Discrimination of Arabic contrasts by American learners
PDF

Keywords

discrimination of sound contrasts
Arabic consonant contrasts
perceptual assimilation model

How to Cite

Al Mahmoud, M. S. (2013). Discrimination of Arabic contrasts by American learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.2.6

Number of views: 593


Number of downloads: 395

Abstract

This article reports on second language perception of non-native contrasts. The study specifically tests the perceptual assimilation model (PAM) by examining American learners’ ability to discriminate Arabic contrasts. Twenty two native American speakers enrolled in a university level Arabic language program took part in a forced choice AXB discrimination task. Results of the study provide partial evidence for PAM. Only two-category contrasts followed straightforwardly from PAM; discrimination results of category-goodness difference and both uncategorizable contrasts yielded partial support, while results of uncategorized versus categorized contrast discrimination provided counter-evidence to PAM.
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.2.6
PDF

References

Al-Ani, S. H. (1970). Arabic phonology. The Hague: Mouton.

Al-Karouri, A. M. (1996). Phonetics of classical Arabic: A selectional study of the problematic sounds. Khartoum University Press: Khartoum.

Amayreh, M. M. (2003). Completion of the consonant inventory of Arabic. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 517-529.

Archibald, J. (1998). Second language phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Atkey, S. (2001). The acquisition of L2 segmental contrasts: English speakers’perception and production of Czech palatal stops (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Calgary, Canada.

Audacity Team. (2008). Audacity (1.2.4) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

Bateson, M. C. (1967). Arabic language handbook. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Beddor, P. S., & Gottfried, T. L. (1995). Methodological issues in crosslanguage speech perception research with adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 207-32). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Best, C. T. (1990). Adult perception of non-native contrasts differing in assimilation to native phonological categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 177-178.

Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: A window on early phonological development. In B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P. Jusczyk, P. MacNeilage, & J. Morton (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year (pp. 289-304). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum

(Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 171-204). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775-794.

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for non-native speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345-360.

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross language perception on approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305-330.

Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.

Eckman, F. (1987). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. In I.Georgette & S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 55-69). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of new and similar phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-65.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). The production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.

Fowler, C. A. (1989). Real objects of speech perception: A commentary on Diehl and Kluender. Ecological Psychology, 1, 145-160.

Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. London: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711-2724.

Halle, P. A., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1999). Phonetic versus phonological influences of French listeners’ perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 281-306.

Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489-503.

Ingham, B. (1971). Some characteristics of Meccan speech. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 34(2), 273-297.

Klatt, H., & Stevens, K. N. (1969). Pharyngeal consonants. Quarterly Progress Report, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 93, 207-216.

Kuhl, P. K. (1993a). Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: Implications for theories of developmental speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 125-139.

Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics. Chicago, IL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Ladefoged, P. (2005). Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Larson-Hall, J. (2004). Predicting perceptual success with segments: A test of Japanese speakers of Russian. Second Language Research, 20(1), 35-80.

Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in pictureword interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-376.

Nagao, K., Lim, B., & de Jong, K. (2003, August). Perceptual acquisitions of nonnative syllable structures by native listeners of Japanese. Poster presented at the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain.

O’Shaughnessy, D. (2000). Speech communications: Human and machine. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

Pilus, Z. (2002). Second-language speech: Production and perception of voicing contrasts in word-final obstruents by Malay speakers of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Polivanov, E. (1931). La perception des sons d’une langue´etrang`ere [The perception of non-native language sounds.]. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 79-96.

Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961-2977.

Rochet, B. L. (1995). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 379-410). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (pp. 337-383). Dordrecht: Foris.

Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 2-45). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 320-335.

Thelwall, R. (1990). Illustrations of the IPA: Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 20(2), 37-41.

Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Principles of phonology (C. A. Baltaxe, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Werker, J. (1986). The effect of multilingualism on phonetic perceptual flexibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 141-156.

Werker, J., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 35-44.

Wright, R. (2004). A Review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yamada, R. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds perception of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 306-320). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1992). The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 376-392.

Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.