The state’s role in the economy after a crisis the rationale behind it and recommendations

Main Article Content

Marta Götz

Abstrakt

This paper showcases a review of recent approaches towards the state role in the post-crisis economy. The background for the analysis is the support and austerity paradox. A state is supposed to stabilise the economy, stimulate growth and prevent abuses by better supervision, and at the same time to reduce the burden on society by slashing debt. A survey of the selected literature shows that the financial turbulence and recent economic downturn call for more state presence in market processes. There is a rationale behind such interventions, although, given the risks involved, a balanced and prudent approach is required. Recommendations in this respect have been formulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Götz, M. (2015). The state’s role in the economy after a crisis the rationale behind it and recommendations. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, (9), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2015.9.29
Dział
ROZPRAWY I ARTYKUŁY

Referencje

  1. Aleksy-Szucsich A. (2012), Międzynardowe Struktury Produkcji, in: Geoekonomia, ed. E. Haliżak, Wydawnictwo Scholar.
  2. Amden A. H. (2001), The Rise o f the Rest, the challenges to the West from late industrializing economies, Oxford University Press.
  3. Audier A., Bard S., Robieux L. (2014), BCG Perspectives, The Hidden Value in Government Assets, https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/article/public_sector_cost_efficiency_asset_optimization_hidden_value_government_assets/, 22.05.2014).
  4. Baldwin R. E., Evenett S. J. (2012), Beggar-thy-neighbourpolicies during the crisis era: causes, constraints, and lessons fo r maintaining open borders, “Oxford Review of Economic Policy”, vol. 28, no 2, p. 211-234
  5. Brander J., Spencer B. (1985), Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry, “Journal of International Economics”, vol. 8, p. 83-100.
  6. Brenner N., Peck J., Theodore N. (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways, “Global Networks”, vol. 10, no 2, p. 182-222.
  7. BuckF. (2013), Financial Regulation and the Grabbing Hand, CESifo DICE Report 4/2013 (Winter): “Interest Groups and Bank Regulation”, Ifo Institute, Munich, 01-57, p. 3-13.
  8. Callaghan H., Lagneau-Ymonet P. (2014), The Phantom o f Palais Brongniart "Economic Patriotism” and the Paris Stock Exchange, MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/14.
  9. Chwieroth J. (2007), Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets, “International Organization”, vol. 61, p. 443-463.
  10. Cimoli M., Dosi G., Stiglitz J. E. (eds.), (2009), Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation, Oxford University Press, New York.
  11. Clift B., Woll C. (eds.), (2012), Economic patriotism: reinventing control over open markets, “Journal of European Public Policy”, vol. 19, Issue 3, p. 307-323.
  12. Cohen-Setton J. (2014), Infrastructure investment is a no-brainer..., http://www.bruegel.org/nc/blog/detail/article/1457-infrastructure-investment-is-a-no-brainer/, 13.10.2014.
  13. Constâncio V. (2014), Growing out o f the crisis: Is fixing finance enough? speech delivered by, Vice-President of the ECB, at the Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the US and World Economies, Washington D.C., 10.04.2014.
  14. Dale E., Porcaro G. (2014), Juncker’s new start for Europe-a brief summary of past Bruegel research as it relates to Juncker’s new agenda for the European Commission, Bruegel Comment, 23.07.2014.
  15. Doering T. (2014), Von wegen einiges Europa, “Handelsblatt”, 26.05.2014.
  16. European Commission (2011), Trade and Investment Barriers Report 2011 - Engaging our strategic economic partners on improved market access: priorities for action on breaking down barriers to trade, COM (2011) 114.
