Keywords
urban project
policy tools
local governance
urban studies
How to Cite
Abstract
Which is the added-value of the international action of cities? Is this action legitimate? Our analysis proposes to invert the famous slogan and get local authorities to think local and act global. This reversed framework, that we may call “new urban diplomacy” focuses on governance and more specifically in the urban project, understood as the policy agenda of the city council. Based on active subsidiarity, local development moves through new urban diplomacy to a foreground where European policies are a tactical choice among other planning tools. Thus, in order to explore how this framework works, our analysis will examine three categories of instruments: programming, communication and representation, notwithstanding with the role of city networks. Our proposal to structure this new urban diplomacy is the result of a process of participatory observation (almost 15 years) supported by grounded theory. Three main approaches of the international role of cities rooted our analysis: economic (global cities, city branding), political (governance, international relations) and geographical (territorial development, urban planning). So as to define the contours of new urban diplomacy as a lever for the urban project, this proposal presents three main indicators (capacity, intensity and coordination) and three possible scenarios (the bywatcher, the silent silo and the strategist). Our results highlight two key factors: one external (the europeanisation processes of local authorities) and another internal (talent, perceived both as the implication of the municipality and the creation of a local think tank, that we called Noodle). Our final goal is to offer a guide for analysis and further research. This guide should also serve cities in search of additional tools for their urban project.
References
Acuto M. 2013. Global cities, governance and diplomacy: the Urban link. Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073810
Aldecoa F., Keating M. 1999. Paradiplomacy in action: the foreign relations of subnational governments. Cass, London.
Amiri S., Sevin E. (eds) 2020. City diplomacy: current trends and future prospects. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3
Armondi S. 2019. The urban agenda for the European Union: EU governmentality and urban sovereignty in new EU-city relations? [In:] S. Armondi, S. De Gregorio Hurtado (eds), Foregrounding urban agendas. The new urban issue in European experiences of policy-making. The Urban book series, Cham, p. 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29073-3_1
Barber B.R. 2013. If mayors ruled the world: dysfunctional nations, rising cities. University Press, Yale.
Bassens D. et al. (eds) 2018. The city as a global political actor. 1st ed. Routledge, New York.
Bhagwati J. 1995. US trade policy: the infatuation with free trade agreements. [In:] J. Bhagwati J., A.O. Krueger, The dangerous drift to preferential trade agreements. AEI Press, Washington, DC, p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331653.003.0001
Bitsch V. 2005. Qualitative research: a grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness, 23 (345-2016-15096): 5-91.
Boulineau E. 2017. Towards a political geography of territorial cooperation: transnational regions and city networks. Perspective. L’Espace Politique, 32 (http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/5407). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.5407
Calamé P. 2016. La gestion des relations entre échelles de gouvernance et le principe de subsidiarité active. Centre National de la Fonction Publique Territoriale (CNFPT) (www.citego.org/bdf_dossier-128_fr.html).
Ciattoni A., Veyret Y. 2018. Les fondamentaux de la géographie. 4e Éd. Armand Colin, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.delle.2018.01
Courlet C., Pecqueur B. 2013. L’économie territoriale. Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
Cull N.J. 2008. Public diplomacy: taxonomies and histories. Annals – American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616: 31-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952
Curtis S. 2011. Global cities and the transformation of the international system. Review of International Studies, 37(4): 1923-1947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001099
De Gregorio S. 2018. The EU urban policy in the period 2007-13: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Regional Science, 5, 1: 212-230 (https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480903). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480903
Dossi S. 2012. Cities and the European Union: Mechanisms and modes of europeanization in the city of Turin. European Studies. PhD Thesis University of Exeter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005090_9
Escach N. 2014. Réseaux de villes et recompositions interterritoriales dans l’espace baltique Geography. PhD Thesis. École normale supérieure, Lyon.
