Unlocking lock-in. Emergence, perpetuation and decline of regional entrepreneurship in transitional societies: examples from contemporary Poland
Journal cover , volume 18, no. 74, year 2025, title Regional Development and Regional Policy
PDF

Keywords

Regional Entrepreneurship
Lock-in
Strategy-as-Practice
Evolutionary Economic Geography
Transitional Societies

How to Cite

Simborowski, G., & Kłobukowski, P. (2025). Unlocking lock-in. Emergence, perpetuation and decline of regional entrepreneurship in transitional societies: examples from contemporary Poland. Rozwój Regionalny I Polityka Regionalna, (74), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2025.74.04

Abstract

This paper examines how the phenomenon of lock-in can initially stimulate entrepreneurship and path creation in transitional societies but eventually impede municipal development. Focusing on three Polish municipalities – Łeba, Łęknica, and Tarnowo Podgórne – we investigate the factors that contribute to the persistence of lock-in and explore strategies to overcome it. Using qualitative analysis grounded in interviews with entrepreneurs, municipal authorities, and residents, and drawing on evolutionary economic geography, neo-institutionalism theory, and the strategy-as-practice approach, we analyze the interplay between geohistorical factors, entrepreneurial practices, and local government legitimacy. Our findings reveal that proactive entrepreneurs, when supported by responsive local governments, can redefine development strategies, foster diversification, and effectively break the lock-in cycle. This study underscores the critical role of collaborative efforts between entrepreneurs and municipal authorities in transforming regional development paths, offering valuable insights for policymakers in transitional economies.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2025.74.04
PDF

References

Arthur W.B. 1989. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99(394): 116-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208

Arthur W.B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10029

Barnett J., Evans L.S., Gross C., Kiem A.S., Kingsford R.T., Palutikof J.P., Pickering C.M., Smithers S.G. 2015. From barriers to limits to climate change adaptation: Path dependency and the speed of change. Ecology and Society, 20(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07698-200305

Benner M. 2022a. Legitimizing path development by interlinking institutional logics: The case of Israel’s desert tourism. Local Economy, 37, 7: 564-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942231172728

Benner M. 2022b. Retheorizing industrial-institutional coevolution: A multidimensional perspective. Regional Studies, 56, 9: 1524-1537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1949441

Boschma R., Coenen L., Frenken K., Truffer B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies. Regional Studies, 51(1): 31-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460

Boschma R., Minondo A., Navarro M. 2013. The Emergence of New Industries at the Regional Level in Spain: A Proximity Approach Based on Product Relatedness. Economic Geography, 89(1): 29-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x

Chia R., Rasche A. 2015. Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: Building and dwelling worldviews. [In:] D. Golsorkhi, D. Seidl, E. Vaara, L. Rouleau (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, p. 44-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139681032.003

Churski P., Kaczmarek T. (Eds.) 2022. Three Decades of Polish Socio-Economic Transformations: Geographical Perspectives. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06108-0

Corradini C., Vanino E. 2022. Path dependency, regional variety and the dynamics of new firm creation in rooted and pioneering industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 22(3): 631-651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab021

Czakon W. 2006. Łabędzie Poppera – Case studies w badaniach nauk o zarządzaniu. Przegląd Organizacji, 9: 9-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2006.09.03

David P.A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332-337.

Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.

DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Ellram L. 1996. The Use of Case Study Method in Logistics Research. Journal of Business Logistics, 17.

Essletzbichler J. 2015. Relatedness, Industrial Branching and Technological Cohesion in US Metropolitan Areas. Regional Studies, 49(5): 752-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.806793

Frenken K. 2017. A Complexity-Theoretic Perspective on Innovation Policy. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1, 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-41

Fuenfschilling L., Binz C. 2018. Global socio-technical regimes. Research Policy, 47(4): 735-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003

Ghezzi S., Mingione E. 2007. Embeddedness, Path Dependency and Social Institutions: An Economic Sociology Approach. Current Sociology, 55(1): 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107070131

