Abstract
The ongoing debate in the EU and the US over the shape of the Internet focuses mainly on the technological and economical aspects of the issue. This paper is meant to be an introduction to the debate on the impact of the network neutrality on free speech and the right to information in the field of political science. The author tries to identify potential threats from the economic, technological and political perspective, as they are strongly interconnected. Fundamental human rights can benefit from enforcing network neutrality regulations; however, a much more important issue is related to the question of what would happen to the freedom of speech and the right of information if the regulations were gone.
References
A Rule by the Federal Communications Commission on 04/13/2015 Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet (2015), https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet, 20.08.2016.
Akmai’s [State of the Internet] Q1 2017 Report, https://www.akamai.com/us/en/multimedia/documents/state-of-the-internet/q1-2017-state-of-the-internet-connectivity-report.pdf, 14.08.2017.
BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules (2016), http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/6160-berec-guidelines-on-the implementation-by-national-regulators-of-european-net-neutrality-rules, 23.05.2017.
Blake V. (2014), Net neutrality: Free market will self-regulate, http://exclusive.multibriefs.com/content/net-neutrality-free-market-will-self-regulate/communications, 04.02.2016.
Brotman S. (2017), Net neutrality 2.0: Perspectives on FCC regulation of internet service providers, https://www.brookings.edu/research/net-neutrality-2-0- perspectives-on-fcc-regulation-of-internet-service-providers/, 9.08.2017.
Cammaerts B. (2011), Net-Neutrality: The First Amendment of the Internet, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39658/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-NetNeutrality_The_First_Amendment_ of_the_Internet.pdf, 24.05.2013.
FCC Comcast Ruling (2008), https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf, 17.08.2016.
Global Internet User Survey (2012), http://internetsociety.ngo/internet/global-internet-user-survey-2012, 25.08.2016.
Guo H., Bandyopadhyay S., Cheng H. K., Yang Y. (2010), Net Neutrality and Vertical Integration of Content and Broadband Services, Journal of Management Information Systems, 27:2, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220591431_Net_Neutrality_and_Vertical_Integration_of_Content_and_Broadband_Services, 20.12.2016.
Hahn R. W., Wallsten S. (2006), The Economics of Net Neutrality, AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. RP06-13, https://ssrn.com/abstract=943757, 10.10.2017.
Internet Live Stats, http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/, 12.11.2017.
Kang C. (2017), F.C.C. Is Said to Plan Repeal of Net Neutrality Rules, “The New York Times,” November 21, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/technology/fccrepeal-net-neutrality.html, 24.11.2017.
Kang C. (2016), Court Backs Rules Treating Internet as Utility, Not Luxury, “The New York Times,” June 15, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/technology/net-neutrality-fcc-appeals-court-ruling.html, 23.04.2017.
Krämer J., Wiewiorra L., Weinhardt C. (2013), Net neutrality: A progress report, “Telecommunications Policy,” vol. 37, issue 9, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596112001450, 13.04.2015.
La Rue F. (2011), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/132/01/PDF/G1113201.pdf, 23.08.2016.
Lemley M. A., Lessig L. (2001), The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era, 48 UCLA L. REV. 925.
Letter expressing strong opposition to proposals to classify broadband as a ‘Title II’ service (2014), https://www.tiaonline.org/sites/default/files/pages/Internet_ecosystem_letter_FINAL_12.10.14.pdf, 03.06.2016.
Marcus J. S. (2016), Comparing Frameworks of Regulation and Governance: Cross-Discipline and Cross-Border Strategies, “Colorado Technology Law Journal,” vol. 14, Issue 2.
McDiarmid A., Shears M. (2016), The Importance of Internet Neutrality to Protecting Human Rights Online, in: Net Neutrality Compendium. Human Rights, Free Competition and the Future of the Internet, eds. L. Belli, P. De Filippi.
Net neutrality: one year after, a dark picture (2017), https://www.laquadrature.net/en/net-neutrality-one-year-after-dark-picture, 24.08.2017.
Raport o stanie rynku telekomunikacyjnego w 2016 roku (2017), https://www.uke.gov.pl/raport-o-stanie-rynku-telekomunikacyjnego-w-2016-roku-22341, 15.09.2017.
Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (2015), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R2120, 23.08.2016.
Saltzer J. H., David P. Reed D. P., Clark D. D. (1984), End-to-end arguments in system design, in ACM Transactions on Computer Systems nr 2.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), http://www.un.org/en/universaldeclaration-human-rights/, 2016.01.30.
What is zero rating? (2017), http://berec.europa.eu/eng/netneutrality/zero_rating/, 18.10.2017.
Wu T. (2003), Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination, “Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law,” vol. 2, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=388863, 29.09.2008.
License
Articles published in "Central European Political Studies" are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License (CC BY 4.0). They may be copied, redistributed and shared only if appropriate credit is given.