The protection of natural language diversity – fancy or duty?

Main Article Content

Stanisław Puppel

Abstrakt

The protection of natural language diversity – fancy or duty?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Puppel, S. (2019). The protection of natural language diversity – fancy or duty?. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, (10), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp.2009.10.07
Dział
Językoznawstwo
Biogram autora

Stanisław Puppel, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

profesor zwyczajny, doktor habilitowany, anglista, językoznawca, kierownik Katedry Ekokomunikacji UAM, kierownik Pracowni Monitorowania i Profilowania Języków i Komunikacji

Bibliografia

  1. Arzoz, X. (ed.). 2008. Respecting linguistic diversity in the European Union. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  2. Bastardas-Boada, A. 2007. „Linguistic sustainability for a multilingual humanity”. The X Linguapax Congress on ‘Linguistic Diversity, Sustainability and Peace. Forum 2004, Barcelona.
  3. Bastock, M., D. Morris and M. Moynihan. 1953. „Some comments on conflict and thwarting in animals”. Behaviour 6. 66–84.
  4. Bekoff, M. and L.A. Dugatkin. 2000. „Winner and loser effects and the development of dominance relationships in young coyotes: an integration of data and theory”. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2. 871–883.
  5. Bernstein, I.S. 1981. “Dominance: the baby and the bathwater“. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4. 419–457.
  6. Bonabeau, E., G. Theraulaz and J.L. Deneubourg. 1999. „Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited”. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 61. 727–757.
  7. Breton, A. (ed.). 1999. New Canadian perspectives: exploring the economics of language. Ottawa: Canadian Heritage.
  8. Chałacińska-Wiertelak, H. and K. Kropaczewski (eds.). Dyskurs wielokulturowy. Łódź: Drukarnia i Wydawnictwo „PIKTOR”.
  9. Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  10. Cook, G. 2000. „Vanishing tongues”. Boston Globe. November 5, p. A01.
  11. Crystal, D. 2000. Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Dalby, A. 2002. Language in danger: how language loss threatens our future. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
  13. Drews, C. 1993. „The concept and definition of dominance behavior”. Behaviour 125. 284–313.
  14. Dugatkin, L.A. 1997. „Winner effects, loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies”. Behavioral Ecology 8.6. 583–587.
  15. Dugatkin, L.A. 1998. „A model of coalition formation in animals”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 265. 2121–2125.
  16. Eckert, T., A. Johann, A. Känzig, M. Küng, B. Müller, C. Schwald and L. Walder. “Is English a ‘killer language’? The globalisation of a code”. eHistLing Vol. 1. 106–118.
  17. Fishman, J.A. 2000. “English: the killer language? Or a passing phase?”. Whole Earth. Spring 2000.
  18. González Fernández, P. 2004. „Linguistic imperialism in the ELT profession?”. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1. 113–139.
  19. Grimes, B.F. (ed.). 2000. Ethnologue: languages of the world. 14th ed. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  20. Grin, F. 1999. „The notions of supply and demand in the economic analysis of language”. In Breton, A. (ed.). 31–61.
  21. Grin, F. 2003. „Language planning and economics”. Current Issues in Language Planning 4.1. 1–66.
  22. Gudykunst, W. 1988. Language and ethnic identity. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  23. Hale, K.L. 1992. „Language endangerment and the human value of linguistic diversity”. Language 68. 35–42.
  24. Harrison, K.D. 2007. When languages die. The extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Headland, T.N. 2003. „Thirty endangered languages in the Philippines”. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 47.
  26. Hemelrijk, C.K. 2002. „Self-organization and natural selection in the evolution of complex despotic societies”. Biological Bulletin 202. 283–288.
  27. Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper. 1983. “The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumblebee colonies: a mirror model“. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12. 271–283.
  28. Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper. 1985. “Socioinformatic processes: MIRROR modeling methodology”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 113. 311–330.
  29. Johnstone, R.A. and L.A. Dugatkin. 2000. „Coalition formation in animals and the nature of winner and loser effects”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267. 17–21.
  30. Kazem, A.J.N. and F. Aureli. 2005. „Redirection of aggression: multiparty signalling within a network?”. In McGregor, P.K. (ed.). 191–218.
  31. Klaus, H. 1998. American bilingual tradition. 2nd ed. McHenry, Ill.: Delta Systems.
  32. Kouritzin, S.G. 1999. Face(t)s of first language loss. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. Krashen, S.D., L. Tse and J. McQuillan. (eds.). 1998. Heritage language development. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
  34. Landau, H.G. 1951. “On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors”. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 13. 245–262.
  35. Matsumura, S. 2007. „The evolution of ‘egalitarian’ and ‘despotic’ social systems among macaques”. Biomedical and Life Sciences 40.1. 23–31.
  36. Maynard Smith, J. and G. Parker. 1976. „The logic of asymmetric contests”. Animal Behaviour 24. 159–175.
  37. McGregor, P.K. (ed.). 2005. Animal communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. McMahon, A.M.S. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 1999. „On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: a game-theoretic model”. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 61. 1151–1186.
  40. Mitteldorf, J. and D.S. Wilson. 2000. „Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204. 481–496.
  41. Pennycook, A. 1994. The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.
  42. Phillipson, R. 2001. „Global English and local language policies: what Denmark needs”. Language Problems and Language Planning 25.1. 1–24.
  43. Phinney, J.S. 1990. „Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research”. Psychological Bulletin 108.3. 499–514.
  44. Puppel, S. 2004. „An outline of a domain-resource-agent access-management (DRAAM) model of human communication: towards an ecology of human communication”. Working Papers of the Department of Ecocommunication Oikeios Logos Nr 1. 1–26.
  45. Puppel, S. 2007. „Interlingwalizm czy translingwalizm? Interkomunikacja czy transkomunikacja? Uwagi w kontekście współistnienia języków naturalnych w ramach globalnej wspólnoty kulturowo- językowo-komunikacyjnej”. Społeczeństwo-kultura-język. W stronę interakcyjnej architektury komunikacji. Poznań: Zakład Graficzny UAM. 79–94.
  46. Puppel, S. 2007. Ochrona języków naturalnych. Poznań: Zakład Graficzny UAM.
  47. Puppel, S. 2007. „Tężyzna języków naturalnych”. In: Chałacińska-Wiertelak, H. and K. Kropaczewski (eds.). 7–15.
  48. Puppel, S. (Forthcoming). „Natural language robustness-, natural language’ viscosity’-, and teacher population density-dependence as co-indicators of success in foreign/second language teaching and learning: a combined ecolinguistic-rheolinguistic approach to English”.
  49. Puppel, S. and J. Puppel. 2005. „Zagadnienie percepcji języka naturalnego w triadzie: język ojczysty-język globalny-język sąsiedni na przykładzie triady: język polski-język angielski-język
  50. niemiecki w ujęciu ekolingwistycznym: próba typologii”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia VII. 55–95.
  51. Ricento, T. 1994. „Review of linguistic imperialism”. TESOL Quarterly 28. 421–427.
  52. Ricento, T. (ed.). 2000. Ideology, politics and language policies: focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  53. Sakiyama, O., F. Endo, H. Watanabe and F. Sasama (eds.). 2001. Lectures on endangered languages: 4 – from Kyoto Conference 2001. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin University.
  54. Shaw, P.A. 2001a. „Language and identity, language and the land”. British Columbia Studies 131. 39–55.
  55. Shaw, P.A. 2001b. „Responsibility, reciprocity, and respect in endangered language research”. In Sakiyama, O. et al. (eds.). 181–194.
  56. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2000. Linguistic genocide in education – or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  57. Thomason, S.G. 2001. Language contact: an introduction. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  58. Trask, R.L. 1994. Language change. London: Routledge.
  59. Tse, L. 1998. „Ethnic identity formation and its implications for heritage language development”. In Krashen, S.D. et al. (eds.). 15–30.
  60. Vehrencamp, S.L. 1983. „A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies”. Animal Behaviour 31. 667–682.
  61. Wong, F.L. 1991. „When learning a second language means losing the first”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6. 323–346.
  62. Wurm, S.A. (ed.). 2001. Atlas of the world’s languages in danger of disappearing. 2nd ed. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.