“I then for the first time felt fearful she might not rally…”: a discourse analysis of the nineteenth century case reports in ophthalmology

Main Article Content

Magdalena Zabielska

Abstrakt

The present paper constitutes a qualitative discursive investigation of the nineteenth century case reports from ophthalmology derived from a specialist American medical journal, and focuses on citation as well as on authorial and patient’s presence. Regarding the first aspect, the present study generally confirms the results of the previous research, i.e. significant subjectivity, directness and informal character of the texts at hand. However, it also provides another insight into the scholarly communication in the nineteenth century, focusing on how patients are positioned therein, which has not received significant attention in the literature of the subject. Additionally, the paper offers an overview of the studies on specific aspects of scientific prose of the nineteenth century, including the medical context, as well as attempts to show the relation between the texts analysed and the context of their production and functioning, following the tradition of Genre Rhetorical Studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Zabielska, M. (2019). “I then for the first time felt fearful she might not rally…”: a discourse analysis of the nineteenth century case reports in ophthalmology. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, (18), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2018.18.21
Dział
Językoznawstwo
Biogram autora

Magdalena Zabielska, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

doktor nauk humanistycznych, anglistka, językoznawca, adiunkt w Zakładzie Socjolingwistyki i Studiów nad Dyskursem, Wydział Anglistyki, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