  17. European Commission (2012), A Stronger European Industry for Growth and Economic Recovery, COM (2012) 582.
  18. European Commission (2014), An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era - Putting Competitiveness and Sustainability at Centre Stage, COM (2014) 614.
  19. European Commission (2014), For a European industrial renaissance, COM (2014) 14/2.
  20. Evenett S. J. (2012), The Landscape o f Crisis-Era Protectionism, http://www.globaltradealert.org/sites/default/files/GTA11_chapter2.pdf, 07.05.2015.
  21. Fontagné L., Mohnen P., Wolff G. (2014), No Industry, No Future?, Les notes du conseil d’analyse économique, French Council of Economic Analysis, no 13.
  22. Giles C., Atkins R., Guha K. (2009), The undeniable shift to Keynes, “The Financial Times”, 23.01.2009.
  23. Gotz M. (2012), Kryzys i przyszłość strefy euro, Wydawnictwo Difin, Warszawa.
  24. Grossman G., Helpman E. (1990), Comparative advantage and long run growth, “American Economic Review”, vol. 80, p. 796-815.
  25. Haliżak E. (eds.), (2012), Geoekonomia, Wydawnictwo Scholar.
  26. Hausmann R. (2014), The Procurement Goldmine, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/government-purchasing-and-innovation-by-ricardo-hausmann-2014-10, 13.10.2014.
  27. Hay C. (2011), Pathology Without Crisis? The Strange Demise of the Anglo-Liberal Growth Model, “Government and Opposition”, vol. 46, no 1, p. 1-31.
  28. Heinemann A. (2015), Government Control o f cross-border M&A: Legitimate Regulation or Protectionism, “Journal of International Economic Law”, vol. 15(3), p. 843-870.
  29. Heymann E. (2013), Europe’s re-industrialisation. The gulf between aspiration and reality, EU Monitor European Integration DB Research, 26.11.2013.
  30. http://marianamazzucato.com/projects/rethinking-the-state/.
  31. Huether M. (2015), Are national champions really winners?, Project Syndicate, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/eu-industrial-policy-questions-by-michael-h-ther-2015-02, 14.02.2015.
  32. IIA Issues Note No. 5, July 2013 UNCTAD.
  33. Jarczewska A. (2012), Dyplomacja ekonomiczna państw, in: Geoekonomia, ed. E. Haliżak, Wydawnictwo Scholar.
  34. Kale S. (2009), A global Keynesian revival, livemint.com in partnership with “The Wall Street Journal”, 21.01.2009.
  35. Kee H. L., Neagu C., Nicita A. (2013), Is protectionism on the rise? Assessing national trade policies during the crisis o f 2008, “Review of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 95(1), p. 342-346.
  36. Mączyńska E. (2011), Dysfunkcje gospodarki w kontekście ekonomii kryzysu, Zeszyty Naukowe nr 9, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, Kraków.
  37. Mazzucato M. (2013), The Entrepreneurial State - Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, Anthem Press.
  38. Monnet E., Pagliari S., Vallée S. (2014), Europe between financial repression and regulatory capture, Bruegel Working Paper, 2014/08, http://www.bruegel.org/publications/publication-detail/publication/838-europe-between-financial-repression-and-regulatory-capture/.
  39. Naczyk M. (2014), Budapest in Warsaw: Central European Business Elites and the Rise of Economic Patriotism Since the Crisis, Sciences Po Paris - Centre d’études européennes; Sciences Po Paris, July 15, 2014
  40. Nowak A., Ryć K. (2013), Europa potrzebuje liberalnego Keynesa, “Rzeczpospolita”, 26.11.2013.
  41. O’Sullivan E., Andreoni A., Lopez-Gomez C., Gregory M. (2013), What is new in the new industrial policy? A manufacturing systems perspective, “Oxford Review of Economic Policy”, vol. 29(2), p. 432-462.
  42. Piketty T. (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Belknap Press.
  43. Pisani-Ferry J. (2015), Reengineering Government, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/govemment-budget-reengmeer-by-jean-pisam-feny-2015-04#Kfpty5tmyGsJ5Dqc.99, 30.04.2015.
  44. Pontusson J., Raess D. (2012), How (and Why) is This Time Different? The Politics of Economic Crisis in Western Europe and the United States, “Annual Review of Political Science”, vol. 15, p. 13-33.
