Fotografia i film w praktyce artystycznej oraz propozycjach teoretycznych Davida Hockneya

Main Article Content

Piotr Zawojski

Abstrakt

In his diverse works, David Hockney has used, and still uses, various media, which in some periods of his activity gained leading significance, while in the following they were abandoned or temporarily abandoned. But no matter what medium in the given period was the main form of creativity, the focus of his interest has always been the issue of image and imaging. The article is devoted to the practice and theoretical recognition of photography, which was a kind of introduction to experiments with a moving image. The author refers to the artist's numerous publications on the theory and history of image and imaging (including Secret Knowledge, History of Images, On Photography). Photography led to Hockney's audiovisual realizations. This is a kind of repetition of the natural evolution and developmental progression of the media, also, and perhaps above all, in the technological dimension. The article is divided into three parts. In the first part, the author presents Hockney as a practitioner and theoretician, in whose activities both these activities are closely intertwined. This is a sign of the times: practice and theory are equally important, awareness of the medium, or artistic and aesthetic self-awareness of artists, is an expression of the spirit of the era in which an intuitive approach to art today seems inefficient, not to say impossible. Hockney appears to be an exemplary artist, who is extremely conceptual in his artistic practice as a consequence of his research on the history of art and a constantly developed set of his own theoretical findings. He is an artist discursively commenting not only on his work as an artist in many media (painting, drawing, graphics, set design, photography, film, computer graphics), but also an art and media theoretician reflecting on the fate of images in a changing media landscape. The second part of the article is devoted to the reconstruction of Hockney's theoretical reflections on photography and the analysis of his photographic projects. First of all, experimental Polaroid compositions created in the early eighties, named by the artist joiners, as well as photographic collages and photographic images realized in the later periods of the British artist's work. The third part considers digital movies, as Hockney calls them, audiovisual realizations referring to both his previous photographic works and experimental video films in which multi-camera systems are used.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Zawojski, P. (2020). Fotografia i film w praktyce artystycznej oraz propozycjach teoretycznych Davida Hockneya. Artium Quaestiones, (31), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.14746/aq.2020.31.4
Dział
ZWROT KINEMATOGRAFICZNY W PRAKTYCE I TEORII SZTUKI
Biogram autora

Piotr Zawojski, University of Silesia

Associate professor (dr. hab., prof. UŚ) at the Department of Culture Studies, University of Silesia, lecturer at the Department of Intermedia, Academy of Fine Arts in Cracow. His research focuses on photography, film and cinema, new media art, cyberkulture and technoculture. Author of books such as: Elektroniczne obrazoświaty. Między sztuką a technologią (2000), Cyberkultura. Syntopia sztuki, nauki i technologii (2010, 2018), Sztuka obrazu i obrazowania w epoce nowych mediów (2012) Technokultura i jej manifestacje artystyczne. Medialny świat hybryd i hybrydyzacji (2016), Ruchome obrazy zatrzymane w pamięci. Reminiscencje teoretyczne i krytyczne (2017). Editor of Klasyczne dzieła sztuki nowych mediów (2015), Teoria i estetyka fotografii cyfrowej (2017). He is in charge of Film and Media section in „Opcje“ quarterly. 

