Redefining the image of the contemporary city – changes in linguistic and cultural realms – preliminary remarks

Main Article Content

Marta Koszko

Abstrakt

Contemporary cosmopolitan European cities have been recently undergoing considerable social changes. Although most of them can be described as multicultural, the character of their public space should be redefined due to the intensified influx of immigrants mainly from the Middle East and North Africa and the socio-cultural background they bring along. This social and cultural process has a significant influence on the internal and external image and the identity of the city. These notions can be discussed in reference to Meffert’s (1989) concept of the city’s identity and the image of a city, hence in reference to the system of visual identification, communication system and the city culture. A particular attention should be drawn to the language in the public space (linguistic landscape LL), ritualized public space and the overall image of the city. These naturally have to be considered in the context of the socio-cultural transformation of the European cities. It should also be pointed out that Meffert’s theory may need to be slightly redefined in order to reflect the present-day urban cultural and linguistic reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Koszko, M. (2019). Redefining the image of the contemporary city – changes in linguistic and cultural realms – preliminary remarks. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, (18), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2018.18.04
Dział
IMAGO MUNDI
Biogram autora

Marta Koszko, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

doktor nauk humanistycznych, anglistka, językoznawca, adiunkt w Zakładzie Ekolingwistyki i Komunikologii, Instytut Filologii Rosyjskiej i Ukraińskiej, Wydział Neofilologii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

  1. Ben-Rafael, E. Shohamy, E., Amara, M.H. and N. Trumper-Hecht. 2006. “Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: the case of Israel”. International Journal of Multilingualism 3.1. 7-30.
  2. Binyi, L. and F.M. Mwanza. 2014. “Social integration in public spaces and landscapes: perceptions and experiences towards multicultural Shanghai”. Chinese Studies 3.1.12-18. Published online February 2014 in SciRes.
  3. Connor, P. 2016. “Asylum report final”. Pew Research Center Europe. Washington, D.C.: August. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/08/14100940/Pew-Research-Center-Europe-Asylum-Report-FINAL-August-2-2016.pdf
  4. Grześkowiak, M. 2010. Trans-city or Inter-city? The co-existence of majority and minority languages in the urban space: a comparative case study of London and Warsaw linguistic landscapes. Poznań: Katedra Ekokomunikacji UAM.
  5. Görter, D. (ed.) 2006. Linguistic landscape. A new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  6. Kowalewska, K. 2018. “Wizerunek starości i osób starszych wśród uczniów na poziomie szkoły podstawowej”. Studium Vilnense A 15. 146-151.
  7. Kowalewska, K. and J. Puppel. 2017. “Wizerunek i wskaźnikowość układów ciała w reklamie prasowej – uwagi i badanie wstępne”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia. XVII. 495-502.
  8. Landry, R. and R.Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: an empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16.1. 23-49.
  9. Meffert, H. 1989. “Städtemarketing – Pflicht oder Kür?”. Planung und Analyse 8. 277.
  10. Mosterin, J. 2005. “A world without national states”. Acta Inst.Philos.Aesthet. 23. 55-77.
  11. Sevincer, A.T., Kitayama, S. and M.E.W. Varnum. 2015. “Cosmopolitan cities: the frontier in the twenty-first century?”. Front. Psychol. 6:1459. doi: 10.3389/f.psyg.2015.01459.
  12. Muench, W. 1991. “Die Stadt und die dynamik der kulturellen erneuerung [The city and the dynamics of cultural reformation],” In: Gephard, W. and H.P. Schreiner (eds.). Stadt und Kultur [City and Culture]. Duesseldorf: Leske und Buderich. 59-82.
  13. Puppel, S. 2016. “Kuźnia Hefajstosa czyli krótki zarys teorii wizerunku w komunikacji człowieka”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia XVI. 109-124.
  14. Puppel, J. and M. Koszko. 2017. “Wizerunek cmentarza – w wymiarze języka, kultury, dziedzictwa – uwagi wstępne na przykładzie cmentarza Mennonitów w Stogach Malborskich”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia XVII. 513-522.
  15. Rothenbuhler, E.W. 2003. Ritual communication: from everyday conversation to mediated ceremony. Thousand Oaks [etc.]: Sage Publications.
  16. Rurański, M. and J. Niemczyk. 2013. “Współczesne instrumenty kształtowania wizerunku miasta na przykładzie Wrocławia”. Studia Miejskie 11. 67-78.
  17. Stanowicka-Traczyk, A. 2008. Kształtowanie wizerunku miasta na przykładzie miast polskich. Bydgoszcz/Olsztyn: Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta.
  18. Sandercock, L. 2011. “Towards a cosmopolitan urbanism: from theory to practice”. Dialogues in Urban and Regional Planning 4. 38-57.