Land use decision modeling with opportunity costs
Journal cover , volume 19, no. 79, year 2026, title Regional Development and Regional Policy
PDF

Keywords

opportunity costs
land management
decision-making modelling
social costs
environmental costs

How to Cite

Badura, P. (2026). Land use decision modeling with opportunity costs. Rozwój Regionalny I Polityka Regionalna, 19(79), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2026.79.09

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a model approach to the land development decision-making process that formally incorporates opportunity costs. Drawing on the experiences of municipalities in the Silesian Voivodeship regarding the analysis of post-industrial land development, the study used content analysis of project documents and the BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) notation to develop an innovative decision process model. The research identified key required stages, including socio-economic analysis, social participation, financial efficiency analysis, and comprehensive economic and environmental analyses that quantify both costs and benefits. Crucially, the model mandates a systematic analysis of alternative options and introduces a formal decision gateway based on the acceptable level of quantified opportunity costs, including their often-neglected social and ecological dimensions. This framework offers a practical tool for decision-makers at the local government level, enabling a more holistic, sustainable, and economically optimal approach to land use planning by directly addressing the trade-offs inherent in resource allocation.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2026.79.09
PDF

References

Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., Laibson D. 2016. Macroeconomics (Global Edition). Pearson, p. 36-38.

Adler P.A., Adler P. 2012. How many qualitative interviews is enough? [In:] S.E. Baker, R. Edwards (eds.), How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton, p. 8-11.

Appelt K. 2018. Aequalitas Valorisin Menger’s Theory of the Commodity Exchange. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H, Oeconomia, 52(1): 9-12.

Belton V., Stewart T.J. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Boardman A.E., Greenberg D.H., Vining A.R., Weimer D.L. 2001. Cost-benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Prentice Hall, p. 29.

Buchanan J.M. 1999. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan: An Inquiry in Economic Theory. Liberty Fund.

Cannon C., Goldsmith K., Roux C. 2019. A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1): 104-127.

Charmaz K. 2009. Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, p. 60-79.

Ciszewski T., Nowakowski W. 2017. Analysis of the cost of existence using the example of a railway crossing security system. TTS Technika Transportu Szynowego, 24(12): 149-154.

Colander D. 2014. Economics. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Creswell J.W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, p. 12.

Czakon W., Glinka B. 2021. Foundations of Qualitative Research. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, p. 57-62.

Drobniak A. 2001. Evaluation of public projects with cost-benefit analysis. Gospodarka Narodowa, 172(11-12): 52-68.

Domanowska M. 2010. Problematyka definiowania przestrzeni zdegradowanych. Problemy Rozwoju Miast, 2: 81-87.

Domański B. 2000. Restrukturyzacja terenów poprzemysłowych w miastach. [In:] Z. Ziobrowski et al. (eds.), Odnowa miast. Rewitalizacja, rehabilitacja, restrukturyzacja. Instytut Gospodarki Przestrzennej i Komunalnej, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, p. 107-140.

Frank R.H., Bernanke B.S. 2012. Principles of Economics. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Freeman A.M. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. 2nd ed. Resources for the Future.

Gasidło K. 1998. Problemy przekształceń terenów poprzemysłowych. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.

Guest G., Bunce A., Johnson L. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1): 59-82.

Haghpour B., Donnelly G.E., Bettman J.R., Luce M.F. 2022. Opportunity cost in consumer behavior: Definitions, operationalizations, and ambiguities. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5): 1942-1959.

Hubbard R.G., O’Brien A.P. 2012. Economics. 4th ed. Pearson Education.

Janik M. 2014. The Austrian School of Economics and its representatives. Roczniki Ekonomii i Zarządzania, 6(2): 43-75.

Krugman P., Wells R. 2020. Microeconomics. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, p. 414-415.

Księżyk M. 2012. Ekonomia: podejście historyczne i prospektywne. Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne – Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, p. 57-60, 95-99.

Ligus M. 2010. Social costs and benefits in assessing the economic efficiency of energy management at the local level. [In:] Efficiency – considerations on essence and measurement. Scientific Papers of the University of Economics in Wrocław, 144: 268-288.

Malczewski J. 1999. GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Mankiw G., Taylor M. 2021. Microeconomics. 2nd ed. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, p. 342-353.

Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11.

McConnell C.R., Brue S.L., Flynn S.M. 2012. Economics. 19th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Menger C. 2013. Principles of Economics. Fijorr Publishing Company, p. 113-141.

Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future.

Musiał G. 2010. Foundations of Microeconomic Science. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, p. 43.

Pancewicz A. 2012. Przyrodnicza rewitalizacja terenów poprzemysłowych. Architektura – Czasopismo Techniczne, 12: 313-317.

Parkin M. 2016. Opportunity cost: A reexamination. The Journal of Economic Education, 47(1): 12-22.

Polak P. 2019. Use of BPMN diagrams to describe relations between citizens and public administration institutions. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej, 33: 201-213.

Rizun M. 2021. Knowledge modelling for shaping an individual study profile. Thesis.

Samuelson P., Nordhaus W. 2012. Economics. Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, p. 782-804.

Shi X., Li F., Chumnumpan P. 2020. The use of product scarcity in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 380-418.

Słodczyk J. 2003. Przestrzeń miasta i jej przeobrażenia. Studia i Monografie Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.

Sun H., Teichert T. 2024. Scarcity in today’s consumer markets: Scoping the research landscape by author keywords. Management Review Quarterly, 74: 93-120.

Żytniewski M., Zadora M. 2013. Business process modelling using BPMN notation. Studia Ekonomiczne/Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 128: 195-210.