Keywords
output tasks
vocabulary learning
vocabulary retention
working memory
How to Cite
Number of views: 317
Number of downloads: 347
Abstract
Working memory (WM) is essential to vocabulary learning. However, limited attention has been paid to young beginner learners’ vocabulary development under various task conditions from the perspective of WM. This study investigates how two types of WM – complex WM and phonological short-term memory – may influence two instructional approaches (i.e., input and output tasks) on picking up new words. 93 young learners studying English as a foreign language (EFL) participated in input and output tasks and four vocabulary assessments. These assessments functioned as a pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest. The participants also took two WM tests: an operation span test for complex WM and a word repetition test for phonological short-term memory. The results demonstrated that: (1) both input and output tasks significantly influenced the learning and retention of new words, (2) complex WM did not substantially predict task effects on the learning and retention of new words, and (3) phonological WM had a notable impact on learning and retaining new words under the input and output task conditions. The findings emphasize the role of WM for EFL young learners’ vocabulary learning through tasks.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Erlbaum.
Atkins, P. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(4), 537-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010353
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature, Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Aca-demic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J. & Allen, R. J. (2019). From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model. Memory & Cognition, 47, 575-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0878-5
Bergström, D., Norberg, C., & Nordlund, M. (2022). “Words are picked up along the way” – Swedish EFL teachers’ conceptualizations of vocabu-lary knowledge and learning. Language Awareness, 31(4), 393-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1893326
Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016). The effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish Gustar Structures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 265-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139
Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 867-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.32.5.867
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Wilhelm, O. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspective on learn-ing and practical second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Wil-liams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97-113). Lawrence Erlbaum.
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl 2), 189-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x
de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabu-lary: The role of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102001043
de la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr196oa
Duong, P.-T., Montero Perez, M., Desmet, P., & Peters, E. (2021). Differential effects of input-based and output-based tasks on L2 vocabulary learning. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 24(3), 120-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31183
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014698
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford Univer-sity Press.
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30, 419-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00047-7
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x
Engel, M., & Gathercole, E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974-986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028390
Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2018). Task-based language teaching for beginner-level learners of L2 French: An exploratory study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3831
Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2019). Input-based tasks for beginner-level learners: An approximate replication and extension of Erlam & Ellis (2018). Language Teaching, 52(4), 490-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000216
Gary, G., & Macken, B. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009
Gasser, M., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Learning nouns and adjectives: A connectionist account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 269-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386537
Gathercole, S. (2006) Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060383
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phono-logical STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 200-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90044-2
Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A(1), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000002
Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2018). Aptitude-treatment interaction in L2 learning: A research synthesis. Studies in English Education, 4, 803-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22275/SEE.23.4.02
Henriksen, B. (2008). Declarative lexical knowledge. In D. Albrechtsen, K. Haastrup, & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language (pp. 22-66). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593404_2
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1999). Interaction hypothesis. Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching (p. 174). Blackwell Publishers.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1982.tb00476.x
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26(2), 175-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00002-5
Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 149-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149
Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 687-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559797
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x
Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (Eds.). (2022). Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546
Liu, Y. T., Nassaji, H., & Tseng, W. T. (2021). Effects of internal and external attentional manipulations and working memory on second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211030130
Ma, Q., & Sin, C. (2015). Teaching young learners English vocabulary with reading-based exercises in a real classroom situation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 125-138.
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 179-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125
McDonald, J. A., & Reynolds, B.L. (2023). Learning semantic and thematic vocabulary clusters through embedded instruction: Effects on very young English learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(5), 1129-1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0102
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339-364). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 46-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x
Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
Schmitt, N., & Redwood, S. (2011). Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora: In honor of Sylviane Granger (pp. 173-209). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch
Shintani, N. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388692
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.
Takimoto, M. (2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049
Teng, F. (2018). The effect of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on the acquisition of phrasal verbs by Chinese students. Asian EFL Journal, 20 (2), 136-164.
Teng, F. (2020). Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 785-812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829026
Teng, F. (2022). The roles of second-language proficiency level and working memory on vocabulary learning from word-focused exercises. RELC Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221102228
Teng, F. (2023). Effectiveness of captioned videos for incidental vocabulary learning and retention: The role of working memory. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nz5pg
Teng, F., & Zhang, D. (2023). The associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(3), 1021-1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0130
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-32). Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610195
Vogan, V. M., Morgan, B. R., Powell, T. L., Smith, M. L., & Taylor, M. J. (2016). The neurodevelopmental differences of increasing verbal working memory demand in children and adults. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 19-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.008
Webb, S. A., & Chang, A, C.-S. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading: How does frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 667-686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559800
Yang, Y., Shintani, N., Li, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The effectiveness of post-reading word-focused activities and their associations with working memory. System, 70, 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012
Yeung, S. S., Ng, M. L., Qiao, S., & Tsang, A. (2019). Effects of explicit L2 vocabulary instruction on developing kindergarten children’s target and general vocabulary and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 671-689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09982-3
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mark Feng Teng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.