Abstract
The main research problem of the article consists in a question on the method of supervising implementation of equality and anti-discrimination law by the European Commission in the years 2002–2015. The study showed that the Commission, overseeing implementation of the equality and anti-discrimination law of the EU, used to come out of the role of “the guardian of the treaties” and was discussing problems of infringements in dialogue with Member States. The survey also revealed preferences of the Commission, i.e. greater interest in the two directives (2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC), and less likely to look at the infringement of the principle of equality and non-discrimination from an economic perspective but more in terms of violation of individual rights. Moreover the study revealed that elements of governance could be found in Commission’s activity, namely cooperation with external partners (network of experts) who had resources (information) that the Commission needed for the inspection. Analysis was based onthe quantitative data. The theory of Europeanization has been applied to the analysis.References
Andersen S. (2012), The Enforcement of EU Law: the Role of the European Commission, OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, UK.
Augustyniak Ł. (2014), Postępowanie naruszeniowe jako forma kontroli – nadzór Komisji Europejskiej nad implementacją prawa Unii, „Kontrola Państwowa”, vol. 59, nr 5.
Bonnie A. (2006), The Evolving Role of the European Commission in the Enforcement of Community Law: From Negotiating Compliance to Prosecuting Member States?, „Journal of Contemporary
European Research”, vol. 1, nr 2.
Börzel T. A. (2001), Non-compliance in the European Union: pathology or statistical artifact?, „Journal of European Public Policy”, vol. 8, nr 5.
Drake S., Smith M. (red.) (2016), New Directions in the Effective Enforcement of EU Law and Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Glos, UK.
Exadaktylos T., Radaelli C. M. (2015), Europeanisation, in Research Methods in European Union Studies, red. K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, K. Löfgren, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK.
Hartlapp M., Metz J., Rauh Ch. (2014), Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict inside the European Commission, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Karta Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej (2010), OJ C83/389.
Keck M., Sikkink K. (1998), Activists beyond Borders, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Komisja Europejska, European Commission at work, http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/applying-eu-law/
infringements-proceedings/infringement_decisions/index.cfm?, 8.07.2016.
Radaelli C. M. (2006), Europeanization: solution or problem?, w: European Union Studies, red. M. Cini, A. K. Bourne, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Steunenberg B. (2010), Is big brother watching? Commission oversight of the national implementation of EU directives, „European Union Politics”, vol. 11, nr 3.
Tallberg J. (2002), Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union, „International Organization”, vol. 56, nr 3.
Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, wersja skonsolidowana (2012), OJ C 326.
Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, wersja skonsolidowana (2012), OJ C 326.
Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej (1977), Wyrok Ruckdeschel i in. przeciwko Hauptzollamt Hamburg-St. Annen, 117/76 i 16/77, EU:C:1977:160.
Versaluis E., van Keulen M., Stephenson P. (2011), Analyzing the European Union Policy Process, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.