Keywords
sex
perception
single-sex education
foreign language learning
pronunciation
How to Cite
Number of views: 873
Number of downloads: 743
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to present the findings of an empirical study which contributes to the ongoing research into gender effects on second language acquisition by exploring a biological influence on L2 pronunciation learning. One of the most frequent arguments used to vindicate single-sex education is that there are substantial sensory and perceptual differences between males and females which rationalize gender-specific teaching methods and gender-segregation at schools. The present study provides some preliminary insights into the perception of selected phonetic contrasts by Polish secondary school learners with the aim of investigating gender-based similarities and differences in the accuracy of sound recognition by males and females. The findings suggest that a commonly cited female advantage in acquiring L2 pronunciation cannot be attributed to their superior phonetic perception, as male participants performed equally well and identified the same number of English segments correctly.
References
Almbark, R. A. (2014). Perception and production of SSBE vowels by foreign language learners: Towards a foreign language model. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 3-18.
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44(3), 231-250.
Balas, A. (2018). English vowel perception by Polish advanced learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 63(3), 309-338.
Bauer D. J., Goldfield, B. A., & Reznick, J. S. (2002). Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 313-335.
Beltz, A. M., Blakemore, J. E. O., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2013). Sex differences in brain and behavioural development. In H. Tager-Flusberg, P. Rakic, & J. Rubenstein (Eds.), Comprehensive developmental neuroscience: Vol. 3. Neural circuit development and function in the healthy and diseased brain (pp. 467-499). Elsevier.
Bent, T. (2005). Perception and production of non-native prosodic categories. [Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34958240_Perception_and_production_of_non-native_prosodic_categories
Besson, M., Magne, C., & Schön, D. (2002). Emotional prosody: Sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 405-407.
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-like phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 233-277). MIT Press.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13-34). John Benjamins.
Bogacka, A. (2004). On the perception of English lax vowels by Polish learners of English. In E. Daskalaki, N. Katos, M. Mavrogiorgos, & M. Reeve (Eds.), CamLing 2004: Proceedings of the University of Cambridge Second Postgraduate Conference in Language Research (pp. 43-50). Cambridge University Press.
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279-302). York Press.
Bowman, D. M., Brown, D. K., & Kimberley, B. P. (2000). An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hearing Research, 142(1-2), 1-11.
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977-985.
Bryła-Cruz, A. (2016). Foreign accent perception: Polish English in the British ears. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bryła-Cruz, A. (2017). Rola fonetyki w słuchaniu ze zrozumieniem: Analiza tegorocznej matury z języka angielskiego. Języki Obce w Szkole, 2, 68-73.
Burman, D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1349-1362.
Cahill, L. (2014). Fundamental sex difference in human brain architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 577-578.
Clements, A., Rimrodt, S., Blankner, J., Mostofsky, S., Pekar, J., Denckla, M., & Cutting, L. (2006). Sex differences in cerebral laterality of language and visuospatial processing. Brain and Language, 98, 150-158.
Chadwell, D. W. (2010). A gendered choice: Designing and implementing single-sex programs and schools. Corwin.
Christova, P. S., Lewis, S. M., Tagaris, G. A., Ugurbil, K., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2008). A voxel-by-voxel parametric fMRI study of motor mental rotation: Hemispheric specialization and gender differences in neural processing efficiency. Experimental Brain Research, 189(1), 79-90.
Coley, R. J. (2001). Differences in the gender gap: Comparisons across racial/ethnic groups in education and work. Educational Testing Service.
Coney, J. (2002). Lateral asymmetry in phonological processing: Relating behavioural measures to neuroimaged structures. Brain and Language, 80, 355-365.
Corazzi, V., Ciorba, A., Skarżyński, P., Skarżyńska, M., Bianchini, C., Stomeo, F., Bellini, T., Pelucchi, S., & Hatzopoulos, S. (2020). Gender differences in audio-vestibular disorders. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 34, 1-5.
Couper, G. (2011). What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: Socially-constructed metalanguage and critical listening. Language Awareness, 20(3), 159-182.
Crossland, J. (2008). The myths surrounding ‘brain-based’ learning. The School Science Review, 90(330), 119-121.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
Diaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 249-273.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes, and globalization: A Hungarian perspective. Multilingual Matters.
Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 129, 421-426.
Eliot, L. (2011). Single-sex education and the brain. Sex-Roles, 69, 363-381.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. LOT.
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In P. Boersma & S. Hamann (Eds.), Phonology in perception (pp. 152-190). Mouton de Gruyter.
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. C. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 452-465.
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.
Field, K. (2000). Why are girls better at modern foreign languages than boys? In K. Field (Ed.), Issues in modern foreign language teaching (pp. 125-135). Routledge.
Flege, J. E. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 249-289). John Benjamins.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 233-277). York Press.
Flege, J.E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honour of Henning Wode (pp. 217-244). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in non-native speaker interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Newbury House.
Główka, D. (2014). The impact of gender on attainment in learning English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 617-635.
Gómez Lacabex, E., García Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M. (2005). English vowel reduction by untrained Spanish learners. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251867220_English_Vowel_Reduction_by_Untrained_Spanish_Learners_Perception_and_Production
Grasseger, H. (1991). Perception and production of Italian plosives by Italian learners. Actes du XIIème Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques, 5, 290-293.
Gonet, W. (2010). Dispelling the myth of word-final obstruent voicing in English: New facts and pedagogical implications. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in accents of English 2 (pp. 361-376). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., & Święciński, R. (2013a). Acquiring angma: The velar nasal in advanced learners’ English. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in accents of English 2 (pp. 49-58). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., & Święciński, R. (2013b). Clashes with ashes. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in accents of English 2 (pp. 213-232). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
Hancock, M. (2003). English pronunciation in use intermediate. Cambridge University Press.
Hansen Edwards, J. (2008). Social factors and variation in production in L2 phonology. In M. Zampini & J. G. Hansen Edwards (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 251-279). John Benjamins.
Holthouse, D. (2010). Gender segregation: Separate but effective? Teaching Tolerance, 37, 25-27.
Hughes, T. (2006). The advantages of single-sex education. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 23(2), 5-14.
Imaizumi, S., Homma, M., Ozawa, Y., Maruishi, M., & Muaranaka, H. (2004). Gender differences in emotional prosody processing: An fMRI study. Psychologia, 47, 113-124.
James, A. (2009). Teaching the female brain: How girls learn science and math. Corwin.
Jiang, M., Green, R., Henley, T., & Masten, W. (2009). Acculturation in relation to the acquisition of a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30, 481-492.
Kansaku, K., Yamaura, A., & Kitazawa, S. (2000). Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas. Cerebral Cortex, 10(9), 866-872.
Keating, D., Turrell, G., & Ozanne, A. (2001). Childhood speech disorders: Reported prevalence, comorbidity and socioeconomic profile. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 37, 431-436.
Kosky, C., & Boothroyd, A. (2003). Perception and production of sibilants by children with hearing loss: A training study. The Volta Review, 103, 71-98.
Krizman, J., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Sex differences in auditory subcortical function. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(3), 590-597.
Kurth, F., Jancke, L., & Luders, E. (2017). Sexual dimorphism of Broca’s region: More gray matter in female brains in Brodmann areas 44 and 45. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1-2), 626-632.
Lange, B. P., Euler, H. A, & Zaretsky, E. (2016). Sex differences in language competence of 3- to 6-year-old children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1417-1438.
Leather, J. & James, A. (1991). The acquisition of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 305-341.
Liben, L. (2015). Probability values and human values in single-sex education. Sex Roles, 72, 401-426.
de Lima Xavier, L., Hanekamp, S., & Simonyan, K. (2019). Sexual dimorphism within brain regions controlling speech production. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13(795), 1-7.
Lindell, A., & Lum, J. (2008). Priming vs. rhyming: Orthographic versus phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres. Brain and Language, 68, 193-203.
Longman Vocabulary Checker. http://global.longmandictionaries.com/vocabulary_checker
McAllister, R. (1997). Perception and production of a second language and the concept of foreign accent. In Leather, J. & A. James (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international symposium on the acquisition of second-language speech ‘New Sounds ‘97’ (pp. 206-214). University of Klagenfurt.
McAllister, R., Flege, J. E., Piske, T. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 229-258.
McFadden, D. (1998). Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14(2/3), 261-298.