Goldstein J.E., Neimark B., Garvey B., Phelps J. 2023. Unlocking “lock-in” and path dependency: A review across disciplines and socio-environmental contexts. World Development, 161, 106116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106116

Grillitsch M. 2019. Following or breaking regional development paths: On the role and capability of the innovative entrepreneur. Regional Studies, 53, 5: 681-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1463436

Hadler M. 2015. Institutionalism and Neo-institutionalism: History of the Concepts. [In:] International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, p. 186-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03187-1

Haider L.J., Boonstra W.J., Peterson G.D., Schlüter M. 2018. Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Review. World Development, 101: 311-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.038

Hassink R., Isaksen A., Trippl M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11): 1636-1645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704

Hernandez L., Atienza M., Modrego F. 2022. Is industrial related variety an enabling condition for regional entrepreneurship? A comparison between mining and non-mining regions in Chile. Extractive Industries and Society, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101096

Isaksen A., Jakobsen S., Njos R., Normann R. 2019. Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1): 48-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322

Isaksen A., Trippl M. 2014. Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Papers in Innovation Studies, Article 17 (https://ideas.repec.org//p/hhs/lucirc/2014_017.html).

Jackson J.E., Klich J., Poznanska K. 2005. The Political Economy of Poland’s Transition: New Firms and Reform Governments. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510182

Jarzabkowski P. 2004. Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use. Organization Studies, 25(4): 529-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040675

Jarzabkowski P., Balogun J., Seidl D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1): 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075703

Jarzabkowski P., Kavas M., Krull E. 2021. It’s Practice. But is it Strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality. Organization Theory, 2(3): 26317877211029664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211029665

Jarzabkowski P., Spee A.P. 2009. Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1): 69-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x

Jarzabkowski P., Seidl D., Balogun J. 2022. From germination to propagation: Two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions. Human Relations, 75(8): 1533-1559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221089473

Johnson G., Melin L., Whittington R. 2003. Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity-Based View. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1): 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00002

Kearney A., Harrington D., Kelliher F. 2019. Strategizing in the micro firm: A ‘strategy as practice’ framework. Industry and Higher Education, 33(1): 6-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218816232

MacKinnon D., Dawley S., Pike A., Cumbers A. 2019. Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach. Economic Geography, 95(2): 113-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294

Martin R., Sunley P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 395-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012

Meyer J.W., Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Moore N. (Ed.) (2006). Desk research. [In:] How to Do Research: The Practical Guide to Designing and Managing Research Projects, p. 106-111.

Myck M., Oczkowska M. 2018. Shocked by Therapy? Unemployment in the First Years of the Socio-Economic Transition in Poland and its Long-Term Consequences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3129286

O’Hare P. 2018. Resisting the “Long-Arm” of the State? Spheres of Capture and Opportunities for Autonomy in Community Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(2): 210-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12606

Pierson P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011

Rainnie A. 2021. Regional development and agency: Unfinished business. Local Economy, 36, 1: 42-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942211023877

Selznick P. 1996. Institutionalism “Old” and “New.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2): 270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393719

Sorenson O. 2017. Regional ecologies of entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 17, 5: 959-974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx031

Suddaby R., Seidl D., Lê J.K. 2013. Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11(3): 329-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013497618

Taylor Z. 2019. Pathways to legitimacy. Planning Theory, 18(2): 214-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218806929

Trippl M., Grillitsch M., Isaksen A. 2018. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5): 687-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982

Uyarra E., Flanagan K. 2022. Going beyond the line of sight: Institutional entrepreneurship and system agency in regional path creation. Regional Studies, 56, 4: 536-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1980522

Whittington R. 2003. The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective. Strategic Organization, 1(1): 117-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147612700311006

Xiao J., Boschma R., Andersson M. 2018. Industrial Diversification in Europe: The Differentiated Role of Relatedness. Economic Geography, 94(5): 514-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989

Yamoah F.A., Johnson C. 2020. Minding the Gaps in British Ethnic Entrepreneurship and Commercial History: From the Genesis to the 21st Century. Journal of Historical Sociology, 33(4): 614-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12296

Yin R.K. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sixth ed. Sage.