Keywords
active and passive voice
reference point model
subject
topic
How to Cite
Number of views: 963
Number of downloads: 604
Abstract
Functionally-oriented linguistic theories, such as cognitive grammar (CG), offer nuanced descriptions of the meanings and uses of grammatical features. A simplified characterization of the semantics of the English active and passive voice grounded in CG terms and based on the reference point model is presented, as it is the basis of the instructional treatment offered to one of the groups in the quasiexperimental study reported in the paper. The study compares the effects of feature- focused grammatical instruction covering the form and meaning/use of the English voices based on CG with those of teaching based on standard pedagogical grammar rules. The results point to relatively high effectiveness of both instructional options in fostering the use of the target structures in both more controlled and more spontaneous performance, with traditional instruction being more successful than that based on CG with respect to the latter. A possible explanation of this superiority is that the subset of the participants (n = 27) exposed to the traditional explanations found them simple and easy to apply, contrary to the situation in the other group.References
Achard, M. (2004). Grammatical instruction in the Natural Approach: A Cognitive Grammar view. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 165-194). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Achard, M. (2008). Teaching construal: Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 432-455). New York: Routledge.
Bielak, J. (2007). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the classroom: Teaching English possessives. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Exploring focus on form in language teaching (Special issue of Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts) (pp. 113-133). Poznań: Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University.
Bielak, J. (2012). Cognitive grammar in the service of teaching linguistic flexibility and creativity. In H. Lankiewicz & E. Wąsikiewicz-Firlej (Eds.), Informed teaching: Premises of modern foreign language pedagogy (pp. 155-173). Piła: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Staszica.
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2011). Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 365-400.
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching English tense and aspect. Heidelberg: Springer.
Bielak, J., Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Testing the meaning and use of grammar: Beyond grammatical accuracy. In Ł. Salski & W. Szubko-Sitarek (Eds.), Perspectives on foreign language learning. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726-755). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97- 113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119-138). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. M., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437-454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
Eastwood, J. (1999). Oxford practice grammar (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31-64). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J, & Reinders, H. (Eds.) (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.
Geeraerts, D. (Ed.) (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Janssen, T., & Redeker, G. (Eds.) (1999). Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Król-Markefka, A. (2010). Metalinguistic knowledge and the accurate use of English articles: The effects of applying Cognitive Grammar in second language teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching (pp. 103-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring.
Boston: Thomson and Heinle.
Liamkina, O., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for making meaning. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 270-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01333.x
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak. M. (2012). Production-oriented and comprehension-based grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg: Springer.
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge: New York.
Niemeier, S., & Reif, M. (2008). Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. In S. de Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 325-356). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pawlak, M. (2012). Variability in the use of implicit knowledge: The effect of task, level and linguistic form. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & L. Piasecka (Eds.),Variability an stability in foreign and second language learning contexts (pp. 279-298). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ray, W. J. (2012). Methods: Toward a science of behavior and experience (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Turewicz, K. (2000). Applicability of Cognitive Grammar as a foundation of pedagogical/reference grammar. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu łódzkiego.
Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456-488). New York: Routledge.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition (pp. 63-105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tyler, A., Mueller, C. M., & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. In J. Littlemore & C. Juchem-Grundmann (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching (AILA Review 23) (pp. 31-49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
White, B. J. (2012) A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 419-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x
Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2013). Using conceptbased instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 17, 363-381. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482950
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.