Keywords
consultocracy
local development
regeneration
wielkopolskie voivodship
How to Cite
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify and assess the role of consultants in regeneration programming in Poland. In pursuing this objective an attempt is made to answer the questions: (1) What is the scope for local authorities to prepare regeneration programmes themselves? and (2) What is the actual position of consultants in the decision making process of municipal regeneration policy? The results of the research carried out in the Wielkopolskie voivodship indicate the widespread use of consultants in regeneration programming, which is facilitated by the organisational structures of offices where there are no units dealing exclusively with regeneration. However, the use of consultants is mainly determined by: 1) Outside view and neutrality of consultants, 2) Experience and wide expertise of consultants, 3) Shortage of staff in offices. 4) Avoidance of responsibility by officials. As a result, based on the information collected, it can be concluded that consultants are the real decision-makers in the field of regeneration in municipalities. It is their advice that is crucial to the selection of regeneration areas, the types of regeneration projects and the way in which the whole regeneration process is managed. Key decisions are therefore made on the basis of their knowledge and experience.
Funding
Praca została sfinansowana przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki w ramach grantu 2023/51/B/HS4/00581.
References
Babbie E. 2007. Badania społeczne w praktyce. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ball M. 2008. Markets and institutions in real estate and construction. John Wiley and Sons.
Barbanente A., Caruso N., Grassini L., Pede E. 2022. Innovation dynamics in regional policies for urban regeneration: experiences from Italy. Planning Practice and Research, 37(6): 673-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.2018172
Bednarowska Z. 2015. Desk research – wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych. Marketing i Rynek, 7: 18-26.
Brint S. 1990. Rethinking the policy influence of experts: From general characterisations to analysis of variation. Sociological Forum, 5(3): 361-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115092
Churchill G.A. 2002. Badania marketingowe. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ciesiółka P. 2010. Urban renewal in Poznań – the effect of the use of the European Union funds. Polska Akademia Nauk, Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, Studia Regionalia, 27: 205-212.
Ciesiółka P. 2017. Rewitalizacja w polityce rozwoju kraju. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 39: 9-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2017.39.01
Ciesiółka P. 2023. Rola partycypacji społecznej w procesie rewitalizacji na przykładzie gmin z województwa wielkopolskiego. [W:] M. Marciniak, C. Trosiak, B. Hordecki (red.), Partycypacja społeczna – inspiracje, uwarunkowania, perspektywy. 25 lat działalności Stowarzyszenia Oświatowego im. Dezyderego Chłapowskiego w Kościanie. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań, s. 101-116.
Craig D., Brooks R. 2006. Plundering the public sector. Constable and Robinson, London, UK.
Deakin M., Allwinkle S. 2007. Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: The role of networks, innovation, and creativity in building successful partnerships. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(1): 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630730701260118
Dobbin F., Simmons B., Garrett G. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1): 449-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507
dos Santos Figueiredo Y.D., Prim M.A., Dandolini G.A. 2022. Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy, 113: 105873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873
Du Gay P. 2000. In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. Sage, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217580
Engwall L., Kipping M., Üsdiken B. 2016. Defining management: Business schools, consultants, media. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851921
Gminny Program Rewitalizacji Praktyczny Poradnik dla Mieszkańców i Władz Lokalnych 2018. Ministerstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej
Hlaváček P., Raška P., Balej M. 2016. Regeneration projects in Central and Eastern European post-communist cities: Current trends and community needs. Habitat International, 56: 31-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.04.001
Hood C., Jackson M. 1991. Administrative argument. Dartmouth, Aldershot, UK.
Hołuj D., Legutko-Kobus P. 2018. Partycypacja jako element rewitalizacji (przykłady miast z województwa małopolskiego i mazowieckiego). Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 365: 93-119.
Jadach-Sepioło A., Krystek-Kucewicz B., Lechman G., Matuszko A., Muszyńska-Jeleszyńska D., Ogrodowski J., Tomczyk E. 2018. Gminny program rewitalizacji. Ministerstwo Inwestycji i Rozwoju.
Kaczmarek S., Marcinczak S. 2013. The blessing in disguise: urban regeneration in Poland in a neo-liberal milieu. [W:] M.E. Leary, J. McCarthy (red.), The Routledge companion to urban regeneration. Routledge, s. 98-106.
Martin J.F. 1998. Reorienting a nation: Consultants and Australian public policy. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
McCann E.J. 2001. Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. The Professional Geographer, 53(2): 207-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00280
McLean B.L., Borén T. 2015. Barriers to implementing sustainability locally: A case study of policy immobilities. Local Environment, 20(12): 1489-1506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.909798
Nowak M.J., Mitrea A., Lukstiņa G., Jukneliene D., Jürgenson E., Filepné Kovács K., … Blaszke M. 2024. Directions of change in spatial planning systems in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989. Planning Practice and Research, s. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2024.2407229
Parysek J. 2010. Rola planowania w rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczym i przestrzennym miast polskich po 1989 roku. Studia Miejskie, 1: 14-28.
Raudla R. 2013. Fiscal retrenchment in Estonia during the financial crisis: The role of institutional factors. Public Administration, 91(1): 32-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01963.x
Rewitalizacja w Polsce. Pierwsze obserwacje i wnioski. 2018. Ministerstwo Inwestycji i Rozwoju
Saint-Martin D. 1998. The new managerialism and the policy influence of consultants in government: An historical-institutionalist analysis of Britain, Canada and France. Governance, 11(3): 319-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00074
Scott J.W., Kühn M. 2012. Urban change and urban development strategies in Central East Europe: A selective assessment of events since 1989. European Planning Studies, 20(7): 1093-1109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.674345
Stone D., Pal L.A., de Oliveira O.P. 2021. Private consultants and policy advisory organisations: a blind spot on policy transfer research. [W:] O. Porto de Oliveira (red.), Handbook of policy transfer, diffusion and circulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, s. 173-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905601.00017
Temenos C., Lauermann J. 2020. The urban politics of policy failure. Urban Geography, 41(9): 1109-1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1827194
Ustawa z dnia 9 października 2015 roku o rewitalizacji.
Vogelpohl A. 2018. Consulting as a threat to local democracy? Flexible management consultants, pacified citizens, and political tactics of strategic development in German cities. Urban Geography, 39(9): 1345-1365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1452872
Ylönen M., Kuusela H. 2018. Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda. Governance, 32(2): 241-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12369
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Przemysław Ciesiółka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.