Abstract
Roman Ingarden was a prominent Polish philosopher, aesthetician and theorist whose achievements in the field of phenomenology have exerted a significant influence on contemporary Chinese students and scholars. Although papers and monographs on Ingarden have been produced within the Chinese academic community, none has been written in English to review his dissemination and reception in China. This paper focuses on the following three questions: First, under what circumstances was Ingarden introduced to China? Second, how was his work disseminated within and received by China’s research community? And last, what influence does he have on Chinese students and scholars today? Addressing these questions will help promote cultural exchange and mutual understanding between China and Poland.
References
Chen, Deng. „On Ingarden’s Aesthetics of Phenomenology”. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University 4 (2001): 8–11. [陈登：《论罗曼·英伽登的现象学美学》，载《四川外语学院学报》2001年7月第17卷第4期，第8-11页。]
Guo, Yongjian. A Study of Roman Ingarden’s On Literary Works from the Perspective of Literature Phenomenology. Shanghai: Academia Press, 2011. [郭勇健：《文学现象学：英加登<论文学作品>研究》，上海：学林出版社，2011年。]
Jiang, Jiyong. „Roman Ingarden’s Influence on Reader Reception Theory”. Foreign Literature Studies 1 (2001): 7–11. [蒋济永：《罗曼·英伽登对读者接受理论的影响》，载《外国文学研究》2001年第1期，第7-11页。]
Li, Xiaolin. „An Analysis of Ingarden’s Metaphysical Quality”. Journal of Fuzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3 (2013): 83–87. [李晓林：《英加登“形而上学质”辨析》，载《福州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第3期，第83-87页。]
Liu, Yanshun. „Phenomenology Reduction as Cognitive Reduction Trespasses Aesthetic Reduction: On the Delay of Aesthetic Temporality in Ingarden’s «The Literary Work of Art»”. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2 (2024): 12–21. [刘彦顺：《现象学还原作为认识还原对审美还原的僭越罗曼·英加登<论文学作品>对审美时间性的耽搁》，载《东北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第2期，第12-21页。] DOI: https://doi.org/10.61369/etr.3386
Luo, Fuwen. „On the Occurrence and its Immanent Logic of Picture Consciousness”. Jiangsu Social Sciences 2 (2013): 46–51. [罗绂文：《试论图像意识的发生与内在逻辑》，载《江苏社会科学》2013年第2期，第46-51页。]
Su, Hongbin. „A Study of the Three Dimensions of Ingarden’s Literary Language Phenomenology: Linguistic Sound, Meaning and Object”. Social Science Front 9 (2019): 165–173. [苏宏斌：《语音·意义·现象：英加登文学语言现象学的三个维度》，载《社会科学战线》2019年第9期，第165-173。]
Su, Hongbin. An Introduction to Phenomenological Aesthetics. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2005. [苏宏斌：《现象学美学导论》，北京：商务印书馆，2005。]
Wang, Yichuan. „Interpretation of the Strata of Literary Text and other Strata”. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art 1 (2011): 2–6. [王一川：《理解文学文本层面及其余衍层》，载《文艺理论研究》2011年第1期，第2-6页]
Wu, Keqin. „On Ingarden’s Literary Ontology Thoughts”. A dissertation submitted to Suzhou University for Ph.D., September 2010. [武克勤：《英伽登文学本体论思想研究》，苏州大学博士学位论文，2010年9月。]
Xiong, Haiyang. „A Research on Roman Ingarden’s Art Theory”. A dissertation submitted to Nanjing University for Ph.D., May 2019. [熊海洋：《罗曼·英伽登的艺术理论研究》，南京大学博士学位论文，2019年5月。]
Zhang, Xushu. A Study of Ingarden’s Phenomenological Aesthetics. Hefei: Huangshan Publishing House, 2004. [张旭曙：《英伽登现象学美学初论》，合肥：黄山书社，2004。]
Zhang, Yongqing. „Problems and Thinking: Studies of Ingarden’s Literary Theory for Three Decades”. Literature & Art Studies 2 (2011): 40–46. [张永清：《问题与思考：英伽登文论研究三十年》，载《文艺研究》2011年第2期，第40-46页。]
Zhang, Yongqing. „The Reception of Literary Theory of Roman Ingarden in Contemporary China”. Yuejiang Academic Journal 6 (2010): 118–126. [张永清：《罗曼·英伽登文论在当代中国的接受》，载《阅江学刊》2010年12月第6期，第118-126页。]
Zhang, Yunpeng, Hu Yishan. Phenomenology Method and Aesthetics: from Husserl to Dufrenne. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2007. [张云鹏、胡艺珊：《现象学方法与美学：从胡塞尔到杜夫海纳》，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2007年。]
Zhu, Shu. „Situation Translation and Translational Situation: A Study of the Meta-Problem of Drama Translation”. A dissertation submitted to East China Normal University, May 2014. [朱姝：《情境翻译与翻译情境戏剧翻译元问题研究》，华东师范大学博士学位论文，2014年5月。
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yixiang Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors of articles are responsible for securing the rights to other publications (texts, tables, drawings and other illustrations) quoted or reproduced in their texts.