Keywords
types of ego boundaries
clearly structured course of phonetics
pronunciation attainments
How to Cite
Number of views: 755
Number of downloads: 362
Abstract
The paper reports on a study designed to examine the relationship between the thickness of ego boundaries and attainments in FL pronunciation after a clearly structured form-focused practical course of phonetics. The research involved 45 first-year students of the Institute of English Studies in Wroclaw, Poland, who had attended around thirty 90-minute classes in phonetics. To measure the thickness of their ego boundaries, the Hartmann Boundary Questionnaire (HBQ) was administered. This permitted an examination of which particular types of ego boundaries are related to accuracy in foreign language (FL) pronunciation. The basis for comparing the pronunciation levels of the participants was the Pronunciation Attainment Test consisting of three parts: reading a passage and two vocabulary lists. Attest demonstrated that the differences between the pronunciation levels of the thick and thin ego boundary learners were nonsignificant. However, further statistical analysis (Pearson correlation) showed a positive weak correlation between 3 types of boundaries (represented by Categories 7, 8 and 12 of the HBQ) and attainments in pronunciation. More specifically, the less organized the direct environment (e.g., the working place) of the subjects was and the more preference the participants showed for perceiving and accepting blurred borders between constructs, the better their pronunciation was. A closer look at particular students revealed the importance of boundaries between thoughts and feelings, and boundaries related to defensive mechanisms and to sensitivity in FL pronunciation learning.
References
Baran-Łucarz, M. (2010). The level of ambiguity tolerance and FL pronunciation learning. Report on a pilot study – part two. Anglica Wratislaviensia, XLVIII, 149-162.
Barbuto, J. E., & Plummer, B. A. (1998). Mental boundaries as a new dimension of personality: A comparison of Hartmann’s boundaries in the mind and Jung’s psychological types. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 421-436.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (2000). Teaching pronunciation. A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrman, M. (1993). Ego boundaries revisited: Toward a model of personality and Learning. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 331-362). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Ehrman, M. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ehrman, M. (1999). Ego boundaries and tolerance of ambiguity in second language learning. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 68-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 19, 3-66, London: Hogarth Press.
Guiora, A.(1972). Construct validity and transpositional research: Toward an empirical study of psychoanalytic concepts. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 13(2), 139-150.
Guiora, A., & Acton, W. R. (1979). Personality and language: A restatement. Language Learning, 29, 193-204.
Guiora, A., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Brannon, R. C., Dull, C. Y., & Scovel, T. (1972). The effects of experimentally induced changes in ego states on pronunciation ability in a second language: An exploratory study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 13, 139-150.
Guiora, A., Paluszny, M., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Catford, J., Cooley, R., & Dull, C. (1975). Language and person: studies in language behaviour. Language Learning, 25, 43-61.
Hartmann, E. 1991. Boundaries in mind. A new psychology of personality. New York: Basic Books.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans Green. Reprinted. New York: Washington Square Press, 1983.
Leaver, B. L., Ehrman M., & Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGrew-Hill.
Mortimer, C. (1989). Dramatic monologues for listening comprehension. Re-source materials for listening and fluency practice. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Sand, S., & Levin, R. (1996). Concordance between Hartmann’s Boundary Questionnaire and the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 192-194.
Schumann, J. H. (1975). Affective factors and the problem of age in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 2, 209-235.
Schumann, J. H. (1986). Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingualism and Multicultural Development,7(5), 379-392.
Shams, A. N. (2005). The use of computerized pronunciation practice in the reduction of foreign language classroom anxiety(Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-11092006-171538/unrestricted/Shams_diss_Dec12.pdf
Spielmann, G. & Radnofsky, M. L. (2001). Learning language under tension: New directions from a qualitative study. Modern Language Journal,85, 259-278.
Stevick, E. (1976). Memory, meaning and methods: Some psychological perspectives on language learning.Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Stroud, C., & Lee, W. (2006). Anxiety and identity in the language classroom. RELC Journal, 37(3), 299-307. Retrieved from http://rel.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/37/3/299
Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2011). ‘I am good at speaking, but I failed my phonetics class’ – pronunciation and speaking in advanced learners of English. In M. Pawlak, E. Waniek-Klimczak, & J. Majer (Eds.), Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition(pp. 117-130). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.