Keywords
local elections
rural municipalities
multi-term office holding
Polish self-government
How to Cite
Abstract
The paper analyses the term limit that the 2018 amendment introduced to the Electoral Code. By limiting the number of terms to two, it is one of the critical institutional changes facing local government in Poland today. The consequences of this change remain uncertain and may impact future local government structures. One essential question is how such a significant institutional amendment affects local governments’ performance. Another paramount issue concerns how local leaders’ acceptance or lack thereof affects its implementation. The paper problematises the opinions of commune chairpersons on their role within the local government structure, their perceptions of term limits for executive bodies, and their assessments of the changes taking place in the Polish local government system, hypothesising that the socio-economic development of municipalities and the experience of rural commune heads shape their perceptions of changes in local government, including attitudes toward term limits. The research materials come from a survey conducted in 2021 among members of 133 rural municipalities in the Łódź voivodeship, located in central Poland, supplemented by in-depth questionnaire interviews conducted in 2022 among the rural municipality mayors of ten diverse municipalities in this region. The research revealed divided opinions among decision-makers regarding the reported change, depending on their length of term of office and the socio-economic situation of the municipality. In the opinion of the leaders surveyed, the municipality’s socio-economic status is more important than formal regulations on term limits.
References
Ayres S. 2018. Regional governance and democracy. [In:] A. Paasi, J. Harrison, M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories. Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 219-230.
Brender A. 2003. The effect of fiscal performance on local government election results in Israel: 1989-1998. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9-10): 2187-2205
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. Opinie na temat ograniczenia liczby kadencji władz w samorządach. 2017. Komunikat z Badań, 25.
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. Zaufanie społeczne. 2024. Komunikat z Badań, 40.
Gendźwiłł A., Swianiewicz P. 2017. Breeding grounds for local independents, bonus for incumbents: Directly elected mayors in Poland. [In:] D. Sweeting (Ed.), Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance. Policy Press, p. 184-202.
Guinjoan M., Rodon T. 2021. Let’s party! The impact of local festivities on the incumbent’s electoral support. Local Government Studies, 47(5): 712-734
Guzman J.L. 2016. The Impact of Capital Expenditure on the Probability of Reelection of Mayors at the District Level in Peru. Journal of Economics Library, 3(1): 111-140.
Hambleton R., Sweeting D. 2015. The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol.
Han H., Ko K., Cho S.Y. 2019. Does the longer tenure of local government heads affect the performance of local governments? The Korean case. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1): 127-144.
Katsimi M., Sarantides V. (2015). Public investment and reelection prospects in developed countries. Southern Economic Journal, 82(2): 471-500
Kowalik J. 2015. Demokracja lokalna a idea ograniczenia liczby kadencji wójtów (burmistrzów, prezydentów miast) [Local democracy and the idea of term limits voits (mayors)]. Political Preferences, 10: 159-176.
Kuhlmann R., Lewis D.C. 2017. Legislative Term Limits and Voter Turnout. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 17(4): 372-392
Levitt S.D., Snyder J.M. 1997. The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1): 30-53
Nalder K. 2007. The Effect of State Legislative Term Limits on Voter Turnout. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(2): 187-210.
Pollitt C. 2005. Decentralization. [In:] F. Ewan, L.E. Lynn Jr., C. Pollitt (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford University Press, p. 371-397.
Poselski projekt ustawy o zmianie niektórych ustaw w celu zwiększenia udziału obywateli w procesie wybierania, funkcjonowania i kontrolowania niektórych organów publicznych. Druk nr 2001 w Sejmie VIII kadencji, Warszawa, 10 listopada 2017 r.
Report CG36. 2019. 13 – Local and regional democracy in Poland.
Składowski K. 2019. Ograniczenie w liczbie kadencji w wyborach prezydentów, burmistrzów i wójtów [Term Limits for Mayors and Commune Chairpersons]. Finanse Komunalne, 2: 5-15.
Smart M., Sturm D.M. 2013. Term limits and electoral accountability. Journal of Public Economics, 107: 93-102
Stasiak E. 2024. The tenure of the local executive tenures on the example of local government elections in the Łódź voivodeship. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 88: 4560
Sweeting D. 2017. Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance. Policy Press.
Ustawa z dnia 20 czerwca 2002 r. o bezpośrednim wyborze wójta, burmistrza i prezydenta miasta (Dz.U. z 2002 r. nr 113, poz. 984 ze zm.).
Ustawa z dnia 11 stycznia 2018 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw w celu zwiększenia udziału obywateli w procesie wybierania, funkcjonowania i kontrolowania niektórych organów publicznych (Dz.U. z 2018 r. poz. 130 ze zm.).
Veiga F.J., Veiga L.G. 2018. Term limits and voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 53: 20-28
Veiga L.G., Veiga F.J. 2016. Term limits at the local government level: Evidence from a natural experiment (No. NIPE* WP 07). University of Minho Working Papers.
Venice Commission. 2019. Report on Term-limits (No. CDL-AD(2019)007). Council of Europe: European Commission for Democracy through Law; 17.05.2025 (https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282019%29007-e).
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ewelina Stasiak, Mariusz E. Sokołowicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.