Espiñeira-Guirao T. 2020 Strategies for enhancing EU city diplomacy. [In:] S. Amiri, E. Sevin (eds), City Diplomacy: current trends and future prospects. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_10
Espiñeira-Guirao T. 2021. La diplomatie urbaine européenne: une approche par les instruments (European urban diplomacy: a tool-based approach). Geography. PhD Thesis. Rennes 2 University, 2021. French (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03241695v1).
Fernández de Losada A., Abdullah H. 2019. Rethinking the ecosystem of international city networks: challenges and opportunities. Monografias CIDOB 72.
Faludi A. 2002. European spatial planning. Lincoln institute of Land policy. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022000013284
Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Goldsmith M. 1993. The europeanisation of local government. Urban Studies, 30(4-5): 683-699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320081871
Hooghe L., Marks G. 2002. Types of multi-level governance. SSRN Electronic Journal (http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=302786). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302786
Joannides V., Berland N. 2008. Grounded theory: quels usages dans les recherches en contrôle de gestion? Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 14(3): 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.143.0141
Kavaratzis M. 2004. From city marketing to city branding: towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1(1): 58-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990005
Kern K., Bulkeley H. 2009. Cities, europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2): 309-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00806.x
Kihlgren Grandi L. 2020. City diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60717-3
La Porte T. 2013. City public diplomacy in the European Union. [In:] European Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. New York, p. 85-111 (https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315144_5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315144_5
Lara Pacheco R.F. 2019. La inserción de las ciudades en el medio internacional. Una revisión histórica, teórica y empírica desde las relaciones internacionales. Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara DOI: https://doi.org/10.17103/redi.71.2.2019.1.09
Lascoumes P. 2008. Les instruments d’action publique, traceurs de changement: L’exemple des transformations de la politique française de lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique (1961-2006). Politique et Sociétés, 26(2-3): 73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/017664ar
Le Galès P. 2003. Le retour des villes européennes, sociétés urbaines, mondialisation, gouvernement et gouvernance. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.
Masboungi A. 2005. Bilbao: la culture comme projet de ville. Editions de la Villette, Paris.
Mead M. 1928. Coming of age in Samoa: A Psychological Study of Primitive Youth for Western Civilisation. William Morrow & Co., New York.
Mocca E. 2015. The politics of transnational municipalism for sustainable development in the European union. An urban analysis. Business, Arts and Social Sciences. PhD Thesis. Brunel University.
Plangger M. 2018. Building something beautiful with stones: how regions adapt to, shape and transform the EU opportunity structure. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(1): 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1354851
Pinson G. 2009. Gouverner la ville par projet: urbanisme et gouvernance des villes européennes. Presses de Science Po, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.pinso.2009.01
Purkarthofer E. 2019. Investigating the partnership approach in the EU Urban Agenda from the perspective of soft planning. European Planning Studies, 27(1): 86-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1527294
Sassen S. 1991. The global city. Princeton University Press, New York.
Scott A.J. 2010. Creative cities: The role of culture. Revue d’économie politique, 120: 181-204 (https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.201.0181). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.201.0181
Soldatos P. 1996. La nouvelle génération de villes internationales: phénomène de segmentation des roles traditionnels de l’état-nation. [In:] C. Philip, P. Soldatos, Au-delà et en decà de l’Etat-nation. Bruylant, Brussels.
Steyn B. 2003. From strategy to corporate communication strategy: a conceptualisation. Journal of Communication Management, 8(2): 168-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540410807637
Swyngedouw E. 2004. Globalisation or “Glocalisation”? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1): 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000203632
Tatham M. 2008. Going solo: direct regional representation in the european union. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5): 493-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351523
Troy J. 2018. The Power of the political in an urbanizing international. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3034363
van der Pluijm R., Melissen J. 2007. City diplomacy: the expanding role of cities in international politics. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. The Hague.
Viltard Y. 2008. Conceptualiser la «diplomatie des villes»: Ou l’obligation faite aux relations internationales de penser l’action extérieure des gouvernements locaux. Revue française de science politique, 58(3): 511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.583.0511
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tamara Espiñeira-Guirao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.