How to Cite
Abstract
Since the middle of the eighties changes have been taking place in relations between the state and higher education institutions. Legislative activity has been developing geared to create a new model of management of a higher education institutions. The article explains how scholars of higher education interpret the changes by means of the concept of the evaluating state and managerism. An attempt is also made to answer the question, whether despite the specific features of the historical development and traditional organisational Solutions of the higher educational system of various countries there are common tendencies of changes in management systems. The analysis was limited to the sector of universities and countries that are usually omitted in studies of this kind were used as examples, i.e. Denmark, Norway, Austria as well as the United Kingdom, where these changes started the earliest and are the most radical.
References
Bache P., Maassen P. 1994 Higher Education Policy in Denmark, w: Goedegebuure L., Kaiser F., Maassen P. i in. (eds.): Higher Education Policy. An International Comparative Perspective, Oxford - New York - Seoul - Tokyo, Pergamon Press.
Bast G. 1998 Austria, w: Groof De J., Neave G., Svec J. (eds.): Democracy and Governance in Higher Education, Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 2.
Boer de H., Denters B., Goedegebuure L. 1998 On Boards and Councils; Shaky Balances Considered. The Governance ot Dutch Universities, „Highet Education Policy”, vol. 11, nr 2/3.
Dearlove J. 1998 Fundamental Changes in Institutional Governance Structures: United Kingdom, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 11, nr 2/3.
Dimmen A., KyvikS. 1998 Recent Changes in the Governance of Higher Education in Norway, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 11, nr 2/3.
Groof De J, Meave G, Svec J. (eds.) 1998 Democracy and Gomnance in Higher Education, Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 2.
Jenssen R.K., Vige G.B. 1998 Norway, w: Groof De J., Neave G, Svec J. (eds.): Democracy and Governance in Higher Education, Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 2.
Jorgensen U., Planck J. 1998 Denmark, w: Groof De J., Neave G, Svec J. (eds.): Democracy and Governance in Higher Education, Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 2.
Kells H.R. 1993 The Development of Performance Indicators for Higher Education, Paris, OECD.
Kempson Ch. 1998 United Kingdom, w: Groof De J., Neave G., Svec J. (eds.): Democracy and Governance in Higher Education, Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 2.
Maassen P., Wan Vught F. (eds.) 1997 Inside Academia, Utrecht, De Tijstroon.
Neave G. 1988 On the Cultivation of Quality, Efficiency and Enterprise, An Overview of Recent Trends in Higher Education in Western Europe, „European Journal of Education”, vol. 23, nr 1.
Neave G. 1996 The Evaluation of the Higher Education System in France, w: Cowen R. (ed.): The Evaluation of Higher Education Systems, Kogan Page, London.
University Research... 1998 University Research in Transition. Country Reports, OECD, Paris.
Pechar H., Pellert A. 1998 Managing Change: Organizational Reform in Australian Universities, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 11, nr 2/3.
Rasmussen P. 1995 A Danish Approach to Quality in Education, Conference Papers on Institutional Responses to Quality Assessment, OECD, Paris, 4-6 December 1995.
Rasmussen J.G. 1998 New Rules of University Governance in Denmark, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 11, nr 2/3.
Veldin’t R, Fussel H.P, Neave G. 1996 Relations between State and Higher Education, seria Legislative Reform Programme for Higher Education, Council of Europe, „Kluwer Law International”, vol. 1.
Thume C. 1995 The Balance between Accountability and lmprovement, the Danish Experience, Conference Papers on Institutional Responses to Quality Assessment, Paris, 4-6 December 1995, OECD.
Trow M. 1993 Managerialism and the Academic Profession, the Case of England, „Studies of Higher Education and Research”, nr 4.
Wan Vught F. 1995 The New Context for Academic Quality, w: Diii D., Sporn B. (eds.): Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly, (Mord, Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd.
Williams G 1997 The Market Route to Mass Higher Education: British Experience 1979-1996, „Higher Education Policy”, vol. 10, nr 3/4.
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Julita Jabłecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.