Abstract
The article is devoted to an analysis of the works of women writers from Central Ukraine during the 1920s and 1930s from the point of view of their cultural identification in the new Soviet reality. Currently, most of these women authors are unexplored and exist outside the literary canon. Feminist, cultural and sociological studies provide the theoretical framework for the article. The aim of the research is to find out how women’s literature from that time was positioned in the cultural and political space and the literary hierarchy. We distinguish three groups of women writers based on a study of their aesthetic basis and ideological beliefs, – Ukrainian writers, Proletarian writers, and Soviet writers. The first group was characterized by an appeal to modernist aesthetics and national issues. The work of the second group was inspired by proletarian aesthetics, themes of revolutionary struggle and women’s experience of various social groups. The work of the third group was based on the method of socialist realism, the theme of building a new Soviet reality, and the search for the place and role of women in the historical context.
References
Aheieva V., Cholovichyi psevdonim i zhinocha nezalezhnist. (Sproba hinokrytyky) [Male pseudonym and female independence. (Attempt at gynocriticism)], [v:] „Mahisterium. Literaturoznavchi studii”, 2000, vyp. 4, s. 31–36.
Bahtin M., Iz zapisey 1970–1971 goda [From the records of 1970–1971], [v:] M. Bahtin, Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva, Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1979, s. 336–360.
Voronyna M., Zakonodavchi zminy shchodo pravovoho stanovyshcha zhinok do Zhovtnevoho perevorotu [Legislative changes from the legal framework of women to the Zhovtnevy shift], [v:] Ukrainski zhinky u hornyli modernizatsii, red. O. Kis’, Kharkiv: Klub simeinoho dozvillia, 2017, s. 131–155.
Humenna D., Dar Evdotei. Ispyt pamiati. Knyha persha. Knyha druha [The gift of Eudotheus. Memory test. Book one. Book two], Kyiv: Dnipro, 2004.
Desiat rokiv ukrainskoi literatury (1917–1927) [Ten years of Ukrainian literature (1917–1927)], v 2 tomakh, upor. A. Leites, M. Yashek, t. 2, Kharkiv: DVU, 1928.
Yekelchyk S., Imperiia pamiati. Rosiisko-ukrainski stosunky v radianskii istorychnii uiavi [Stalin’s Empire of Memory Russian-Ukrainian Relations in the Soviet Historical Imagination], Kyiv: Krytyka, 2008.
Labur O., „Nova zhinka”: unormovani obrazy zhinky-suspilnytsi i zhinky-trudivnytsi v radianskii literaturi Ukrainy 1920–1930-kh rokiv [“New Woman”: Normalized Images of Women Social Workers and Women Workers in Soviet Literature of Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s], [v:] „Kraieznavstvo”, 2010, vyp. 3, s. 205–213.
Lotman Yu., Semiotika kulturyi i ponyatie teksta [Semiotics of culture and the concept of text], [v:] Yu. Lotman, Izbrannyie stati v treh tomah, Tallinn: „Aleksandra”, 1992, t. 1, s. 129–132.
Lushchii S., Mariia Halych u koli lankivtsiv [Maria Halych in the circle of Lankivtsiv], [v:] „Slovo i Chas”, 2010, no. 4, s. 21–34.
Lutskyi Yu., Literaturna polityka v Radianskii Ukraini 1917–1934 [Literary Politics in the Soviet Ukraine: 1917–1934], Kyiv: Helikon, 2000.
Pavlychko S., Dyskurs modernizmu v ukrainskii literature [The discourse of modernism in Ukrainian literature], Kyiv: Lybid, 1999.
Petrov V., Ukrainska intelihentsiia – zhertva bolshevytskoho teroru [The Ukrainian intelligentsia is a victim of Bolshevik terror], [v:] Viktor Petrov, Rozvidky, Kyiv: Tempora, 2013, t. 2, s. 655–714.
Platforma ideolohichna y khudozhnia spilky selianskykh pysmennykiv „Pluhu” [Platform ideological and artistic union of peasant writers “Pluh”], [v:] Desiat rokiv ukrainskoi literatury (1917– 1927), red. M. Yashek, A. Leites, Kharkiv: DVU, 1928, t. II, s. 73–77.
Rudiachenko O., Veronika Cherniakhivska. Na kholodnomu nebi blymaiut zori [Veronika Chernyakhivska. The stars twinkle in the cold sky], [v:] Elektronnyi resurs: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-culture/3230640-veronika-cernahivska-na-holodnomu-nebi-blimautzori.html (16.12.2021).
Stelmakh Kh., Teorii zhinochoho pysma ta feministychna krytyka [Theories of women’s writing and feminist criticism], [v:] „Komparatyvni doslidzhenniakh slovianskykh mov i literatury”, 2012, vyp. 19, s. 357–365.
Kharlan O., Poetyka povsiakdennoho prostoru u prozi Marii Halych i Zofi Nalkovskoi [Poetics of everyday space in the prose of Maria Halych and Zofya Nalkovska], [v:] „Kyivski polonistychni studii”, 2011, t. 18, s. 260–263.
Showalter E., Feministychna krytyka u pushchi [Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness], [v:] Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX st., red. M. Zubrytska, Lviv: LitOpys, 1996, s. 512–537.
Shtompka P., Sotsiologiya sotsialnyih izmeneniy [The Sociology of Social Change], Moskva: Aspekt Press, 1996.
Yakubskyi B., Do vzaiemyn marksivskoi metod z starymy metodamy literaturoznavstva [To the relationship of Marx’s method with the old methods of literary criticism], [v:] „Zhyttia i revoliutsiia”, 1928, no. 2, s. 54–65.
Bourdieu P., The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Standford University Press, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615861
Demska-Budzuliak L., Od Mawki do Kassandry. Kobiecy głos w dyskursie totalitaryzmy. Na materiale ukraińskiego dyskursu krytyczno-literackiego lat 20. i 30. XX w. [From Mawka to Kassandra. A female voice in the discourse of totalitarianism. On the material of the Ukrainian critical and literary discourse of the 20s and 30s of the XXth century], [w:] Wspólnota wyobrażona. Pisarki Europy Środkowej wobec problemów literackich, społecznych i politycznych lat 1914–1945, red. G. Borkowska, I. Boruszkowska, K. Nadana-Sokołowska, Warszawa: IBL PAN, 2017, s. 9–24.
Grosz E., Space, Time and Perversion, [in:] Essays on the Politics of Bodies, by E. Grosz, New York– London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 9–24.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Łesia Demska-Budzulak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person.The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
- The Author grants the Purchaser non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons. - The Author grants the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan permission to:
3.1. reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
3.2. send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases. - The Author declares that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled and obliged to allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the attributed license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons. Thereby, the Author entitles all interested parties to use the work, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
4.1. acknowledgment of authorship, i.e. observing the obligation to provide, along with the distributed work, information about the author, title, source (link to the original Work, DOI) and of the license itself.
4.2. the derivatives of the Work are subject to the same conditions, i.e. they may be published only based on a licence which would be identical to the one granting access to the original Work. - The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań is obliged to
5.1. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.2. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
Other provisions
- The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań hereby preserves the copyright to the journal as a whole (layout/stylesheet, graphics, cover design, logo etc.)