  1. Ädel, A. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  2. Artemeva, N. and A. Freedman. 2008. “Introduction”. In: Artemeva, N. and A. Freedman (eds.). Rhetorical genre studies and beyond. Winnipeg: Inkshed Publications. 143–188.
  3. Atkinson, D. 1996. “The “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1675–1975: a sociohistorical discourse analysis”. Language in Society 25 (3). 333–371.
  4. Atkinson, D. 2001. “Scientific discourse across history: a combined multi- dimensional/rhetorical analysis of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London”. In: Biber, D., Conrad, S. and R. Reppen (eds.). Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge
  5. University Press. 45–65.
  6. Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping written knowledge. The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  7. Berkenkotter, C. 2009. “A case for historical “wide-angle” genre analysis: a personal retrospective”. IBÉRICA 18. 9–22.
  8. Berkenkotter, C. and T. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: cognition/culture/ power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Blois, M.S. 1984. Information and medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  11. Carciu, O.M. 2009. “An intercultural study of first-person plural references in biomedical writing”. IBÉRICA 18. 71–92.
  12. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  13. Fairclough, N. and R. Wodak. 1997. “Critical discourse analysis”. In: van Dijk, T.A. (ed.). Discourse as social interaction. Vol. 1. London: Sage Publications. 258–284.
  14. Fleischman, S. 2001. “Language and medicine”. In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and H.E. Hamilton (eds.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 470–502.
  15. Foucault, M. 1969/2002. The archeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
  16. Fowler, R. 1996. Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
  17. French, R. 2003. Medicine before science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Gee, J.P. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. New York: Routledge.
  19. Geertz, C. 1988. Words and lives: the anthropologist as author. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  20. Grice, F. and A. Kramer-Dahl. 1992. “Grammaticalising the medical case history”. In: Toolan, M. (ed.). Language, text and context: essays in stylistics. London: Routledge. 56–90.
  21. Gunnarsson, B.-L. 2001. “Expressing criticism and evaluation during three centuries”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (1). 115–139.
  22. Gunnarsson, B.-L. 2009. Professional discourse. London: Continuum.
  23. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.
  24. Helán, R. 2012. Analysis of published medical case reports: Genre-based study. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Brno: Masaryk University.
  25. Hurwitz, B. 2006. “Form and representation in clinical case reports”. Literature and Medicine 25 (2). 216–240.
  26. Hyland, K. 1997. “Scientific claims and community values: articulating an academic culture”. Language and Communication 17. 19–31.
  27. Hyland, K. 2002. “Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing”. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8). 1091–1112.
  28. Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
  29. Kuo, C.-H. 1998. “The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles”. English for Specific Purposes 18. 121–138.
  30. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  31. Lores, R. 2004. “On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization”. English for Specific Purposes 23. 280–302.
  32. Lores-Sanz, R. 2011. “The construction of the author’s voice in academic writing: the interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors”. Text and Talk 31 (2). 173–193.
  33. Margotta, R. 1996. History of medicine. London: Hamlyn.
  34. Murawska (Zabielska), M. 2010. “Figures, grounds and containers. Patient presentation in medical case reports”. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 41. 77–91.
  35. Murawska (Zabielska), M. 2013. “Personal and sensational vs. impersonal and objective – a historical overview of patient presentation in medical case reports”. Tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs 6. 185–202.
  36. Myers, G. 1989. “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles”. Applied Linguistics 10. 1–35.
  37. Nowell-Smith, H. 1995. “Nineteenth-century narrative case histories: an inquiry into stylistics and history”. CBMH/BCHM 12. 47–67.
  38. O’Halloran, K. 2003. Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  39. Ramos, M.J.E. 2006. “Medical terminology across the centuries: distinctive features of a chronological study in the field of ophthalmology”. IBÉRICA 12. 111–126.
  40. Ramos, M.J.E. 2008. English medical vocabulary in ophthalmology. Muenchen: Lincom.
  41. Rylance, R. 2006. “The theatre and the granary: observations on nineteenth-century medical narratives”. Literature and Medicine 25 (2). 255–278.
  42. Sacks, O. 1986. The man who mistook his wife for a hat: and other clinical tales. London: Picador.
  43. Salager-Meyer, F. 1999. “Referential behaviour in scientific writing: a diachronic study (1810–1995)”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (3). 279–305.
  44. Salager-Meyer, F. and N. Zambrano. 2001. “The bittersweet rhetoric of controversiality in nineteenthand twentieth-century French and English medical literature”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (1). 141–173.
  45. Salager-Meyer, F. and M.A. Alcaraz Ariza. 2013. “The medical narrative from a diachronic perspective (1840–2009): titling practices and authorship”. In: Gotti, M. and C. Sancha (eds.). Narratives in academic and professional genres. Bern: Peter Lang. 293–318.
  46. Sheldon, E. 2009. “From one I to another: discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles”. English for Specific Purposes 28. 251–265.
  47. Skelton, J. 1997. “How to tell the truth in the British Medical Journal: patterns of judgement in the 19th and 20th centuries”. In: Markkanen, R. and H. Schröder (eds.). Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 42–63.
  48. Sournia, J.C. 1994. “Les phases évolutives du vocabulaire médical français”. Meta 29 (4). 692–700.
  49. Taavitsainen, I. and P. Pahta. 2000. “Conventions of professional writing: the medical case report in a historical perspective”. Journal of English Linguistics 28 (1). 60–76.
  50. Tang, R. and S. John. 1999. “The ‘I’ in identity: exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun”. English for Specific Purposes 18. S23–S39.
  51. Valle, E. 1997. “A scientific community and its texts: a historical discourse study”. In: Gunnarsson, B.-L., Linell, P. and B. Nordberg (eds.). The construction of professional discourse. Edinburgh: Pearson Longman. 76–98.
  52. Vassileva, I. 1998. “Who am I/who are we in academic writing?”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2). 163–190.
  53. Virchow, R. 1880. Post-mortem examinations, with especial reference to medico-legal practice. Translated by T. Smith. Philadelphia: Presley Blackiston.
  54. Zabielska, M. 2014. Searching for the patient’s presence in medical case reports. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  55. Zabielska, M. 2015. “Patient-centred case reporting: state of the art”. In: Zabielska, M., Wąsikiewicz-Firlej, E. and A. Szczepaniak-Kozak (eds.). Discourses in co(n)text: the many faces of specialised discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2–32.
  56. Primary sources:
  57. TO1 Hildreth, J.G. 1866. “Extract from observations upon anesthesia of the cornea and radiating fibres of the iris occurring without intra-ocular tension”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (3). 19–25.
  58. TO2 Noyes, H.D. 1868. “Observations in astigmatism”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 28–29.
  59. TO3 Pomeroy, O.D. “Case of acquired astigmatism”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 30.
  60. TO5 Simrock, F. 1870. “A case of cyst of iris”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1 (7). 64–66.
  61. TO6 Morton, W.R. 1868. “Case of encephaloid tumor springing from the fundus of the eye-ball stimulating glaucoma”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 39.
  62. TO7 Noyes, J.F. 1868. “Enucleation of eye for sympathetic ophthalmia”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 97–98.
  63. TO8 Dyer, E. 1866. “Fracture of the lens of one eye and of the anterior capsules of both eyes from death by violent hanging”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (3). 12–19.
  64. TO9 Jeffries, J. “Rough notes of a case of glio-sarcoma”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (7). 72–73.
  65. TO10 Jeffries, J.B. 1870. “Three cases of herpes zoster frontalis seu ophthalmicus”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (7). 72–73.
  66. TO11 Jeffries, J.B. 1868. “A case of herpes zoster ophthalmicus, in a patient nearly eighty years of age, causing fatal prostration”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 75–91.
  67. TO12 Allin, C.M. 1866. “Case of sudden monocular amaurosis”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (3). 10–12.
  68. TO13 Derby, H. 1868. “Mydriatics in glaucoma”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 35–38.
  69. TO15 Noyes, H.D. 1868. “Retinitis in glycosuria”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 71–75.
  70. TO17 Noyes, H.D. 1866. “Cases of sub-retinal effusion – puncture”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (3). 36–42.
  71. T18 Sands, H.B. 1866. “Sudden monocular amaurosis, presenting unusual difficulties in diagnosis”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (3). 2–10.
  72. TO20 Williams, H.W. 1868. “Suture of the wound of cornea after flap extraction – report of forty-four cases”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (4–5). 58–61.
  73. TO22 Roosa, J.D.B. Sr. 1869. “Vascular tumor of iris, probably sarcomatous, with colored plate”. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 1 (6). 14–15.