Developing communicative competence in L2 tertiary level students: remarks on culturally responsive teaching

Article Sidebar

PDF
Opublikowane: lut 7, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2018.18.23
Słowa kluczowe:
L2 teaching, L2 learning, academic communication, cultural values, identity

Main Article Content

Jerzy Zybert
Iga Lehman
Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Warszawie

Abstrakt

Semiotic links exist among communication, culture, teaching, and learning and this has important implications for implementing culturally responsive teaching. The present paper provides some arguments in favour of creating culturally sensitive classrooms where students have an opportunity to acquire a broader cultural awareness which helps them to develop their intercultural communicative competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Zybert, J., & Lehman, I. (2019). Developing communicative competence in L2 tertiary level students: remarks on culturally responsive teaching. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, (18), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2018.18.23
Numer
Nr 18 (2018)
Dział
Językoznawstwo
LICENCJA:
Licencja Creative Commons
Prace publikowane w czasopiśmie dostępne są na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Biogramy autorów

Jerzy Zybert

profesor zwyczajny, doktor habilitowany, anglista, językoznawca

Iga Lehman, Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Warszawie

doktor nauk humanistycznych, anglistka, językoznawca, dyrektor Instytutu Anglistyki, kierownik Katedry Dydaktyki
i Akwizycji Języka Angielskiego, Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych, Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Warszawie

Referencje

  1. Bruner, I. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Hall, E. 1956. The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  3. Hofstede, G.H. 1986. “Cultural differences in teaching and learning.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10. 301-319.
  4. Hofstede, G.H. 1980. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related value. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Pillay, V. 2006. “Culture. exploring the river”. In LeBaron, M. and V. Pillay (eds.). Conflict across cultures: a unique experience of bridging differences. Boston: Intercultural Press. 25-56.
  7. Porter, R.E. and L.A. Samovar. 1991. “Basic principles of intercultural communication”. In: Samovar, L.A.
  8. nd R.E. Porter. (eds.). Intercultural communication: a reader (6th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 5-22.
  9. Widdowson, H. 2004. „The ownership of English.” TESOL Quarterly 2. 377-389.
  10. Samovar, L.A. and R.E. Porter. 2004. Communication between cultures (4th edition). Boston: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  11. Vassileva, I. 2000. Who is the author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard.