Cultural dimensions and dilemmas of revitalization of postindustrial areas and facilities. From industrial culture to cultural industries in selected places in Upper Silesia
Journal cover , no. 73, year 2025
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

culture
revitalization
gentrification
objectification
aestheticization

How to Cite

Lipski, A. (2025). Cultural dimensions and dilemmas of revitalization of postindustrial areas and facilities. From industrial culture to cultural industries in selected places in Upper Silesia. Rozwój Regionalny I Polityka Regionalna, 18(73), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2025.73.09

Abstract

The topic of revitalization operates within the framework of two opposing positions – defenders and critics of its results – whose antagonism makes it difficult to formulate a balanced and impartial opinion on its effects. The article is an attempt to confront them. The complexity and ambiguity of revitalization is demonstrated by the concept of culture-led regeneration (CLR), in which culture is understood in a standard way: selective and normative. CLR is shown here on the example of post-industrial areas and facilities in Upper Silesia, which were subjected to economic instrumentalization, aestheticization and marketing management, replacing industrial culture with cultural industries. On the one hand, CLR leads to the modernization of degraded objects and spaces, improvement of living conditions, protection of the remains of traditional industrial culture (material and immaterial), but on the other hand, to the irreversible loss of its authentic character as a result of its commercialization, museification and theatricalization. An illustrative case study for CLR is the Nikiszowiec workers’ estate in Katowice. With the progressing deindustrialization and then CLR processes, the original life world of indigenous inhabitants (Lebenswelt) was colonized by institutions and mechanisms of a social system alien to it. Gentrification increased the standard of living and safety in the estate, enriched its infrastructure and the scope of public services (also in the area of cultural institutions and events), but at the same time contributed to socio-spatial segregation and the displacement of former residents by new, more wealthy users (including representatives of the so-called creative class) and the transformation of Nikiszowiec into an eclectic creation, which is a combination of – mythologized in marketing materials as a place of special aura – a mannerist openair museum (tourist attraction) and an object of a prosaic market game.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2025.73.09
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Arts and Economic Prosperity 5. The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts & Cultural Organizations & Their Audiences 2016. Americans for the Arts (https://www.americansforthearts.org dostęp: 10.05.2024).

Baudrillard J. 2005. Symulakry i symulacje. Sic!, Warszawa.

Belfiore E., Gibson L. 2019. Reading the Present Through the Past: A Critical Introduction. [W]: E. Belfiore, L. Gibson (red.), Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance. London, s. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55027-9_1

Brooks D. 2021. How the Bobos Broke America. „The Atlantic” September (https://www.theatlantic.com dostęp: 24.11.2021).

Chaskin R., Joseph M. 2013. “Positive” Gentrification, Social Control and the “Right to the City” in Mixed-Income Communities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2): 480-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01158.x

Craik J. 2007. Re-visioning Arts and Cultural Policy: Current Impasses and Future Directions. ANU Press, Canberra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_459486

Culture and Public Policy. For Sustainable Development. 2019. Unesco, Paris.

Culture-led regeneration. 2024. LCA (https://www.local.gov.uk ; dostęp: 10.05.2024).

Culture Urban Future. Global Report on Culture for Sustainable Urban Development. 2016. UNESCO, Paris.

Duxbury N. i in. 2016. Culture in Urban Development Policies. [W]: Culture: Urban Future. Global Report on Culture for Sustainable Urban Development. Unesco, Paris.

Edensor T., Millington S. 2019. Spaces of vernacular creativity reconsidered. [W]: C. Courage, A. McKeown (red.), Creative Placemaking: Research, Theory and Practice. London, s. 28-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104607-3

Ennis N., Douglass G. 2011. Culture and regeneration – What evidence is there of a link and how can it be measured? Greater London Authority, London.

Evans G. 2005. Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 959-983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107102

Featherstone M. 2007. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. Sage Publications, Los Angeles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212424

Florida R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York.

Florida R. 2017. The New Urban Crisis: Gentrification, Housing Bubbles, Growing Inequality, and What We Can Do About It. Oneworld, London.

Freire J. 2018. Impact of place brand names on destination image. International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing, 6(1): 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLTM.2018.089223

Garcia B. 2012. What is culture-led regeneration? (https://www.culturefighter.eu ; dostęp: 10.05.2024).

Gibson C., Kong L. 2005. Cultural Economy: A Critical Review. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5): 541-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa

Gibson-Graham J.K. 2014. Rethinking the Economy with Thick Description and Weak Theory. Current Anthropology, 55(9): 147-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/676646

Godart F. i in. 2020. The Sociology of Creativity: Elements, Structures, and Audiences. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1): 489-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054833

Grodach C. 2013. Cultural Economy Planning in Creative Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5): 1747-1765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01165.x

Grodach C., Loukaitou-Sideris A. 2007. Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(4): 349-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701683235

Habermas J. 2002. Teoria działania komunikacyjnego. T. 2. PWN, Warszawa.

Hackworth J., Smith N. 2001. The Changing State of Gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(4): 464-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00172

Harvey D. 2003. The Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4): 939-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x

Hawkes J. 2001. The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. Common Ground Publishing, Melbourne.

Hawkins H., Price L. 2018. Towards the geographies of making: an introduction. [W]: L. Price, H. Hawkins (red.), Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity. Routledge, London, s. 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315296937-1

Jameson F. 1987. Postmodernism and Consumer Society. [W:] H. Foster (red.), The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture, Seattle, s. 111-125.

