Przyszłość form konsensualnych w postępowaniu administracyjnym

Main Article Content

Joanna Wegner

Abstrakt

The article presents the institution of an administrative agreement from the perspec-tive of legal solutions in force in selected European countries. The increase in the number and diversity of tasks performed by the administration and the multitude of conducted proceedings encourage the search for alternative forms of settling a case in relation to an administrative decision. The administrative agreement is one of them. The analysis of foreign regulations confirms that the institution in question belongs to the modern procedural laws. The scope of regulation varies, as do the individual solutions concerning the admissibility and mode of concluding the contract, its subject matter, the mechanisms for removing defects, the grounds for contestability of the contract and its enforceability. It turns out that in individual European orders two patterns of regulation dominate: French and German, although they are subject to significant modifications. The performance of certain public tasks by private parties on the basis of an administrative agreement provides for certain guarantees not only for the parties to the agreement but also for the beneficiaries of those tasks. This particular type of contract allows adequate protection of the public interest. The prevalence of the administrative agreement in Europe prompts the author to formulate a conclusion on the need to include this institution in the home system. The attempt made in the 2017 reform of the Administrative Procedure Code to include in it an administrative agreement was unsuccessful. The provisions on an administrative agreement that were then drafted were intended to give a deeper meaning to mediation, a new institution in administrative proceedings, which is currently not popular. Mediation was to precede the conclusion of an administrative agreement. However, there are no significant obstacles to returning to work on the regulation of this institution, which is so widely used in other European countries, and which is clearly lacking in its home Code

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Wegner, J. (2019). Przyszłość form konsensualnych w postępowaniu administracyjnym. Studia Prawa Publicznego, (2(26), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.14746/spp.2019.2.26.2
Dział
Artykuły
Biogram autora

Joanna Wegner, Uniwersytet Łódzki

Joanna Wegner, prof. UŁ dr hab., Uniwersytet Łódzki, e-mail: jwegner@wpia.uni.lodz.pl, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-6651

Bibliografia

  1. Correia S., Da Conferencia Procidemental, „Jurisdiçáo Administrativa e Fiscal” Octubro 2016.
  2. Folliard P., Droit administratif, Paris 2008.
  3. Frenzen D., The Administrative Contract in the United States, „George Washington Law Review” 1968, vol. 37, no. 2.
  4. Kmieciak Z., Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne a prawo europejskie, Warszawa 2010.
  5. Kmieciak Z., Odwołania w postępowaniu administracyjnym, Warszawa 2011.
  6. Kmieciak Z., Idea procedur administracyjnych trzeciej generacji (na przykładzie postępowania w sprawach dofinansowania projektów w ramach programów operacyjnych), „Państwo i Prawo” 2015, z. 5
  7. Koprić, P. Kovač, V. Đulabić, J. Džinić, Comparative Study. Legal Remedies in Administrative Procedures in Western Balkans, Branelovica, Montenegro 2016.
  8. Krawczyk A., Umowa administracyjna, w: Reforma prawa o postępowaniu administracyjnym. Raport zespołu eksperckiego, pod red. Z. Kmieciaka, Warszawa 2016.
  9. Le Mestre R., Termes du droit administratif, Paris 2006.
  10. Lipowicz I., Prawne formy działania administracji publicznej – między stabilizacją a potrzebą przełomu, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2016, z. 4.
  11. Maenpaa O., Hallintosopimus (Administrative Contract) (Vammala 1988), Encyclopædia iuridica fennica, Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistys 1994–1999.
  12. Oliveira R.E.de, O acto administrativo contratual, „Justiça Administrativa” 2007, N° 63.
  13. Pascariu L.T R.E.., Current Guidelines in the Field of Administrative Contracts, „The Annals of The ‘Ştefan cel Mare’ University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration” 2010, vol. 10, no. 2(12).
  14. Pascariu L.T., The Distinction of the Administrative Contract from Other Types of Contracts, „The Annals of The ‘Ştefan cel Mare’ University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration” 2010, vol. 10, Special Number.
  15. Rypina M., Wierzbowski M., Umowa z organem w postępowaniu administracyjnym, „Państwo i Prawo” 2010.
  16. Sierpowska I., Pomoc społeczna jako administracja świadcząca. Studium administracyjnoprawne, Warszawa 2012.
  17. Speidel R.E., Judicial and Administrative Review of Government Contract Awards, „Law and Contemporary Problems” 1972, vol. 37, no. 1.
  18. Staša J., M. Tomǎšek, Codification of Administrative Procedure, „The Lawyer Quarterly” 2012, no. 2.
  19. Vieira de Andrade J.C., Lições de Direito Administrativo, Coimbra 2015.