Reprivatisation and Structural Changes in the Agriculture of Post-Socialist Countries
PDF

Keywords

reprivatisation
property
land use
post-socialist countries

How to Cite

Sadowski, A. (2011). Reprivatisation and Structural Changes in the Agriculture of Post-Socialist Countries. Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, 133–154. Retrieved from https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sho/article/view/29254

Number of views: 112


Number of downloads: 65

Google Scholar Citation

WszystkieOd 2020
Cytowania195888916
h-indeks5936
i10-indeks456212
0
2000
1000
500
1500
199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025565160671051121621852272613713663023923664284035586436638589041278123314491817166619811801129

Abstract

Examples of post-socialist countries show that in a short time the private ownership rights could be recreated. But it does not mean creation of effective agricultural structures. In general the privatization action was based on the liquidation of the states possession and states farms and defining the rules of functioning of the private possession. Destructuralisation action were usually provided without planned strategy changes and without discernment possible consequences. Assumptions, which were established in the initial period of ownership transformation, which tended towards creating powerful economic units in agriculture were not executed at the full. The reprivatisation activities brought to the significant distribution of structures and creating dual arable structure. On the one hand, the group of powerful economic units was established. On the other hand, the large group of croft farms were created and in the near future a lot of them will be probably liquidated.

PDF