Abstrakt
In his diverse works, David Hockney has used, and still uses, various media, which in some periods of his activity gained leading significance, while in the following they were abandoned or temporarily abandoned. But no matter what medium in the given period was the main form of creativity, the focus of his interest has always been the issue of image and imaging. The article is devoted to the practice and theoretical recognition of photography, which was a kind of introduction to experiments with a moving image. The author refers to the artist's numerous publications on the theory and history of image and imaging (including Secret Knowledge, History of Images, On Photography). Photography led to Hockney's audiovisual realizations. This is a kind of repetition of the natural evolution and developmental progression of the media, also, and perhaps above all, in the technological dimension. The article is divided into three parts. In the first part, the author presents Hockney as a practitioner and theoretician, in whose activities both these activities are closely intertwined. This is a sign of the times: practice and theory are equally important, awareness of the medium, or artistic and aesthetic self-awareness of artists, is an expression of the spirit of the era in which an intuitive approach to art today seems inefficient, not to say impossible. Hockney appears to be an exemplary artist, who is extremely conceptual in his artistic practice as a consequence of his research on the history of art and a constantly developed set of his own theoretical findings. He is an artist discursively commenting not only on his work as an artist in many media (painting, drawing, graphics, set design, photography, film, computer graphics), but also an art and media theoretician reflecting on the fate of images in a changing media landscape. The second part of the article is devoted to the reconstruction of Hockney's theoretical reflections on photography and the analysis of his photographic projects. First of all, experimental Polaroid compositions created in the early eighties, named by the artist joiners, as well as photographic collages and photographic images realized in the later periods of the British artist's work. The third part considers digital movies, as Hockney calls them, audiovisual realizations referring to both his previous photographic works and experimental video films in which multi-camera systems are used.
Bibliografia
Baltrušaitis J., Anamorfozy albo Thaumaturgus opticus, tłum. T. Stróżyński, Gdańsk 2009
Bolsom E., Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art, Amsterdam 2013
Cartier-Bresson H., Decydujący moment, przeł. K. Łyczywek, „Format” 2005, 1–2, s. 2–4
Claire J., Perspectives dépravées, w: D. Hockney, Dialogue avec Picasso, Paris 1999
Clark T.J., Picasso and Truth. From Cubism to Guernica, Princeton–Oxford 2013
Falco C.M., Optics and Renaissance Art, w: Optics in Our Time, red. M.D. Al-Amri, M. El-Gomati, M.S. Zubairy, New York 2016, s. 265–283
Falco C.M., Ibn al-Haytham and the origins of Computerized Image, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4319035_Ibn_al-Haytham_and_the_origins_of_ computerized_image_analysis> [dostęp: 8 lutego 2020]
Friedberg A., Wirtualne okno. Od Albertiego do Microsoftu, tłum. A. Rejniak-Majewska, M. Pabiś-Orzeszyna, Warszawa 2012
Gayford M., A Bigger Message. Conversation with David Hockney, London 2016
Gorman M.J., Art, Optics and History: New Light on the Hockney Thesis, „Leonardo” 2003, 4(38), s. 295–301
Hammer M., Hockney as Philosophical Painter, w: David Hockney, red. C. Stephens, A. Wilson, London 2017
Hanhardt J.G, Bill Viola Interviewed by John G. Hanhardt, w: Bill Viola. Electronic Renaissance, red. A. Galansino, K. Perov, Firenze 2017
Hockney D., David Hockney on Photography: A Lecture at the Victoria and Albert Museum. November 1983, New York 1983
