The importance of the researcher’s insider status in the study of minority group members’ narratives
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

insider research
insider status
narrative psychology
reflexivity

How to Cite

Bandel, J. (2023). The importance of the researcher’s insider status in the study of minority group members’ narratives. Człowiek I Społeczeństwo, 56, 163–188. https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2023.56.8

Abstract

Insider research, i.e. research that the researcher conducts on a population, community, or identity group of which he or she is himself or herself a member, has been gaining popularity in psychological research in recent years. A subject of lively debate in the literature is the importance of the researcher’s characteristics shared with the research participant: life experiences, specific aspects of identity, traits, skills, or attitudes. This article summarises current knowledge on insider research and draws attention to the importance of analysing the psychologist researcher’s insider and outsider status. The article begins with an outline of the history of consideration of the importance of the researcher’s status in the social sciences and four main strategies for researchers to approach their insider status: minimizing and maximizing its importance, incorporating their experiences into the research material, and using them at different stages of the research process. Then, using the example of the author’s research project, it is shown how the last strategy can be applied during narrative research in planning the study, recruiting participants, conducting interviews, and analysing the data. The final part of the text is a consideration of the ethical dilemmas surrounding the conduct of insider research. 

https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2023.56.8
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Aguilar, J.L. (1981). Insider Research: An Ethnography of a Debate. W: D.A. Messerschmidt (red.), Anthropologists at Home in North America: Methods and Issues in the Study of One’s Own Society (ss. 15–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AI. (2022). „Byliśmy traktowani jak przestępcy”. Od atmosfery wrogości po nękanie osób broniących praw LGBTI. Amnesty International.

APA. (2018). Qualitative Design Reporting Standards (JARS-Qual). Amerykańskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.

Asselin, M.E. (2001). Knowledge Utilization Among Experienced Staff Nurses. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 17(3), 115–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00124645-200105000-00003

Asselin, M.E. (2003). Insider Research: Issues to Consider when Doing Qualitative Research in Your Own Setting. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19(2), 99–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00124645-200303000-00008

Baerger, D.R., McAdams, D.P. (1999). Life Story Coherence and Its Relation to Psychological Well-being. Narrative Inquiry, 9(1), 69–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.9.1.05bae

Bandel, J. (2022). Ujawnianie i rozwój tożsamości homoseksualnej. Raport z badania gejów aktywistów społecznych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Rys.

Bavelas, J.B., Coates, L., Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as Co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 941–952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.941

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2020). One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Breen, L.J. (2007). The Researcher ‘in the middle’: Negotiating the Insider/Outsider Dichotomy. The Australian Community Psychologist, 19(1), 163–174.

Brown, N.E. (2012). Negotiating the Insider/Outsider Status: Black Feminist Ethnography and Legislative Studies. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 3, 19–34.

Brzeziński, J. (2010). Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Chmielewski, J.F., Yost, M.R. (2013). Psychosocial Influences on Bisexual Women’s Body Image: Negotiating Gender and Sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 224–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311426126

Corbin Dwyer, S., Buckle, J.L. (2009). The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105

Crawford, M. (2013). Meaning-Making and Feminist Practice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 256–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313482874

Crean, M. (2018). Minority Scholars and Insider-Outsider Researcher Status: Challenges Along a Personal, Professional and Political Continuum. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(1), artykuł 17.

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Ellis, C., Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. W: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (ss. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Figley, C.R. (red.). (1995). Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those Who Treat the Traumatized. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Flick, U. (2011). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Flores, D. (2018). Standing in the Middle: Insider/Outsider Positionality While Conducting Qualitative Research with Opposing Military Veteran Political Groups. SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 2. Sage Publications, Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526437181

Gair, S. (2009). More on Empathy: Considering Students’ Responses and Edith Stein’s Framework for a Fuller, Transformative Empathy. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 11, 51–69.

Gair, S. (2012). Feeling Their Stories: Contemplating Empathy, Insider/Outsider Positionings, and Enriching Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 134–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420580

Greene, M.J. (2014). In the Inside Looking in: Methodological Insights and Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Insider Research. The Qualitative Report, 19(29), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1106

Grobler, A. (2006). Metodologia nauk. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak, Wydawnictwo Aureus.

Grunt-Mejer, K., Iniewicz, G. (2020). Psychospołeczne korelaty orientacji seksualnej. W: W.Ł. Dragan, G. Iniewicz (red.), Orientacja seksualna. Źródła i konteksty (ss. 15–48). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Hornowska, E. (2007). Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Johnston, M.S. (2019). When Madness Meets Madness: Insider Reflections on Doing Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919835356

Kanuha, V.K. (2000). „Being” Native Versus „Going Native”: Conducting Social Work Research as an Insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/45.5.439

Kersen, T.M. (2016). Insider/Outsider: The Unique Nature of the Sociological Perspective and Practice. Journal of Applied Social Science, 10(2), 104–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724415626961

Kinitz, D.J. (2022). The Emotional and Psychological Labor of Insider Qualitative Research Among Systematically Marginalized Groups: Revisiting the Uses of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 32(11), 1635–1647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221112620

