Uczony jako intelektualista publiczny. Przykład religioznawstwa

Main Article Content

Sławomir Sztajer

Abstrakt

The article discusses the role of public intellectuals, with particular emphasis on scholars specializing in the study of religions. While various functions and aims of public intellectuals are taken into account, the article focuses primarily on risks related to scholars’ engagement in public discourse. The history of the academic study of religion shows that many of its representatives were involved in various ideological endeavors, including political ideologies. It is argued that the main role of the public intellectual in the study of religion is not to be a functionary of religious institutions nor even an interpreter of religious traditions, but a critical researcher who impartially popularizes knowledge about religions and highlights the mechanisms underlying the dynamics of the religious world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Sztajer, S. (2021). Uczony jako intelektualista publiczny. Przykład religioznawstwa. Człowiek I Społeczeństwo, 52, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2021.52.8
Dział
ARTYKUŁY

Referencje

  1. Allen, D. (1994). Recent defenders of Eliade: A critical evaluation. Religion, 24, 333–351.
  2. Bronk, A. (1996). Nauka wobec religii. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
  3. Dawkins, R. (2007). Bóg urojony, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CIS.
  4. Dubuisson, D. (2014). Twentieth Century Mythologies. London–New York: Routledge.
  5. Eliade, M. (1997). W poszukiwaniu historii i znaczenia religii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
  6. Etzioni, A., Bowdith, A. (2006). Public Intellectuals: An Endangered Species? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  7. Fisher, E. (2010). Fascist scholars, fascist scholarship: The quest for ur-fascism and the study of religion. W: Ch.K. Wedemeyer, W. Doniger (red.), Hermeneutics, Politics, and the His-tory of Religions: The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach & Mircea Eliade (ss. 261–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Foucault, M. (1988). Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984. London: Routledge.
  9. Ioanid, R. (2004). The sacralised politics of the Romanian Iron Guard. Totalitarian Movement and Political Religions, 5(3), 419–453.
  10. Jennings, J. (2002). Death of the intellectual: A comparative autopsy. W: H. Small (red.), The Public Intellectual (ss. 110–130). Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. Joffe, J. (2003). The decline of the public intellectual and the rise of the pundit (ss. 109–122). W: A.M. Melzer, J. Weinberger, M.R. Zinman (red.), The Public Intellectual: Between Philosophy and Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  12. Komaniecka-Łyp, M. (2021). Jan Kanty Wierusz-Kowalski – benedyktyn, tajny współpra-cownik, religioznawca i funkcjonariusz. W: Ł. Marek, R. Łętocha (red.), Ile z nauki, ile z ideologii? Religioznawstwo w PRL (ss. 267–295). Kraków: IPN.
  13. Łętocha, R. (2021). Wizja zadań i celów religioznawstwa marksistowskiego na łamach czaso-pisma „Euhemer. Przegląd Religioznawczy” 1957–1989. W: Ł. Marek, R. Łętocha (red.), Ile z nauki, ile z ideologii? Religioznawstwo w PRL (ss. 129–137). Kraków: IPN.
  14. Marek, Ł., Łętocha, R. (red.) (2021). Ile z nauki, ile z ideologii? Religioznawstwo w PRL. Kraków: IPN.
  15. Martin, L.H., Wiebe, D. (2012). Religious studies as a scientific discipline: A persistence of a delusion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80(3), 587–597.
  16. McCutcheon, R.T. (1993). The myth of the apolitical scholar. Queen’s Quarterly, 100, 642–663.
  17. McCutcheon, R.T. (1997). A default of critical intelligence? the scholar of religion as Public intellectual. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 443–468.
  18. Michael, J. (2000). Anxious Intellectuals: Academic Professionals, Public Intellectuals, and Enlightenment Values. Durham–London: Duke University Press.
  19. Nowicki, A. (1969). Centralne kategorie religioznawstwa marksistowskiego. Euhemer, 1–2(71–72), 3–17.
  20. Posner, R.A. (2001). Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-versity Press.
  21. Said, E.W. (1996). Representations of the Intellectual: The 1993 Reith Lecture, New York: Vintage Books.
  22. Smart, N. (1973). The Science of Religion and the Sociology of Knowledge. Princeton: Prince-ton University Press.
  23. Strenski, I. (1987). Four Theories of Myth in the Twentieth Century: Cassirer, Eliade, Levi-Strauss, and Malinowski, Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
  24. Rennie, B.S. (1992). The diplomatic career of Mircea Eliade: A response to Adriana Berger. Religion, 22, 375–392.
  25. Waardenburg, J. (1974). W sprawie fenomenologii religii. Uwagi zasadnicze. Euhemer – Przegląd Religioznawczy, 3(93), 73–87.
  26. Weitzman, M. (2020). “One Knows the Tree by the Fruit That It Bears:” Mircea Eliade’s in-fluence on current far-right ideology. Religions, 11, 250.