  45. Praet P. (2014), The financial cycle and real convergence in the euro area, speech delivered by Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at the Annual Hyman P. Minsky Conference on the State of the US and World Economies, Washington D.C., 10.04.2014.
  46. Puślecki Z. W. (2001), System środków kontroli handlowej Unii Europejskiej w warunkach globalizacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
  47. Rediker D. A. (2015), State Capitalism by Stealth, the New 21st Century Economic Reality, http://www.piie.com/publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=2781, 16.04.2015.
  48. Rodrik D. (2004), Industrial Policy fo r the Twenty-First Century, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4767, http://ssrn.com/abstract=666808.
  49. Sapir A., Veugelers R. (2013), Opinion Manufacturing Europe’s growth - policies should focus on high-end industries driving productivity growth, Bruegel, 05.11.2013.
  50. Sauvant K. P., McAllister G. (eds.), (2010), Foreign Direct Investments from Emerging Markets. The Challenges Ahead, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  51. Scepanovic V. (2013), FDIas a solution to the challenges of late development: catch-up without convergence?, PhD Thesis, CEU, Budapest College.
  52. Schmalz S., Ebenau M. (2012), After neoliberalism? Brazil, India and China in the global economic crisis, “Globalizations”, vol. 9(4), p. 487-501.
  53. Schuck P. H. (2015), Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better, Princeton University Press.
  54. Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1998), The Grabbing Hand - Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  55. State-owned assets. Setting out the store, “The Economist”, 11.01.2014.
  56. Stopford J. M., Strange S., Henley J. S. (1991), Rival States, Rival Firms Competition for World Market Shares, “Cambridge Studies in International Relations”, no 18, online 2009, p. 1-31.
  57. Szalavetz A. (2015), Post-crisis approaches to state intervention: New developmentalism or industrial policy as usual?, “Competition & Change”, vol. 19(1), p. 70-83.
  58. Tyson L. (2014), The Government as Venture Capitalist, Project Syndicate, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/laura-tyson-shows-how-private-sector-innovation-can-help-to-supplypublic-goods-and-services, 22.11.2014.
  59. Vail M. (2014), Varieties o f Liberalism: Keynesian Responses to the Great Recession in France and Germany, “Governance”, vol. 27(1), p. 63-85.
  60. VeronN. (2014), Even after "Losing”Alstom, http://blogs.piie.com/realtime/?p=4306,05.05.2014.
  61. Warwick K. (2013), Beyond industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Articles No. 2, OECD Publishing, Paris, France, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4869clw0xp-en, 20.01.2014.
  62. Weiss L. (2012), The myth o f the neoliberal state, in: Developmental Politics in Transition: The Neoliberal Era and Beyond, eds. C. Kyung-Sup, B. Fine, L. Weiss, Palgrave-Macmillan, London, UK, p. 27-42.
  63. Wolf C. (1988), Markets or Governments - Choosing between Imperfect Alternatives, MIT Press, Cambridge University.
  64. Wolska G. (2013), Różnice poglądów na temat roli państwa w gospodarce. Poszukiwanie nowego paradygmatu?, IX Kongres Ekonomistów Polskich, http://www.pte.pl/kongres/referaty/Wolska%20Gra%C5%BCyna/Wolska%20Gr%C5%BCyna%20-%20R%C3%93%C5%BBNICE%20POGL%C4%84D%C3%93W0/o20NA%20TEMAT%20ROLI%20P%C5%83STWA%20W%20GOSPODARCE.%20POSZUKIWANIE%20NOWEGO%20PARADYGMATU.pdf.
  65. World Bank's Knowledge 4 Development website - New industrial policy section.
  66. Wróbel A. (2012), Międzynarodowe Struktury Handlu, in: Geoekonomia, eds. E. Haliżak, Wydawnictwo Scholar.
  67. Ząbkowicz A. (2013), Efektywność rynku a sprawność państwa, “Prace i Materiały Instytutu Rozwoju Gospodarczego”, no 92, p. 7-20.