Słowa kluczowe
social stratification
high participation systems
global science
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
The global stratification of higher education institutions is accompanied by the vertical differentiation of the academic profession. The various segments of the profession and the various components of higher education systems have been drifting apart. A general contrast emerges between the haves and have-nots in terms of working conditions and the attractiveness of the academic profession at the individual level; and the global visibility in league tables and access to national research funding at the institutional level. In massified systems, the traditional teaching-research nexus will be maintained in practice almost exclusively in the small elite sub-sector. The opportunities at the disposal of institutions will vary immensely in the future, but the most important, qualitative distinction will be between the top 1,000 universities and the rest (comprising about 25,000–30,000 institutions).
Bibliografia
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F. (2019a). The collaboration behavior of top scien-tists. Scientometrics, 118(1), 215–232.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F. (2019b). A gender analysis of top scientists’ col-laboration behavior: Evidence from Italy. Scientometrics, 120, 405–418.
Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., Rumbley, L.E. (2010). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Antonowicz, D., Kwiek, M. (2014). The changing paths in academic careers in European Universities: Minor steps and major milestones. W: T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, B.M. Kehm (red.), Academic Careers in Europe – Trends, Challenges, Perspectives (ss. 41–68). Dordrecht: Springer.
Besselaar, van den, P., Sandström, U. (2017). Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183301.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., Ashton, D. (2011). The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Edu-cation, Jobs, and Incomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cantwell, B., Coates, H., King, R. (red.) (2018). Handbook on the Politics of Higher Educa-tion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cantwell, B., Marginson, S. (2018). Vertical stratification. W: Cantwell, B., Marginson, S., Smolentseva, A. (red.), High Participation Systems of Higher Education (ss. 125–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cantwell, B., Marginson, S., Smolentseva, A. (red.) (2018). High Participation Systems of Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cummings, W.K., Finkelstein, M.J. (2012). Scholars in the Changing American Academy. New Contexts, New Rules and New Roles. Dordrecht: Springer.
Elsevier (2020). The Research Journey Through a Gender Lens: An Examination of Research Participation, Career Progression and Perceptions Across the Globe. Amsterdam: Else-vier.
Hermanowicz, J. (2012). The sociology of academic careers: Problems and prospects. W: J.C. Smart, M.B. Paulsen (red.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, t. 27 (ss. 207–248). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Horta, H., Jung, J., Santos, J.M. (2019). Mobility and research performance of academics in city-based higher education systems. Higher Education Policy, 33, 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00173-x.
Ioannidis, J.P.A., Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R. (2014). Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. PLOSOne. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101698.
Jaeger, A., Dinin, A.J. (2018). The Postdoc Landscape: The Invisible Scholars. London: Aca-demic Press.
Johnson, D.R. (2017). A Fractured Profession: Commercialism and Conflict in Academic Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Johnstone, D.B., Marcucci, P. (2010). Financing Higher Education Worldwide: Who Pays? Who should pay? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kwiek, M. (2006). The University and the State: A Study into Global Transformations. Frank-furt am Main–New York: Peter Lang.
Kwiek, M. (2008). Revisiting the classical German idea of the university (on the nationaliza-tion of a modern institution). Polish Journal of Philosophy, 2(1), 55–78.
Kwiek, M. (2013). Knowledge Production in European Universities: States, Markets, and Academic Entrepreneurialism. Frankfurt am Main–New York: Peter Lang.
Kwiek, M. (2015). Uniwersytet w dobie przemian. Instytucje i kadra akademicka w warunkach rosnącej konkurencji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics across 11 European systems. Higher Education, 71(3), 379–397.
Kwiek, M. (2018a). Building a new society and economy: High participation higher education in Poland. W: B. Cantwell, S. Marginson, A. Smolentseva (red.), High Participation Sys-tems of Higher Education (ss. 334–357). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kwiek, M. (2018b). High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? Scientometrics, 115(1), 415–462.
Kwiek, M. (2019). Changing European Academics: A Comparative Study of Social Stratifica-tion, Work Patterns and Research Productivity. London–New York: Routledge.
Kwiek, M. (2020). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 81, 493–519.
Kwiek, M. (2021a). The Globalization of Science: The Increasing Power of Individual Scien-tists. W: P. Mattei, X. Dumay, E. Mangez, J. Behrend (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Ed-ucation and Globalization (ss. 1–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kwiek, M. (2021b). The prestige economy of higher education journals: A quantitative ap-proach. Higher Education, 81, 493–519.
Kwiek, M., Roszka, W. (2021a). Gender disparities in international research collaboration: A large-scale bibliometric study of 25,000 university professors. Journal of Economic Sur-veys, 35(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12395.
Kwiek, M., Roszka, W. (2021b). Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 1–38.
Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in Education. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Marginson, S. (2014). University research: The social contribution of university research. W: J.C., Shin, U. Teichler (red.), The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Cross-roads: Restructuring Systems and Functions (ss. 101–118). Dordrecht: Springer.
Marginson, S. (2016a). Global stratification in higher education. W: S. Slaughter, B.J. Taylor (red.), Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development (ss. 13–34). Dor-drecht: Springer.
Marginson, S. (2016b). High participation systems of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 243–271.
Marginson, S. (2016c). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72, 413–434.
Melguizo, T., Strober, M.H. (2007). Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige. Re-search in Higher Education, 48(6), 633–668.
Nielsen, M.W., Andersen, J.P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2012208118.
OECD (2020). Education at a glance 2020. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2021), Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/d8b068b4-en (dostęp: 18.03.2021).
Olechnicka, A., Płoszaj, A., Celińska-Janowicz, D. (2019). The Geography of Scientific Col-laboration. London–New York: Routledge.
Oleksiyenko, A.V. (2018). Global Mobility and Higher Learning. New York: Routledge.
Rivera, L.A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.
Rivera, L.A. (2015). Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton–Oxford: Prince-ton University Press.
Roach, M., Sauermann, H. (2017). The declining interest in an academic. PLOS ONE, 12(9).
Rosinger, K.O., Taylor, B.J., Coco, L., Slaughter, S. (2016). Organizational segmentation and the prestige economy: Deprofessionalization in high- and low-resource departments. Jour-nal of Higher Education, 87(1), 27–54.
Schofer, E., Meyer, J.W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twenti-eth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.
SciVal (2021). Globalna baza dostępna na stronie www.scival.com (dostęp ograniczony).
Scopus (2021). Globalna baza dostępna na stronie www.scopus.com (dostęp ograniczony).
Slaughter, S., Leslie L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepre-neurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., Taylor, B.J. (red.) (2016). Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce De-velopment: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US and Canada. Dordrecht: Springer.
Stephan, P. (2012). How Economics Shapes Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, B., Rosinger, K.O., Slaughter, S. (2016). Patents and university strategies in the pres-tige economy. W: S. Slaughter, B.J. Taylor (red.), Higher Education Stratification and Workforce Development (ss. 103–125). Dordrecht: Springer.
Teichler, U. (2014). Teaching and research in Germany: The notions of university professors. W: J.C. Shin, A. Arimoto, W.K. Cummings, U. Teichler (red.), Research in Contemporary Higher Education (ss. 61–87). Dordrecht: Springer.
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. Berkeley: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.
Wagner, C.S. (2018). The Collaborative Era Science: Governing the Network. London: Pal-grave Macmillan.
Yemini, M. (2021). International research collaborations as perceived by top-performing scholars. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 3–18.
Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P.G., Rumbley. L.E. (red.) (2015). Young Faculty in the Twenty- First Century: International Perspectives. Albany: SUNY.
Licencja
1. W momencie złożenia pracy celem rozpoczęcia postępowania w sprawie publikacji, Licencjodawca, zwany dalej Autorem, akceptuje wszystkie zasady umieszczone na stronie internetowej czasopisma “Człowiek i Społeczeństwo”, udzielając Licencjobiorcy, zwanego dalej Wydawcą, niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji na korzystanie z Utworu. Licencja zakłada tym samym brak ograniczeń terytorialnych, czasowych oraz ilościowych na następujących polach eksploatacji (art. 50 ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych):
a. utrwalanie Utworu;
b. zwielokrotnienie Utworu drukiem i w wersji cyfrowej;
c. wprowadzenie do obrotu, użyczenie lub najem oryginału/zwielokrotnionych egzemplarzy Utworu;
d. publiczne wykonanie, wystawienie, wyświetlenie, odtworzenie oraz nadawanie i reemitowanie, a także publiczne udostępnianie Utworu w taki sposób, aby każdy mógł mieć do niego dostęp w miejscu i w czasie przez siebie wybranym;
e. włączenie Utworu w skład utworu zbiorowego;
f. wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej na platformy elektroniczne lub inne wprowadzenie Utworu w postaci elektronicznej do Internetu, Intranetu, Extranetu lub innej sieci;
g. rozpowszechnianie Utworu w wersji elektronicznej w Internecie, Intranecie, Extranecie lub innej sieci, w pracy zbiorowej, a także samodzielnie w formule Open Access w oparciu o licencję Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), a także inną wersję językową tej licencji, lub którąkolwiek późniejszą wersję tej licencji.
2. Założenia licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowa Licencja Publiczna (CC BY 4.0), udzielają Wydawcy upoważnienia do kopiowania, zmieniania, rozprowadzania, przedstawiania i wykonywania Utworu jedynie pod warunkiem uznania autorstwa.
3. Wraz z dostarczeniem Utworu, Autor zobowiązuje się do wypełnienia, podpisania oraz odesłania skanu umowy