Independence, Academic Freedom and Autonomy. Models of Coordination of Higher Education - In the Margin of Clark Kerr’s Paper
PDF (Język Polski)

How to Cite

Jabłecka, J. (2016). Independence, Academic Freedom and Autonomy. Models of Coordination of Higher Education - In the Margin of Clark Kerr’s Paper. Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, (1), 58–76. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/nsw/article/view/4314

Abstract

Referring to the paper by Clark Kerr in which he distinguishes four aspects of the university independence (property, control, financial sources and mechanisms), the author presents problems arising from looking on Polish system of higher education from the American theoretical perspective. The evolution from the medieval university, through the model of liberal university to the modern university shows a process of gradual arising of system differences between Polish and American institutions. The differences result in misinterpretation of terminology related to the  academic autonomy, independence and freedom. The differences between particular institutions, described by Kerr, can pertain to the whole systems. They are described by four theoretical models of coordination by B. Clark: beaurocratic, political, academic oligarchyand market instruments of their realization and the resulting situation of the universities are also presented. Different consequences of utilization in practice of coordination based on a dominating oligarchy and market model are presented on the example of transformations of the British system. The last section of the paper gives a critical analysis of the direction of transformations of the Polish system which result from new legal regulations and their interpretation, demonstrates its contradictions and lack of consequences as well as possibilities of more coherent solutions.

PDF (Język Polski)

References

Ashby E. 1966 Universities, British, Indian, African. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ashby E. 1971 Any Person Any Study. An Essay on Higher Education in the United States. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Ben-David J. 1971 The Scientists Role in Society. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Ben-David J. 1972 American Higher Education. New York, San Francisco: The Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.

Berdahl R. 1990 Academic freedom. Autonomy and accountahility in british universities. „Studies in Higher Education” 15, nr 2.

Bocheński J.M. 1992 Autonomia uniwersytetu. „Przegląd Akademicki” 5(6) (przedruk wypowiedzi z 1963 roku).

Clark B. 1983 The Higher Education System. Academic Organięation in Cross-National Perspectwe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Classification..., 1981 Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. W: Financing Higher Education: Current Patterns. Paris: OECD.

Jabłecka J. 1979 Przygotowanie, realizacja i ocena reformy instytutowej w szkołach wyższych. Warszawa: Instytut Polityki Naukowej i Szkolnictwa Wyższego.

Kerr C. 1990 The american mixture of higher education in perspective: Four Dimensions. „Higher Education” 19, nr 1.

Perkin H. 1984 The Historical Perspectwe. W: B. Clark (red.): Perspectim on Higher Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Szczepański J. 1976 Szkice o szkolnictwie wyższym. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.

Tymowski J. 1980 Organizacja szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Warszawa: PWN.

Williams G. 1984 The Economic Approach. W: B. Clark (red.) Perspectwes on Higher Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.