Hockney D., That’s the Way I See It, London 1993
Hockney D., Wiedza tajemna. Sekrety technik malarskich dawnych mistrzów, tłum. J. Holzman, Kraków 2006
Hockney D., Gayford M., Historia obrazów. Od ściany jaskini do ekranu komputera tłum. E. Hornowska, Poznań 2017
Hockney D., Picasso: Paintings of the ’60, <https://www.guggenheim.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/08/9009139_01_9009140_01-Picasso-Paintings-of-the-1960s.pdf> [dostęp: 30 kwietnia 2020]
Hockney D., Falco C.M., Optical Instruments and Imaging: The Use of Optics by 15th Century Master Painters <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228924009_Optical_instruments_and_imaging_The_use_of_optics_by_15th_century_master_painters> [dostęp: 8 lutego 2020]
Hockney D., Falco C.M., The Art of the Science of Renaissance Painting, <https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/falco/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/2016/08/NatlGallery. pdf> [dostęp: 6 lutego 2020]
Hockney on Photography. Conversation with Paul Joyce, London 1988
Hoelzl I., Marie R., Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image, Bristol–Chicago 2015
Hoelzl I., Marie R., From Softimage to Postimage, „Leonardo” 2017, 1(50), s. 72–73
King G., Positioning Art Cinema. Film and Culture Value, London–New York 2019
Koepnick L., The Long Take. Art Cinema and the Wondrous, Minneapolis–London 2017
Lechowicz L., Historia fotografii, cz. 1: 1839–2009, Łódź 2012
Livingston M., David Hockney, London 1987
Panofsky E., Perspektywa jako „forma symboliczna”, tłum., wstęp i posłowie G. Jurkowlaniec, Warszawa 2008
Poprzęcka M., Inne obrazy. Oko, widzenie, sztuka. Od Albertiego do Duchampa, Gdańsk 2008
Ritchin F., In Our Own Image. The Coming Revolution in Photography. How Computer Technology is Changing Our View of the World, New York 1999
Rowley G., Principles of Chinese Paintings, Princeton 1974
Rybczyński Z., Traktat o obrazie, Poznań 2009
Stork D.G., Optics and Realism in Renaissance Art, „Scientific American” 2004, 6 (291), s. 77–83
Sykes C.S., David Hockney. The Biography, 1975–2012. A Pilgrim’s Progress, New York–London–Toronto–Sydney–Auckland 2014, s. 157–183
Szarkowski J., The Photographer’s Eye, New York 1966
Tanaka M., Rethinking David Hockney’s „reverse perspective”: The Acceptance of Japanese art in the 1970s and 1980, „Aesthetics” 2018, 21, s. 55–68
Vidler A., Warped Space. Art, Architecture and Anxiety in Modern Culture, Cambridge–London 2000
Vinci L. da, O malarstwie, tłum. L. Staff, Kraków–Budapeszt–Syrakuzy 2019
Weschler L., True to Life: Twenty-Five Years of Conversations with David Hockney, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 2008
Zawojski P., Sztuka obrazu i obrazowania w epoce nowych mediów, Warszawa 2012
Zawojski P., Kubrick w Muzeum (Narodowym), „Opcje” 2014, 3, s. 113–115
Zawojski P., Studio Ideale – utopia (nie)zrealizowana?, w: Polska animacja w XXI wieku, red. M. Kozubek, T. Szczepański, Łódź 2017, s. 274–300
Zawojski P., Od obrazów (audiowizualnych) do postobrazów (hybrydycznych). Perspektywa teoretyczna, „Przegląd Kulturoznawczy” 2019, 1(39), <https://www.ejournals.eu/Przeglad-Kulturoznawczy/2019/Numer-1-39-2019/art/14649/ > [dostęp: 6 lutego
Licencja
Prawo autorskie regulowane jest oświadczeniem autora przygotowanym przez Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM a od nr XXVIII także umową licencyjną na publikację online zawartą pomiędzy Autorem i Uniwersytetem im. Adama Mickiewicza. Autorzy ponoszą odpowiedzialność za oryginalność zamieszczanego materiału tekstowego oraz regulację praw autorskich dotyczących materiałów ilustracyjnych. W przypadku, gdy materiały pochodzą od redakcji – odpowiedzialność ponosi redakcja czasopisma.
Ten utwór dostepny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.