Abstrakt
The question of the form of Pelleas und Melisande is a vexed one, and has been so since Berg’s 1920 Kurze Thematische Analyse. Berg described it as ‘[n]ever […] purely descriptive’ but against popular viewpoints claimed it is in symphonic form. Derrick Puffett attributed this stance to Berg’s ‘clear historicist agenda’ to ‘reaffirm the traditionalism at the heart of the Second Viennese School’s view of itself ’. In the minds of contemporary scholars, the attested ‘purity’ of the sonata form could not be associated with this ‘inferior’ programme music. This article describes the interaction between the two aspects—programme and form—focussing in particular upon the way in which this interaction simultaneously appears to refuse sonata form, in a manner seemingly analogous to Freudian repression, while also staging the sonata cycle through the deployment of a topical narrative. This description is intimately informed by conceptions of multivalence, as theorised in musical terms by James Webster but, perhaps more importantly here, in more general semiotic terms by Barthes. Finally, through mapping the topical reading onto Vande Moortele’s taxonomic system and his analysis of the piece the hidden agendas of the repressed form are exposed in a work known for its thematic and formal uncertainty.
Bibliografia
Berg Henk De, Freud’s Theory and its Use in Literary and Cultural Studies. An Introduction, Boydell & Brewer Ltd, Suffolk 2004.
Cherlin Michael, Schoenberg’s Musical Imagination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481987
Dahlhaus Carl, Schoenberg and Programme Music, [in:] idem, Schoenberg and the New Music, transl. Derrick Puffett, Alfred Clayton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
Freud Sigmund, The Uncanny, first published in Imago, Bd. V.; reprinted in Sammlung, Fünfte Folge, transl. Alix Strachey, 1919.
Freytag Gustav, Technique of the Drama, transl. Elias J. McEwan, Scott Foresman and Company, Chicago 1900.
Haimo Ethan, Schoenberg’s Transformation of Musical Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
Heartz Daniel, Alan Brown Bruce, Empfindsamkeit, [in:] Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online, www.oxford-music-online.com.wam.leeds.ac.uk/subscriber/article/grove/music/08774 (access: 5.05.2011).
Hood Danielle, Doubles and Duplicity. Topics in Vienna around the Long Fin-de-Siècle, 1874–1928, Ph.D. diss., The University of Leeds 2015.
Lavers Annette, Roland Barthes, Structuralism and After, Methuen & Co, London 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772335
Puffett Derek, ‘Music that Echoes within One’ for a Lifetime. Berg’s Reception of Schoenberg’s ‘Pelleas und Melisande’, “Music & Letters” 1995, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 209–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/76.2.209
Rank Otto, Der Döppelganger, Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Vienna 1925.
Rosenblatt Louise M., The Reader, the Text, the Poem. The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale 1978.
Rosenfield Claire, The Shadow Within. The Conscious and Unconscious Use of the Double, “Daedalus” 1963, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 326–344.
Vande Moortele Steven, Two Dimensional Sonata Form. Form and Cycle in Single-Movement Instrumental Works by Liszt, Strauss, Schoenberg, and Zemlinsky, Leuven University Press, Leuven 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qf14r
Webster James, Formenlehre in Theory and Practice, [in:] Musical Forms, Form and Formenlehre, ed. Pieter Bergé, Leuven University Press, Leuven 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qf01v.13
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Danielle Hood

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.