Abstrakt
The concept of border or boundary has two ambiguities to deal with, if it is to serve a useful intellectual purpose in art and art history. One is to decide whether a border is a line, one that divides, separates, and thus can lead to competition, even to animosity; or whether it constitutes a space within which negotiating can happen. The other ambiguity concerns the differences, in style, period, national background, religious or sexual orientation, between artworks we contemplate in exhibitions, for example. That also raises the question if and how such differences can bridge the gaps and connect the artworks. I propose to take one case, a scene from my installation Don Quijote: Sad Countenances (from 2019), in which the knight errant and his squire have a conversation, seated at a café terrace, and probe their differences in social status, educational level, a probing that threatens their friendship and thereby establishes a new boundary. The scene is ambiguous in that the two sit next to each other in seeming equality, whereas their conversation itself establishes hierarchical relationships, thus making a border. Yet after that tense moment, they revert to their previous, friendly being-together. The border as a dividing line they were building up breaks down when the differences fade away, as the actress playing Sancho reverts to the French of her “boss”. With this making and breaking of borders, the two figures manage to share insights they would not have had before. The conversation scene is only eight minutes long, and establishes differences subsequently fading. There is very little acting, and there is nothing like a beautiful landscape. The differences between the languages they speak (French and Spanish) and the disagreements between them vanish in the face of the impossibility to maintain borders as lines, and instead produce that space of negotiation within which relationships can be restored. This enables the dynamic of empathy between the figures but also, and more importantly, between the fictional conversation and the real visitors.
Bibliografia
After Orientalism: Critical Entanglements, Productive Looks, ed. I.E. Boer, Leiden 2003
Alphen E. van, “Affective Operations of Art and Literature”, RES: Journal of Anthropology and Aesthetics 2008, 53/54 (Spring/Autumn), pp. 20–30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/RESvn1ms25608806
Alphen E. van, “Museumactivisme”, De Witte Raaf 2021, 213, pp. 5–6
Alphen E. van, “Visual Archives and the Holocaust: Christian Boltanski, Ydessa Hendeles and Peter Forgacs”, in: Intercultural Aesthetics: A Worldview Perspective, eds. A. Van den Braembrusche, H. Kimmerle, N. Note, Berlin 2009, pp. 137–156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5780-9_10
Appadurai A., C. Breckenridge, “Museums are Good to Think: Heritage on View in India”, in: Museums and Communities: The Politics of Public Culture, eds. I. Karp, C. Mullen Kraemer, S.D. Lavine, Washington–London 1992, pp. 34–55
Bal M., Concepts itinérants. Comment se déplacer dans les sciences humaines, trans. C. Dutheil de la Rochère, Dijon 2023
Bal M., “Intership: Anachronism between Loyalty and the Case”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, ed. T. Leitch, New York–Oxford 2017, pp. 179–196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199331000.013.10
Bal M., Murder and Difference: Gender, Genre and Scholarship on Sisera’s Death, trans. M. Gumpert, Bloomington–Indianapolis 1988
Bal M., Narratology. Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, Toronto 2017Bal M., Of What One Cannot Speak: Doris Salcedo’s Political Art, Chicago, IL 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226035802.001.0001
Bal M., Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide, Toronto 2002
Bhabha H.K., The Location of Culture, London 1994
Bibliowicz A., Migas de pan, Bogota 2013
Boer I.E., Disorienting vision: Rereading Stereotypes in French Orientalist Texts and Images, Amsterdam 2004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004456662
Bollas C., The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known, New York 1987
Brinkema E., The Forms of the Affects, Durham, NC 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376774
Buydens M., Sahara: L’esthétique de Gilles Deleuze, Paris 2005
Calkins N.A., “Object-teaching: its purpose and province”, Education 1980, 1, pp. 165–172
Davey N., “The Hermeneutics of Seeing”, in: Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual, eds. I. Heywood, B. Sandwell, London–New York 1999, pp. 3–29
Derrida J., The Truth in Painting, trans. G. Bennington and I. McLeod, Chicago 1987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226807690.001.0001
The Familial Gaze, ed. M. Hirsch, Hanover, NH 1999
Goffman E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York 1956
Hooper-Greenhill E., Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture, New York 2000
Jay M., “Scopic Regimes of Modernity”, in: Vision and Visuality 2, ed. H. Foster, Seattle 1988, pp. 3–38
Lipiński F., “Cinematic Art (History) and Mieke Bal’s Thinking in Film”, Artium Quaestiones 2020, 21, pp. 5–38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/aq.2020.31.1
Mouffe C., On the Political, New York–London 2005
The Point of Theory, eds. M. Bal, I.E. Boer, Amsterdam–New York 1994
Rebentisch J., “Realism Today. Art, Politics, and the Critique of Representation”, in: Thinking-Resisting-Reading the Political, eds. A. Esch-van Kan, S. Packard, P. Schulte, Berlin 2013, pp. 245–261
Silverman K., World Spectators, Stanford 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503618633
The Social Life of Things, ed. A. Appadurai, Cambridge 1986
Uncertain Territories: Boundaries in Cultural Analysis, eds. M. Bal, B. van Eekelen, P. Spyer, Amsterdam–New York 2006
Winkel C. van, “Het representatieve museum”, De Witte Raaf 2024, 227, pp. 12–13
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Mieke Bal

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawo autorskie regulowane jest oświadczeniem autora przygotowanym przez Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM a od nr XXVIII także umową licencyjną na publikację online zawartą pomiędzy Autorem i Uniwersytetem im. Adama Mickiewicza. Autorzy ponoszą odpowiedzialność za oryginalność zamieszczanego materiału tekstowego oraz regulację praw autorskich dotyczących materiałów ilustracyjnych. W przypadku, gdy materiały pochodzą od redakcji – odpowiedzialność ponosi redakcja czasopisma.
Ten utwór dostepny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.