McFadden, D., Martin, G. K., Stagner, B. B., & Maloney, M. M. (2009). Sex differences in distortion product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 125, 239-246.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2004). Gender differences and preferred learning environment in a foreign language classroom. In J. Arabski (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 183-192). Universitas.
Mori, S., & Gobel, P. (2006). Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System, 34(2), 194-210.
Moyer, A. (2016). The puzzle of gender effects in phonology. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(1), 8-28.
Murphy, B. (2010). Foreign language learning in Irish second level schools: Gender very much on the agenda. Irish Educational Studies, 29, 81-95.
Nowacka, M. (2008). Phonetic attainment in Polish university and college students of English: A study in the productive and receptive pronunciation skills. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Maria Curie-Skłodowska University.
Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal, 3(2), 273-287.
Obleser, J., Eulitz, C., Lahiri, A., & Elbert, T. (2001). Gender differences in functional hemispheric asymmetry during processing of vowels as reflected by the human brain magnetic response. Neuroscience Letters, 314(3), 131-134.
Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300.
Parsloe, R. (1998). Use of the speech pattern audiometer and the electropalatograph to explore the speech production/perception relationship in a profoundly deaf child. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33(1), 109-121.
Pavlenko, A., & Piller, P. (2008). Language education and gender. In S. May (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 1 (2nd ed.) (pp. 57-69). Springer.
Pedersen, K., Rosenhall, U., & Metier, M. (1989). Changes in pure-tone thresholds in individuals aged 70-81: Results from a longitudinal study. Audiology, 28, 194-204.
Pell, M. D., & Baum, S. R. (1997). The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain-damaged adults. Brain and Language, 57, 80-99.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912.
Reber, J., & Tranel, D. (2017). Sex differences in the functional lateralization of emotion and decision-making in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1-2), 270-278.
Riordan, C. (2015). Single-sex schools: A place to learn. Rowman & Littlefield.
Rochet, B. L. (1995). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 379-410). York Press.
Rojczyk, A. (2010). Temporal and spectral parameters in perception of the voicing contrast in English and Polish. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Ruigrok, A. N., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M. C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and Biohehavioural Reviews, 39, 34-50.
Rymarczyk, K., & Grabowska, A. (2007). Sex differences, in brain control of prosody. Neuropsychologia, 45, 921-930.
Sacher, J., Neumann, J., Okon-Singer, H., Gotowiec, S., & Villringer, A. (2013). Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: Evidence from neuroimaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 31(3), 366-375.
Salomone, R. (2003). Same, different, equal: Rethinking single-sex schooling. Yale University Press.
Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. Doubleday.
Sax, L., Arms, E., Woodruff, M., Riggers, T., & Eagan, M. M. (2009). Women graduates of single-sex and coeducational high schools: Differences in their characteristics and the transition to college. The Sudikoff Family Institution for Education and New Media.
Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., &. Friederici, A. D (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 228-233.
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright R. K., Bronen, R. A. , Fletcher, J. M. , Shankweller, D. P. , Katz, L., & Gore, J. C. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373, 607-609.
Smith, L. C. (2001). L2 acquisition of English liquids: Evidence for production independent from perception. In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, Ch. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present, and future of second language research (pp. 3-22). Cascadilla Press.
Sobkowiak, W. (1996). English phonetics for Poles. Bene Nati.
Sommer, I., Aleman, A., Bouma, A., & Kahn, R. (2004). Do women really have a more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain, 127, 1845-1852.
Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1578-1593.
Sung, H., & Padilla, A. (1998). Student motivation, parental attitudes, and involvement in the learning of Asian languages in elementary and secondary schools. Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 205-216.
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. M. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to the second language. Language and Speech, 24, 265-272.
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41, 177-204.
Underbakke, M. E. (1993). Hearing the difference: Improving Japanese students’ pronunciation of a second language through listening. Language Quarterly, 31, 67-89.
van den Doel, R. (2006). How friendly are the natives? An evaluation of native-speaker judgements of foreign-accented British and American English. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).
Voyer, S. D., & Voyer, D. (2015). Laterality, spatial abilities and accident proneness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(1), 27-36.
Wallentin, M. (2009). Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain and Language, 108, 175-183.
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Phonetic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033-1043.
Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U. (2002). French is the language of love and stuff: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Research Journal, 28(4), 503-508.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.