Słowa kluczowe
cooperation
MedTech
clusters
ecosystems
Regional Innovation Systems
S3
sustainable transition
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
In the paper, we analyse trends that impact the transition of the MedTech clusters in Europe to formulate growth scenarios and propose associated policy measures addressing the MedTech ecosystems while on their way to supporting Sustainable Devel- opment Goals. The study directly builds on the lessons learned within the S3martMed alliance, grouping the renowned European cluster organisations in MedTech. The re- search-oriented objectives of the paper are (i) to present the scenario method as a col- laborative, knowledge-enabling tool for clusters and cluster policies and (ii) to identify contemporary scenarios for the MedTech sector willing to add value to transition paths of Regional Innovation Systems. Thus, the presented method and the paper itself are not retrospective but future-oriented to envisage new opportunities for SMEs, business support organisations, RTOs, and the users of MedTech products and services. The pa- per posits that sustainable ecosystems can be fostered by collaborative achievements of MedTech stakeholders on the condition that they keep on foreseeing the external driving forces to help policymakers to converge them into evidence-based policies.
Bibliografia
Adelman C. 1993. Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research. Educational Action Research, 1, 1: 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102
Asheim B.T., Isaksen A., Trippl M. 2020. The role of the Regional Innovation System approach in contemporary regional policy: is it still relevant in a globalised world? [In:] M. González-López et al. (eds.), Regions and Innovation Policies in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, p. 12-29. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904161.00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904161.00006
Asheim B.T., Boschma R., Cooke P. 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Reg. Stud., 45: 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
Barca F., McCann Ph., Rodríguez-Pose A. 2012. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches. J. of Reg. Sci., 52(1): 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
Baum F., MacDougall C., Smith D. 2006. Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10): 854-857. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662
Bellandi M., De Propris L. 2021. Local Productive Systems' Transitions to Industry 4.0+. Sustainability, 13(23), 13052: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313052
Béné C., Newsham A., Davies M., Ulrichs M., Godfrey-Wood R. 2014. Review article: Resilience, poverty, and development. J. Int. Dev., 26: 598-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2992
Chaminade C., Bellandi M., Plechero M., Santini E. 2019. Understanding processes of path renewal and creation in thick specialized regional innovation systems. Evidence from two textile districts in Italy and Sweden. Europ. Pl. Stud., 27, 10: 1978-1994. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1610727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1610727
Chaminade C., Randelli F. 2020. The Role of Territorially Embedded Innovation Ecosystems Accelerating Sustainability Transformations: A Case Study of the Transformation to Organic Wine Production in Tuscany (Italy). Sustainability, 12, 4621: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114621
Churski P., Kociuba D., Ochojski A., Polko A. 2017. Towards Policy - Place-Based Policy and Smart Specialisation. [In:] K. Kopczewska et al. (eds), Measuring Regional Specialisation. Palgrave, Cham., Switzerland, p. 267-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51505-2_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51505-2_5
Croese S., Green C., Morgan G. 2020 Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals Through the Lens of Urban Resilience: Lessons and Learnings from 100 Resilient Cities and Cape Town. Sustainability, 12(2), 550: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020550
Foray D. 2014. From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 4: 492-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. 2009. Smart specialisation - the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9(85): 1-5.
Foray D., Eichler M., Keller M. 2021. Smart specialization strategies - insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 2: 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z
Gassmann O., Enkel E. 2004. Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 6-9.
Gerstlberger W. 2004. Regional innovation systems and sustainability - selected examples of international discussion. Technovation, 24: 749-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00152-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00152-9
Godet M. 1982. From forecasting to 'la prospective' a new way of looking at futures. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 3: 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980010308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980010308
Godet M., Roubelat F. 1996. Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios. Long Range Planning, 29, 2: 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00004-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00004-0
Hawken S., Rahmat H., Sepasgozar S.M.E., Zhang K. 2021. The SDGs, Ecosystem Services and Cities: A Network Analysis of Current Research Innovation for Implementing Urban Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(24), 14057: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414057
The territorial impact of COVID-19: managing the crisis across levels of government. OECD 2020 (https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-covid-19-managing-the-crisis-across-levels-of-government-d3e314e1/; accessed: 12.11.2021).
Hege E., Brimont L., Pagnon F. 2019. Sustainable development goals and indicators: can they be tools to make national budgets more sustainable? Public Sector Economics, 43: 423-444. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.43.4.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.43.4.5
https://www.medtecheurope.org/resource-library/medtech-europes-facts-and-figures-2021/ (accessed: 10.01.2022).
Ibn-Mohammed T., Mustapha K.B., Godsell J., Adamu Z., Babatunde K.A., Akintade D.D., Acquaye A., Fujii H., Ndiaye M.M., Yamoah F.A., Koh S. 2021. A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 164: 105169 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
Kebir L., Crevoisier O., Costa P., Peyrache-Gadeau V. (eds) 2017. Sustainable innovation and regional development: rethinking innovative milieus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712211
Komninos N., Panori A. 2019. The creation of city smartness: architectures of intelligence in smart cities and smart ecosystems. In Smart Cities in the Post-Algorithmic Era. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, p. 101-127. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907056.00012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907056.00012
Lewin K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 4: 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Lin H.-P., Hu T.-S. 2017. Knowledge Interaction and Spatial Dynamics in Industrial Districts. Sustainability, 9, 1421: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081421
March J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Mazzucato M. 2018. The Value of Everything. Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Penguin Books, New York, USA.
Nakicenovic N., Zimm C., Matusiak M., Ciampi Stancova K. 2021. Smart Specialisation, Sustainable Development Goals and Environmental Commons. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Perveen S., Yigitcanlar T., Kamruzzaman Md., Hayes J. 2017. Evaluating transport externalities of urban growth: a critical review of scenario-based planning methods. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 14: 663-678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1144-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1144-7
Prospective stratégique pour les entreprises et les territoires. 2008. Editions Dunod.
Sachs J.D., Schmidt-Traub G., Mazzucato M., Messner D., Nakicenovic N., Rockström J. 2019. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2: 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Schoemaker P. 1993. Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strateg. Manag. J., 14: 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140304
SDG Report 2019. 2019. The future is now. Science for achieving sustainable development. Global sustainable Development Report. United Nations.
Teece D. 2007. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strateg. Manag. J., 28(13): 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strateg. Manag. J., 18(7): 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tereshko E., Gintciak A. 2020. Regional Innovation System in Context of Pandemic COVID-19, DTMIS '20: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference - Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Service, Article No. 58: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446434.3446516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3446434.3446516
The territorial impact of COVID-19: managing the crisis across levels of government. OECD 2020 (https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-territorial-impact-of-covid-19-managing-the-crisis-across-levels-of-government-d3e314e1/; accessed: 12.11.2021).
Tournier G. 1961. Gaston Berger et la prospective. Les Études Philosophiques, 16(4): 379-388.
Vázquez-Barquero A. 1999. Inward Investment and Endogenous Development. The Convergence of the Strategies of Large Firms and Territories? Entrep. & Reg. Dev., 11(1): 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283308
Wang C.L., Ahmed P.K. 2007. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. Int. J. of Manag. Rev., 9(1): 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
Zinkernagel R., Evans J., Neij L. 2018. Applying the SDGs to cities: Business as usual or a new dawn? Sustainability, 10, 3201: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093201
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Artur Ochojski, Marcin Baron
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.