Status związku (w związku intymnym vs singiel), konstrukt Ja i zdrowie psychiczne młodzieży akademickiej
PDF

Słowa kluczowe

independent self-construal
interdependent self-construal
mental health
single
partnered
university students

Jak cytować

Adamczyk, . K., Jankowiak, . B., & Soroko, . E. (2017). Status związku (w związku intymnym vs singiel), konstrukt Ja i zdrowie psychiczne młodzieży akademickiej. Studia Edukacyjne, (45), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2017.45.5

Abstrakt

The aim of this online survey was to test the hypothesis that self-construals (Independent self-construal and Interdependent self-construal) mediate the association between relationship status (single vs. partnered) and mental health. Four hundred and twenty-nine university students (327 females and 102 males) 19-25 (M = 21.79, SD = 1.72) completed the Polish versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 and Self-Construal Scale. The results indicated that although different configurtions of self-construals are related to the level of experienced anxiety, the aspects of mental health analyzed are not related to the interaction between relationship status (partnered vs single) and 4 configurationsof self-construals. At the same time, the revealed lack of correlation between relationship status and mental health is contradictory to expectations and hypotheses. The results suggest that university students are perhaps in the middle of a prolonged moratorium, and in consequence, not making an attempt to fulfilldevelopmental tasks characteristic for (young) adults cannot be seen as an indicator of any aspect of psychological health.

https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2017.45.5
PDF

Bibliografia

Albano A.M., Krain A., Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders in Girls, [w:] Handbook of behavioral and emotional problems in girls, red. D.J. Bell, S.L. Foster, E.J. Mash, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 2005.

Bell D.J., Foster S.L., Mash E.J., Understanding Behavioral and Emotional Problems in Girls, [w:] Handbook of behavioral and emotional problems in girls, red. D.J. Bell, S.L. Foster, E.J. Mash, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 2005.

Bonino S., Cattelino E., Ciairano S., Adolescents and Risk. Behavior, Functions, and Protective Factors, Springer-Verlag, Italia 2005.

Braithwaite S.R., Delevi R., Fincham F.D., Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students, Personal Relationships, 2010, 17(1).

Cross S.E., Bacon P.L., Morris M.L., The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78.

Cross S.E., Madson L., Models of the self: self-construals and gender, Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 122(1).

Cross S.E., Morris M.L., Gore J.S., Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82.

DePaulo B., Morris W., Singles in society and science, Psychological Inquiry, 2005, 2-3.

Erikson E.H., Dzieciństwo i społeczeństwo, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań 1997.

Erikson E.H., Identity and the life cycle, W.W. Norton & Company, New York 1980.

Erikson E.H., Dopełniony cykl życia, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań 2002.

Frąckowiak-Sochańska M., Zdrowie psychiczne kobiet i mężczyzn. Płeć społeczno-kulturowa a kategorie „zdrowia psychicznego” i „chorób psychicznych”, Nowiny Lekarskie, 2011, 80, 5.

Goldberg D., Williams P., A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire, NFER NELSON Publishing Company Ltd., Windsor 1988.

Goldberg D., Williams P., Makowska Z., Merecz D., Ocena zdrowia psychicznego na podstawie badań kwestionariuszami Davida Goldberga. Podręcznik dla użytkowników kwestionariuszy GHQ-12 i GHQ-28, Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. Prof. J. Nofera, Łódź 2001.

Goldberg D.P., Hillier V.F., A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire, Psychological Medicine, 1979, 9(1).

Jankowiak B., Behawioralne i emocjonalne problemy dziewcząt i kobiet. Dlaczego nie wiemy więcej? [w:] Kontrowersje wokół socjalizacji dziewcząt i kobiet, red. A. Matysiak-Błaszczyk,B. Jankowiak, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2016.

Kamp Dush C.M., Amato P.R., Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2005, 22(5).

Kleka P., Dane z kwestionariuszy jako wartościowe źródło informacji o osobach badanych, [w:] Diagnozowanie – wyzwania i konteksty, red. J.W. Paluchowski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2017.

Lehmann V., Tuinman M.A., Braeken J., Vingerhoets A.J.J.M., Sanderman R., Hagedoorn M., Satisfaction with Relationship Status: Development of a New Scale and the Role in Predicting Well-Being, Journal of Happiness Studies, 2015, 16.

Lewinson D.J., A Conception of Adult Development, American Psychologist, 1986, 41, 1.

Markus H., Kitayama S., Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation, Psychological Review, 1991, 98.

Newman B.M., Newman P.R., Development through life: a psychosocial approach, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, California 1987.

Pilarska A., Polska adaptacja Skali Konstruktów Ja, Studia Psychologiczne, 2011, 49(1).

Piotrowski K., Wojciechowska J., Ziółkowska B., Rozwój nastolatka. Późna faza dorastania, [w:] Niezbędnik dobrego nauczyciela, red. A.I. Brzezińska, Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych, Warszawa 2014.

Prabhakar B., Causes for remaining single: A comparative study, Journal of Psychosocial Research, 2011, 6.

Resnick M., Protective Factors, Resilience, and Health Youth Development, Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 2000, 11(1).

Singelis T.M., The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, 20(5).

Such-Pyrgiel M., The lifestyles of single people in Poland, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 109.

Umberson D., Williams K., Family status and mental health, [w:] Handbook of the sociology of mental health, red. C.S. Aneshensel, J.C. Phelan, Kluwer/Plenum, New York 1999.