Komalasari, R., Nurhayati, N., Mustafa, C. (2022). Insider/Outsider Issues: Reflections on Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 27(3), 744–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5259

Kong, T.S.K., Mahoney, D., Plummer, K. (2001). Queering the Interview. W: J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein (red.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method (ss. 239–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n16

Kvale, S. (2010). Prowadzenie wywiadów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Letherby, G., Zdrodowski, D. (1995). „Dear Researcher”: The Use of Correspondence as a Method Within Feminist Qualitative Research. Gender & Society, 9(5), 576–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009005005

Levitt, H.M., Motulsky, S.L., Wertz, F.J., Morrow, S.L., Ponterotto, J.G. (2017). Recommendations for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082

Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Malewski, M. (2017). Badania jakościowe w naukach społecznych. O potrzebie metodologicznej wyobraźni. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek –Edukacja: Kwartalnik Myśli Społeczno-Pedagogicznej, 20(4), 105–120.

Malinowski, B. (1987). Argonauci Zachodniego Pacyfiku. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

McAdams, D.P. (1994). The Person: An Introduction to the Science of Personality Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Merton, R.K. (1972). Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/225294

Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Ogińska-Bulik, N., Juczyński, Z. (2020). Kiedy trauma innych staje się własną. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Olmos-Vega, F.M., Stalmeijer, R.E., Varpio, L., Kahlke, R. (2022). A Practical Guide to Reflexivity in Qualitative Research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Orr, E., Durepos, P., Jones, V., Jack, S.M. (2021). Risk of Secondary Distress for Graduate Students Conducting Qualitative Research on Sensitive Subjects: A Scoping Review of Canadian Dissertations and Theses. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393621993803

Pasupathi, M. (2001). The Social Construction of the Personal Past and Its Implications for Adult Development. Psychological Bulletin, 127(5), 651–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.651

Pasupathi, M., Billitteri, J. (2015). Being and Becoming Through Being Heard: Listener Effects on Stories and Selves. The International Journal of Listening, 29(2), 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1029363

Pasupathi, M., Hoyt, T. (2009). The Development of Narrative Identity in Late Adolescence and Emergent Adulthood: The Continued Importance of Listeners. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 558–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014431

Pasupathi, M., Rich, B. (2005). Inattentive Listening Undermines Self-verification in Personal Storytelling. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1051–1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00338.x

Puchalska-Wasyl, M., Oleś, P.K. (2008). Teoria narracyjnej tożsamości Dana P. McAdamsa. W: P.K. Oleś, A. Batory (red.), Tożsamość i jej przemiany a kultura (ss. 247–278). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Ross, L.E. (2017). An Account from the Inside: Examining the Emotional Impact of Qualitative Research Through the Lens of „Insider” Research. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3), 326–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000064

Ryan, L., Golden, A. (2006). ‘Tick the box please’: A Reflexive Approach to Doing Quantitative Social Research. Sociology, 40(6), 1191–1200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506072287

Sarbin, T.R. (1986). The Narrative as a Root Metaphor for Psychology. W: T.R. Sarbin (red.), Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Słysz, A., Soroko, E. (2012). „A Scientific Journey”: On Experiencing Qualitative Research. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 13(1–2), 36–44.

Soroko, E. (2014). Aktywność autonarracyjna osób o różnych poziomach organizacji osobowości. Opowieści o bliskich związkach. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Straś-Romanowska, M. (2010). Badania ilościowe vs jakościowe – pytanie o tożsamość psychologii. Roczniki Psychologiczne, XIII(1), 97–105.

Struzik, J. (2019). Solidarność queerowa. Mobilizacja, ramy i działania ruchów queerowych w Polsce. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Taylor, J. (2011). The Intimate Insider: Negotiating the Ethics of Friendship when Doing Insider Research. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 3–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110384447

Taylor, Y. (2005). Classed in a Classless Climate: Me and My Associates… Feminism & Psychology, 15(4), 491–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353505057621

Thurairajah, K. (2019). Uncloaking the Researcher: Boundaries in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 15(1), 132–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.06

Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2008). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London, New York – Dunedin: Zed Books Ltd – University of Otago Press.

Wilkinson, S., Kitzinger, C. (2013). Representing Our Own Experience: Issues in „Insider” Research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 251–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313483111

Winiewski, M., Świder, M. (red.). (2021). Sytuacja społeczna osób LGBTA w Polsce. Raport za lata 2019–2020. Kampania Przeciw Homofobii i Stowarzyszenie Lambda Warszawa.

Yost, M.R., Chmielewski, J.F. (2013). Blurring the Line Between Researcher and Researched in Interview Studies: A Feminist Practice? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 242–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464698

Zielona-Jenek, M., Izdebska, A., Soroko, E. (2023). Entering terra incognita: Adapting Psychotherapists to Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2278–2297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6036

Żurko, M., Bartosz, B. (2021). O etycznych aspektach badań narracyjnych w nurcie jakościowym. Z doświadczeń badań nad osobami starszymi i osobami z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną. W: E. Dryll, A. Cierpka, K. Małek (red.), Psychologia narracyjna. O mądrości, miłości i cierpieniu (ss. 401–418). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47943/lib.9788363487461.rozdzial17