Abstract
Background: In the contemporary culture we observed a kind of apology for the hybridization of cognitive activity. Nevertheless, we don’t know is it a real phenomenon or only a facade. To shed some new light on this issue, we investigated two qualitative studies on the hybridization of spontaneous cognitive activity.
Methods: Three martial arts masters and four triathletes took part in these studies. A structured interview was used to collect data.
Results: We found that professional and experienced athletes do not recognize a big potential for hybridization. They can’t imagine a strong hybridization of own, and their students, spontaneous cognitive activity, both in the current and the future technological reality.
Conclusions: This study contradicts the idea of the superiority (in the cognitive contexts) of what online, over what offline.
References
Bauman Z., Liquid life, Polity, Cambridge-Malden 2005.
de Kerckhove D., The architecture of intelligence, Birkhauser, Basel – Boston – Berlin 2001.
del Rio P., Some effects of media on representation: A line of research, [w:] Psychology of media in Europe. The state of the art – perspectives for the future, Ed. P. Winterhoff-Spurk, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1995.
Du Y., Prashad S., Schoenbrun I., Clark J.E., Probabilistic motor sequence yields greater offline and less online learning than fixed sequence, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016, 10.
Ferneding K., Understanding the message of the medium: Media technologies as an aesthetic, [w:] International handbook of research in arts education, red. L. Bresler, Springer, Dordrecht 2007.
Gabay Y., Schiff R., Vakil E., Dissociation between online and offline learning in developmental dyslexia, Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 2012, 34(3).
Herczeg M., The smart, the intelligent and the wise: roles and values of interactive technologies, „Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Technologies and Multimedia”, ACM 2010.
Hewson C., Can online course-based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2012, 28(5).
Klichowski M., Hiperstrukturalne uczestnictwo – postmodernistyczny wymiar Ŝycia młodzieŜy, [w:] Wymiary społecznego uczestnictwa w Ŝyciu. Między dzieciństwem a dorosłością, red. H. Krauze-Sikorska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2011.
Klichowski M., Rozwój zainteresowań uczniów a Płynna Nowoczesność Zygmunta Baumana, Studia Edukacyjne, 2011, 15.
Klichowski M. Czy nadchodzi śmierć tekstu? Kilka refleksji na marginesie teorii technologicznego determinizmu, Studia Edukacyjne, 2012, 23.
Klichowski M., Między linearnością a klikaniem. O społecznych konstrukcjach podejść do uczenia się, Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Kraków 2012.
Klichowski M., Sens predykcji w pedagogice zainteresowań, [w:] Świat małego dziecka, t. II, red. H. Krauze-Sikorska, M. Klichowski, K. Kuszak, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2013.
Koo H.J., Woo S., Yang E., Kwon J.H., The double meaning of online social space: Three-way interactions among social anxiety, online social behavior, and offline social behavior, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015, 18(9).
Krauze-Sikorska H., Klichowski M., Świat Digital Natives. MłodzieŜ w poszukiwaniu siebie i innych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2013.
Little S., Holmes L., Grieco M., Calling up culture: Information spaces and information flows as the virtual dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, Information Technology & People, 2001, 14(4).
Melosik Z., Kultura popularna i toŜsamość młodzieŜy. W niewoli władzy i wolności, Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Kraków 2013.
Storkel H.L., Bontempo D.E., Pak N.S., Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: Effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2014, 57(5).
Trilling D., Schoenbach K., Investigating people’s news diets: How online users use offline news, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 2015, 40(1).
Trepte S., Dielin T., Reinecke L., Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study, Media Psychology, 2015, 18(1).
Trub L., A portrait of the self in the digital age: attachment, splitting, and self-concealment in online and offline self-presentation, Psychoanalytic Psychology Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation, 2016.
Turkle S., Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of the Freudian century, Sociological Inquiry, 1997, 67(1).
Turkle S., Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self, [w:] Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies, red. J.E. Katz, MIT Press, Cambridge 2008.
Turkle S., Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other, Basic Books, New York 2012.
Voorveld H.A.M., Smit E.G., Neijens P.C., Bronner A.E.F., Consumers’ cross-channel use in online and offline purchases. An analysis of cross-media and cross-channel behaviors between products, Journal of Advertising Research, 2016, 56(4).
Wang E.S.-T., Wang M.C.-H., Social support and social interaction ties on internet addiction: Integrating online and offline contexts, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2013, 16(11).
Welsch W., Sztuczne raje? RozwaŜania o świecie mediów elektronicznych i o innych światach, [w:] Nowe media w komunikacji społecznej w XX wieku, red. M. Hopfinger, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2002.