Keywords
learning target
learning context
orchestration
number
frequency
How to Cite
Number of views: 1670
Number of downloads: 792
Abstract
The language learning strategy question has been debated on a number of levels, including definition, the strategy/success relationship and strategy coordination. In addition, awareness has been steadily growing of the importance of taking an holistic view of the strategy phenomenon and examining strategies not just in isolation but as part of an overall picture which includes learning situation, learning target and individual learner characteristics. This article will first of all review the literature and the previous research on these controversial issues, and suggest a workable definition. Then, in order to illustrate the importance of such an holistic view, the results of a small scale study which looks at the strategies used by 16 successful language learners who were all either teaching English or teaching in English at university level will be reported. The quantitative results indicated that these successful learners used many strategies, especially those that suited their goals and their situations; they also frequently used and carefully orchestrated strategy repertoires which suited their own individual needs. The responses of one highly successful respondent were also examined qualitatively. The implications of these findings and the importance of viewing learners holistically are discussed and suggestions are made for ongoing research.
References
Anderson, N. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 133-156. doi: 10.2307/40264514
Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 65, 24-35.
Cohen, A. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Cohen, A., & Aphek, E. (1980). Retention of second language vocabulary over time: Investigating the role of mnemonic associations. System, 8, 221-235.
Cohen, A., & Macaro, E. (2007). Learner strategies.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cotterall, S. (2008). Autonomy and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 110-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46, 545-559.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2010). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 61-74). Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Gao, X. (2007). Has language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. Applied Linguistics, 28, 615-620.
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Language learning strategies: An holistic view
Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (2011). Exploring links between identity, motivation and autonomy. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 1-8). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Green, J., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297. doi: 10.2307/3587625
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383
Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Griffiths, C., Oxford, R., Kawai, Y., Kawai, C., Park, Y., Ma, X., Meng, Y., & Yang, N.(2014). Focus on context: Narratives from East Asia. System, 43, 50-63.
Gu, Y. (2012). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3, 330-356.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Horwitz, E. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333-340.
Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students’ strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117-129.
Irie, K., & Ryan, S. (2015). Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 343-366). Bristol: Multilingual Matters
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kyungsim, H., & Leavell, A. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context, System, 34, 399-415.
Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lo Bianco (2009). Introduction. In J. Lo Bianco, J. Orton, & Y. Gao. (Eds.), China and English: Globalisation and the dilemmas of identity (pp. 1-23). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 9, 320-337.
McLaughlin, B. (1990). “Conscious” versus “unconscious” learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 617-634.
Naiman, N, Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Carol Griffiths, Gökhan Cansiz
Norton, B. (2014). Identity and poststructuralist theory in SLA. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 59-74). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9-31.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-322.
Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (2010). Language, culture and identity: Framing the issues. In D. Nunan & J. Choi (Eds.), Language and culture: Reflective narratives and the emergence of identity, (pp. 1-13), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nyikos, M. (2008). Gender and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 73-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
Oxford, R. (Ed.). (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Crosscultural perspectives. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Oxford, R., & Griffiths, C. (Eds). (2014). Language learning strategy research in the twenty-first century: Insights and innovations [Special issue]. System, 43.
Pavlenko, A., & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English Language Teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 669-680). New York: Springer.
Porte, G. (1988). Poor language learners and their strategies for dealing with new vocabulary. ELT Journal, 42(3), 167-171.
Ranta, L. (2008). Aptitude and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 142-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. (Ed.). (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33, 92-98.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
Language learning strategies: An holistic view
Ryan, S. (2006). Language learning motivation within the context of globalisation: An L2 self within an imagined global community. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3, 23-45.
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2015). Identity and the spoken grammar dilemma. System, 50, 32-42.
Stern, H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 304-318.
Takeuchi, O., Griffiths, C., & Coyle, D. (2007). Applying strategies to contexts: The role of individual, situational and group differences. In A. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies(pp. 69-92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tseng, W., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78-102.
Vann, R., & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 177-198.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, C. (2008). Beliefs and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 121-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winne, P. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.