Jones Z., Zhang X. 2024. Identifying the role of industrial heritage in the European Capital of Culture programme. Built Heritage, 8(20): 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00133-4

Kacerauskas T. 2020. Creative Economy and the Idea of the Creative Society. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(1): 43-52.

Kennedy P. 2020. ‘All the better to eat you with!’ The contribution of consumer culture to the rise of predatory capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(3): 266-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540519875993

Kisiel P. 2019. Unwanted inheritance? Industrial past as the EU heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(7): 652-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1678053

Kopytoff I. 2014. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commodization as Process. [W:] A. Appadurai (red.), The Social Life of Things. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 64-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004

Landry C. 2008. The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Routledge, London.

Lash S., Urry J. 2002. Economies of Signs and Space. Sage Publications, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280539

Le Grand E. 2020. Representing the middle-class ‘hipster’. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(2): 184-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418772168

Lengyel J. i in. 2022. Multivariate analysis of socioeconomic profiles in the Ruhr area. Journal of Maps, 18(3): 576-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2022.2098839

Lipski A. 2016. Ekonomizacja rewitalizacji i jej ukryte wymiary. Synthesis. Publication of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3: 191-208.

Lipski A. 2018. Kultura jako problem teorii i praktyki polityki społecznej z perspektywy socjoekonomicznej. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 2: 257-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2018.80.2.18

Lipski A. 2023. Polityka kulturalna wobec wyzwań nowoczesnego społeczeństwa rynkowego. Wyd. UE w Katowicach, Katowice.

Markusen A. i in. 2008. Defining the Creative Economy: Industry and Occupational Approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(1): 24-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242407311862

McCarthy J., Pollock A. 1997. Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Dundee. Land Use Policy, 14(2): 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(96)00037-3

Miles A., Gibson L. 2016. Everyday participation and cultural value. Cultural Trends, 25(3), 1: 151-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2016.1204043

Miles A., Gibson L. 2017. Everyday participation and cultural value place. Cultural Trends, 26(1), 2: 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1275129

Miles M. 2013. A post-creative city? RCCS Annual Review, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.506

Miles S. 2005. “Our Tyne”: Iconic Regeneration and the Revitalisation of Identity in Newcastle-Gateshead. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 913-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107326

Miles S. 2020. Consuming culture-led regeneration: the rise and fall of the democratic urban experience. Space and Polity, 24(2): 210-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1775573

Miles S. 2021. The Experience Society. Consumer Capitalism Rebooted. Pluto Press, London.

Miles S., Paddison R. 2005. The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5/6): 833-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107508

Molotch H. 2002. Place in product. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4): 665-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00410

Monitoring the twin transition of industrial ecosystems. Cultural and creative industries. Analytical report. 2023. EU Commission, Brussels.

Mulcahy K. 2019. Combating Coloniality: the cultural policy of post-colonialism. Políticas Culturais em Revista, 12(1): 228-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/pcr.v12i1.30433

Newbigin J. 2016. What is the creative economy? [W]: J. Newbigin (red.), New and changing dynamics. How the global creative economy is evolving. British Council, London.

Oliveira C., Breda-Vázquez I. 2012. Creativity and Social Innovation: What Can Urban Policies Learn from Sectoral Experiences? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3): 522-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01024.x

Paddison R. 2009. Some Reflections on the Limitations to Public Participation in the Post-Political City. L’Espace politique, 8(2): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.1393

Pink S. 2012. Situating Everyday Life. Practices and Places. SAGE, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250679

Platt L. 2019. Crafting place: Women’s everyday creativity in placemaking processes. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(3), 362-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417722090

Pratt A. 2008. Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, B, 90(2): 107-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x

Quinn B. 2005. Arts Festivals and the City. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 927-943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107250

Regionalna Polityka Rewitalizacji Województwa Śląskiego. 2022. Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Śląskiego, Katowice.

Regionalny Program Operacyjny Woj. Śląskiego na lata 2014-20. 2024. Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Śląskiego, Katowice.

Ritzer G., Miles S. 2019. The changing nature of consumption and the intensification of McDonaldization in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(1): 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518818628

RPO WSL 2007-2013 na mecie. 2018 (https://rpo.slaskie.pl ; dostęp: 10.12.2024).

Scott A.J. 2014. Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism. Regional Studies, 48(4): 565-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.891010

Strategia Rozwoju Województwa Śląskiego „Śląskie 2030”. 2020. Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Śląskiego, Katowice.

Ustawa z dnia 9 października 2015 o rewitalizacji (Dz.U. z 2015 r. poz. 1777).

van Iersel M. 2010. Who cares about UNESCO? (https://voxeurop.eu ; dostęp: 12. 07.2023).

Vickery J. 2007. The Emergence of Culture-led Regeneration: A policy concept and its discontents. University of Warwick, Coventry.

Welsch W. 2017. Ästhetiches Denken. Reclam, Stuttgart.

Williams R. 2004. The anxious city: English urbanism in the late twentieth century. Routledge, London.

Yeoh B. 2005. The Global Cultural City? Spatial Imagineering and Politics in the (Multi)cultural Marketplaces of South-east Asia. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 945-998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107201

Zukin S. 1995. The Cultures of Cities. Blackwell, Cambridge.