Venice Biennial. Eds. Bogdan Ghiu, Maria Rus Bojan. 2011. Web. 05.10.2024. https://monoskop.org/images/c/c9/Tichindeleanu_Ovidiu_2011_Decolonizing_Eastern_Europe_Beyond_Internal_Critique.pdf.
Tichindeleanu, Ovidiu. „Towards a critical theory of postcommunism?”. Radical Philosophy, 159, 2010, s. 26–32.
Tichindeleanu, Ovidiu. „Vampires in the living room. A view of what happened to Eastern Europe after 1989, and why real socialism still matters”. Ed. Corinne Kumar. Asking we walk. The South as new political imaginary, Book Three: In the time of the fire, Bangalore, Streelekha 2012, s. 331-346.
Tlostanova, Madina. „Postkolonial’naâ teoriâ, dekolonial’nyj vybor i osvoboždenie èstezisa”. Čelovek i kul’tura, 1, 2012, s. 1–64.
Troitskiy, Sergey. „In search of total order: Solidifying borders and a stable identity”. Journal of Frontier Studies, 6 (1), 2021a, s. 196–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v6i1.279
Troitskiy, Sergey. „Is parody dangerous?”. The European Journal of Humour Research, 9 (2), 2021b, s. 92–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2021.9.2.517
Troitskiy, Sergey. „The problem of terminological precision in studies on cultural exclusion zones”. Rivista di Estetica, 67, 2018, s. 165–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2772
Troitskiy, Sergey, Borys Begun, Ievgeniia Voloshchuk, Oleksandr Chertenko. „Strategies of studying zones of cultural exclusion”. Modern Studies of Russian Society. Eds. Vasiliy Beloly, Nadezhda Petrova. Helsinki, Unigrafia, 2014, s. 79–94.
Troitskiy, Sergey, Zhanna Nikolaeva, Aleksey Tsarev. „Problems of identity in the zones of cultural alienation of the urban environment”. Studia Culturae, 3 (37), 2018, s. 92–111.
Vahštajn, Viktor. Voobražaâ gorod. Vvedenie v teoriû konceptualizacii. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2022.
Werlen, Benno. Society, action and space. Lоndon, Routledge, 1993.
Zelče, Vita. „Atmiņas tekstūra. Otrā pasaules kara pieminekļi Baltija svalstīs” / „The texture of memory. World War II monuments in the Baltic states”. Social Memory of Latvia and Identity Working Papers. Vol. 1. Rīga, ASPRI, 2010.
Zelče, Vita. „History – responsibility – memory: Latvia’s case”. Latvia. Human development report. Accountability and responsibility. 2008/2009. Eds. Juris Rozenvalds, Ivars Ijabs. Rīga, ASPRI, 2009, s. 44–57.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Sergey Troitskiy
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.