Keywords
deliberative democracy
Village Fund
LEADER
CLLD
Poland
rural development
How to Cite
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive theoretical analysis of two competing philosophies of local governance operating simultaneously in rural Poland: the Village Fund (VF), representing direct participatory democracy, and the LEADER/CLLD approach, embodying deliberative partnership-based governance. Despite both mechanisms’ declarative pursuit of bottom-up development and local empowerment, this study demonstrates their fundamental philosophical divergence. The study uses a Weberian ideal-type methodology for comparison. It shows that although both models pursue local activation, they do so through profoundly different methods rooted in conflicting democratic traditions. The VF puts into practice Barber’s “strong democracy” through its majoritarian village assemblies, while LEADER/CLLD can be seen as the institutional expression of Habermasian deliberative democracy through tri-sectoral partnerships. This divergence extends beyond technical differences to represent competing answers to fundamental questions about legitimate decision-making, the nature of the demos, and the role of citizens in public governance. The article contributes to democratic theory by analyzing how these competing paradigms perform in practice, revealing both their theoretical limitations and potential complementarity within a pluralistic approach to local development.
References
Abramowicz B. (2011), Instytucja zebrania wiejskiego w opinii sołtysów i mieszkańców (Przykład gminy X) [The institution of village assembly in the opinion of village administrators and inhabitants (On the example of the X municipality)], “Wieś i Rolnictwo”, no. 4(153).
Act of 21 February 2014 on the Village Fund [Ustawa z dnia 21 lutego 2014 r. o funduszu sołeckim] (2014), Dz. U. 2014, poz. 301.
Barber B. R. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Biczkowski M. (2020), LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland, “Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development”, no. 24(4).
Bryła J. (2025), Fundusz sołecki – między niedoskonałością legislacyjną a praktyką stosowania [Village fund – between legislative imperfection and practical application], “Studia Prawnoustrojowe”, no. 69.
Bugno-Janik A. (2023), Problemy partycypacji w polskich miastach, „Builder”, no. 5(310).
Cejudo E., Navarro F. (eds.) (2020), Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons, Springer Geography.
Cohen J. (1989), Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, in: The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, eds. A. Hamlin, P. Pettit, Blackwell, Oxford.
De Rubertis S. (2020), Foreword, in: eds. E. Cejudo, F. Navarro, Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons, Springer Geography.
EUR-Lex (2021), Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy (accessed: 18.10.2025).
European Commission (2025), LEADER/CLLD explained. ENRD – European Network for Rural Development, https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/leader_clld-explained_en.pdf, 6.09.2025.
European Committee of the Regions (2025), How post-27 LEADER and CLLD programming could contribute to better implementation of the long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas, https://cor.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions/cdr-2569-2024, 10.10.2025.
Eurostat (2025), Population and social conditions, Demography, population stock and balance, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/, 2.10.2025.
Granovetter M. S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties, “American Journal of Sociology”, no. 78(6).
Gutmann A., Thompson D. (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Habermas J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Trans. W. Rehg, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Jessop B. (2007), The Future of the Capitalist State, Polity Press Cambridge.
Local Action Groups Database (LAG Database), European Network for Rural Development, https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/lag_en.html, 15.09.2025.
Mansbridge J. (1983), Beyond Adversary Democracy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji (2025), Fundusz sołecki [Village Fund], MSWiA, Warsaw, https://www.gov.pl/web/mswia/fundusz-solecki, 1.10.2025.
Pateman C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Ray C. (2006), Neo-endogenous Rural Development in the EU, in: Handbook of Rural Studies, eds. P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. H. Mooney, Sage, London.
Rhodes R. A. W. (1997), Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Open University Press, Buckingham–Philadelphia.
Rhodes R. A. W. (2007), Understanding Governance: Ten Years On, “Organization Studies”, no. 28(8).
Robinson D. L. (2011), Town meeting: practicing democracy in rural New England, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst–Boston.
Rousseau J. J. (1762/1997), The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Ed./trans. V. Gourevitch, University Press Cambridge, Cambridge.
Shucksmith M. (2000), Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: perspectives from Leader in the UK, “Sociologia Ruralis”, no. 40(2).
Shucksmith M. (2010), Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts, “Sociologia Ruralis”, no. 50(1).
Stoker G. (1998), Governance as theory: five propositions, “International Social Science Journal”, no. 50(155).
Trutkowski C., Mandes S. (2005), Kapitał społeczny w małych miastach, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
Torfing J., Peters B. G., Pierre J., Sørensen E. (2012), Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Weber M. (1949), The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Trans./ed. E. A. Shils, H. A. Finch, Free Press, New York.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Krzysztof Duda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.