Bibliografia

  1. Baltrušaitis J., Anamorfozy albo Thaumaturgus opticus, tłum. T. Stróżyński, Gdańsk 2009
  2. Bolsom E., Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art, Amsterdam 2013
  3. Cartier-Bresson H., Decydujący moment, przeł. K. Łyczywek, „Format” 2005, 1–2, s. 2–4
  4. Claire J., Perspectives dépravées, w: D. Hockney, Dialogue avec Picasso, Paris 1999
  5. Clark T.J., Picasso and Truth. From Cubism to Guernica, Princeton–Oxford 2013
  6. Falco C.M., Optics and Renaissance Art, w: Optics in Our Time, red. M.D. Al-Amri, M. El-Gomati, M.S. Zubairy, New York 2016, s. 265–283
  7. Falco C.M., Ibn al-Haytham and the origins of Computerized Image, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4319035_Ibn_al-Haytham_and_the_origins_of_ computerized_image_analysis> [dostęp: 8 lutego 2020]
  8. Friedberg A., Wirtualne okno. Od Albertiego do Microsoftu, tłum. A. Rejniak-Majewska, M. Pabiś-Orzeszyna, Warszawa 2012
  9. Gayford M., A Bigger Message. Conversation with David Hockney, London 2016
  10. Gorman M.J., Art, Optics and History: New Light on the Hockney Thesis, „Leonardo” 2003, 4(38), s. 295–301
  11. Hammer M., Hockney as Philosophical Painter, w: David Hockney, red. C. Stephens, A. Wilson, London 2017
  12. Hanhardt J.G, Bill Viola Interviewed by John G. Hanhardt, w: Bill Viola. Electronic Renaissance, red. A. Galansino, K. Perov, Firenze 2017
  13. Hockney D., David Hockney on Photography: A Lecture at the Victoria and Albert Museum. November 1983, New York 1983
  14. Hockney D., That’s the Way I See It, London 1993
  15. Hockney D., Wiedza tajemna. Sekrety technik malarskich dawnych mistrzów, tłum. J. Holzman, Kraków 2006
  16. Hockney D., Gayford M., Historia obrazów. Od ściany jaskini do ekranu komputera tłum. E. Hornowska, Poznań 2017
  17. Hockney D., Picasso: Paintings of the ’60, <https://www.guggenheim.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/08/9009139_01_9009140_01-Picasso-Paintings-of-the-1960s.pdf> [dostęp: 30 kwietnia 2020]
  18. Hockney D., Falco C.M., Optical Instruments and Imaging: The Use of Optics by 15th Century Master Painters <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228924009_Optical_instruments_and_imaging_The_use_of_optics_by_15th_century_master_painters> [dostęp: 8 lutego 2020]
  19. Hockney D., Falco C.M., The Art of the Science of Renaissance Painting, <https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/falco/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2016/08/NatlGallery. pdf> [dostęp: 6 lutego 2020]
  20. Hockney on Photography. Conversation with Paul Joyce, London 1988
  21. Hoelzl I., Marie R., Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image, Bristol–Chicago 2015
  22. Hoelzl I., Marie R., From Softimage to Postimage, „Leonardo” 2017, 1(50), s. 72–73
  23. King G., Positioning Art Cinema. Film and Culture Value, London–New York 2019
  24. Koepnick L., The Long Take. Art Cinema and the Wondrous, Minneapolis–London 2017
  25. Lechowicz L., Historia fotografii, cz. 1: 1839–2009, Łódź 2012
  26. Livingston M., David Hockney, London 1987
  27. Panofsky E., Perspektywa jako „forma symboliczna”, tłum., wstęp i posłowie G. Jurkowlaniec, Warszawa 2008
  28. Poprzęcka M., Inne obrazy. Oko, widzenie, sztuka. Od Albertiego do Duchampa, Gdańsk 2008
  29. Ritchin F., In Our Own Image. The Coming Revolution in Photography. How Computer Technology is Changing Our View of the World, New York 1999
  30. Rowley G., Principles of Chinese Paintings, Princeton 1974
  31. Rybczyński Z., Traktat o obrazie, Poznań 2009
  32. Stork D.G., Optics and Realism in Renaissance Art, „Scientific American” 2004, 6 (291), s. 77–83
  33. Sykes C.S., David Hockney. The Biography, 1975–2012. A Pilgrim’s Progress, New York–London–Toronto–Sydney–Auckland 2014, s. 157–183
  34. Szarkowski J., The Photographer’s Eye, New York 1966
  35. Tanaka M., Rethinking David Hockney’s „reverse perspective”: The Acceptance of Japanese art in the 1970s and 1980, „Aesthetics” 2018, 21, s. 55–68
  36. Vidler A., Warped Space. Art, Architecture and Anxiety in Modern Culture, Cambridge–London 2000
  37. Vinci L. da, O malarstwie, tłum. L. Staff, Kraków–Budapeszt–Syrakuzy 2019
  38. Weschler L., True to Life: Twenty-Five Years of Conversations with David Hockney, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 2008
  39. Zawojski P., Sztuka obrazu i obrazowania w epoce nowych mediów, Warszawa 2012
  40. Zawojski P., Kubrick w Muzeum (Narodowym), „Opcje” 2014, 3, s. 113–115
  41. Zawojski P., Studio Ideale – utopia (nie)zrealizowana?, w: Polska animacja w XXI wieku, red. M. Kozubek, T. Szczepański, Łódź 2017, s. 274–300
  42. Zawojski P., Od obrazów (audiowizualnych) do postobrazów (hybrydycznych). Perspektywa teoretyczna, „Przegląd Kulturoznawczy” 2019, 1(39), <https://www.ejournals.eu/Przeglad-Kulturoznawczy/2019/Numer-1-39-2019/art/14649/ > [dostęp: 6 lutego