Keywords
epigraphy
paleographic analysis
linguistic reconstruction
Indo-European languages
funerary formulae
How to Cite
Abstract
The article concerns the problem of interpreting the few preserved Thracian inscriptions, which constitute a key source for the study of the almost unknown Thracian language. The problem is significant due to the limited source base and the difficulties in reading and interpreting the texts. The aim of the work is to propose a new interpretation of two of the most important epigraphic monuments: the inscription from the Ezerovo ring (5th century BC) and the inscription from the funerary slab from Kjolmen (6th century BC). The author applies linguistic methods, including paleographic analysis of signs, comparisons with Indo-European languages, and phonological and morphological reconstruction of the texts. The most important results include a revision of previous readings of signs, identification of phonetic values of certain symbols, and the proposal of a coherent interpretation of the structure of the Kjolmen text as a two-line formula of Indo-European character. The author interprets a key word as referring to a “grave cover” and reconstructs the meaning of the inscription as a funerary formula of the type: “whoever violates this grave shall be punished.” The analysis also indicates the presence of grammatical and lexical elements with clear parallels in other Indo-European languages. The conclusion is that despite the limited material it is possible to partially reconstruct the meaning of Thracian inscriptions, and that the Thracian language shows strong connections with the Indo-European family, which opens new research perspectives.
References
Besevliev V., Inschrift in unbekannter Sprache aus Nordbulgarien, „Glotta” 1965, Bd. 43, S. 317–322.
Besevliev V., Inschrift in unbekannter Sprache aus Bulgarien, „Linguistique balkanique” 1966, Bd. 11, S. 5–8.
Detschew D., Die thrakischen Sprachreste, Wien 1957.
Endzelin J., Lettische Grammatik, Riga 1922.
Georgiev V., Die Deutung der altertümlichen thrakischen Inschrift aus Kjolmen, „Linguistique balkanique” 1966, Bd. 11, S. 9–23.
Georgiev V., Trakite i technijat ezik, Sofija 1977.
Katičić R., Ancient Languages of the Balkans, Bd. 1, Den Haag–Paris 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111568874
Kiparsky P., Tense and Mood in Indo-European Syntax, „Foundations of Language” 1968, Bd. 4, S. 30–57.
Lehmann W. P., Proto-Indo-European Syntax, Austin–London 1974.
Lehmann W. P., The Reconstruction of Non-simple Sentences in Proto-Indo-European, [in:] Ramat P. u. a. (Hrsg.), Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax, Amsterdam 1980, S. 113–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.19.10leh
Merlingen W., Zur Sprache der thrakischen Ringinschrift, „Die Sprache” 1960, Bd. 6, S. 179–192.
Neroznak V. P., Paleobalkanskie jazyki, Moskva 1978.
Oizscha K., Rezension zu Georgiev 1966, „Indogermanische Forschungen” 1967, Bd. 72, S. 152–156.
Ramat P. u. a. (Hrsg.), Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax. Proceedings of the Colloquium of the Indogermanische Gesellschaft (Pavia, 6.–7. September 1979), Amsterdam 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.19
Russu I. I., Die Sprache der Thrako-Daker, București 1969.
Schmidt J., Die Pluralbildungen der indogermanischen Neutra, Weimar 1889.
Schmitt-Brandt R., Die thrakischen Inschriften, „Glotta” 1967, Bd. 45, S. 40–60.
Watkins C., Indo-European Origins of the Celtic Verb. Part One: The Sigmatic Aorist, Dublin 1962.
Watkins C., Preliminaries to a Historical and Comparative Analysis of the Syntax of the Old Irish Verb, „Celtica” 1963, Bd. 6, S. 1–49.
License
© by Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of History, Poznań, 1990
OPEN ACCESS