Asserting the leadership in Brexit negotiations
PDF

Keywords

European Parliament
Communication
Institutionalism
Brexitfaced in 2017
proved to be yet another opportunity for EU institutions – the European Parliament
the European Commission and the Council – to engage in sort of a power

How to Cite

NIKLEWICZ, K. (2018). Asserting the leadership in Brexit negotiations. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, (11), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2017.11.17

Abstract

The Brexit negotiations, by far one of the most challenging issues the European Union faced in 2017, proved to be yet another opportunity for EU institutions – the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council – to engage in sort of a power game. Although all three institutions actively took part in it, the European Parliament’s involvement was the most visible and vocal. As it going to be demonstrated, the EP tried to use the Treaty’s Article 50 proceedings to reassert its position within the EU’s institutional framework. It attempted to achieve this goal through purposeful communication, hence fitting the constructivist model of political and institutional agents’ interaction. The European Parliament’s activity may also be analysed in the context of historical institutionalism, explaining Parliament’s specific behaviour: its continuous quest for more power. As the Brexit negotiations have not yet concluded by the time of writing, the author calls for further research on the topic of intra-institutional dynamics. Evidence gathered so far strongly suggest that the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union might permanently influence the relations of power between the major EU institutions.
https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2017.11.17
PDF

References

Barker A., Verhofstadt warns Britain about European Parliament’s Brexit power, “The Financial Times”, https://www.ft.com/content/734494b2-849e-11e6-a29c-6e7d9515ad15, 9 July 2017.

Brexit talks role for Belgian EU veteran Guy Verhofstadt, BBC News, 8 September 2017, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37307203, 9 July 2017.

Brexit: The UK’s letter triggering Article 50, BBC News, 29 March 2017, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-39431070, 4 July 2017.

Carmona J., Cirlig C., Sgueo G. (2017), UK withdrawal from the European Union. Legal and procedural issues, European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, March.

Czaputowicz J. (2007), Teorie stosunków międzynarodowych. Krytyka i systematyzacja, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

European Parliament resolution of 28 June 2016 on the decision to leave the EU resulting from the UK referendum, P8_TA(2016)0294, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0294, 7 July 2017.

European Parliament resolution of 5 April 2017 on negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union, P8_TA-PROV(2017)0102, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8-TA-2017-0102+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN, 12 July 2017.

Guidelines following the United Kingdom notification under Article 50 TUE, EUCO XT 20004/17, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/04/29-euco-brexit-guidelines/, 12 July 2017.

Häge F. M. (2011), Politicising Council Decision-making: the Effect of European Parliament Empowerment, West European Politics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 18–47, January.

Heath R., Eder F. (2016), Brussels power struggle over Brexit negotiations, Politico, 28 June, http://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-power-struggle-over-brexit-negotiations/, 7 July 2017.

Mühlböck M., Rittberger B. (2015), The Council, the European Parliament, and the paradox of interinstitutional cooperation, in: Dynamics of institutional cooperation in the European Union: Dimension and effects, eds. C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker, European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, vol. 19:4.

Palmeri T., Briançon P. (2016), How to annoy a Brit – put a Frenchman in charge of Brexit, Politico, 29 July, http://www.politico.eu/article/michel-barnier-named-as-junckers-brexit-chief-europe-negotiations-consquences-future/, 9 July 2017.

Pollack M. A. (2008), The New Institutionalisms and European Integration, conWEB-webpapers on Constitutionalism and Governance beyond the State, no. 1.

Poptcheva E. (2016), Article 50 TEU: Withdrawalofa Member State from the EU, European Parliamentary Research Service, February, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/577971/EPRS_BRI2016577971_EN.pdf, 7 July 2017.

Pouliot V. (2004), The essence of constructivism, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, vol. 7, no. 3.

Roberts D., Boffey D., Rankin J. (2017), Brexit: David Davis and Michel Barnier begin discussions in Brussels, „The Guardian”, 19 June, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/19/brexit-talks-david-davis-michel-barnier-brussels-uk-eu, 3 July 2017.

Rankin J., Henley J., Oltermann P., Smith H. (2016), EU parliament leader: we want Britain out as soon as possible, “The Guardian”, 24 June 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/24/top-eu-leader-we-want-britain-out-as-soon-as-possible, 6 July 2017.

Teffer P. (2017), MEPs: We’ll veto Brexit deal if citizens’ rights not improved, EUobserver, 10 July, https://euobserver.com/uk-referendum/138470, 10 July 2017.

Wendt A. (2008), Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.