Abstract
The construct of anxiety has been captivating the interest of SLA researchers for a long time. Numerous observations show that most individuals experience anxiety when learning a foreign language (FL) and using it, both in classroom and real-life contexts, though to a different extent. An analysis of studies conducted on language anxiety (LA) throughout several decades (Horwitz, 2010) shows that researchers have focused, first and foremost, on examining the nature, symptoms and consequences of being anxious, proving its detrimental effect on FL and L2 learning and performance. However, the causes of LA seem to have been less thoroughly explored. The paper reports on a study investigating whether the actual level of FL learners’ pronunciation and the pronunciation level perceived by students can be considered significant sources of anxiety. It is hypothesized that both pronunciation levels are related to LA, with the latter being a more important determinant of LA than the former. To measure the subjects’ degree of anxiety, the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986) was applied. The actual level of pronunciation was diagnosed with the use of a Pronunciation Test, consisting of a Perception Test and two Production Tests (word and passage reading). The perceived pronunciation level of the participants was measured with a questionnaire designed for the purpose of this research. The Pearson moment-correlation proved LA to be significantly correlated with both levels of pronunciation, with the relationship being more meaningful in the case of the perceived FL pronunciation level.
References
Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope’s construct of for-eign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 155-168.
Bailey, K. M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of critical period hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisi-tion (pp. 30-50). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Czajka, E. (2011) The influence of brain dominance on learning English pronun-ciation (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Wrocław.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393-410.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic lan-guage classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 206-220.
Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contribution to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.
Hartmann, E. 1991. Boundaries in mind: A new psychology of personality. New York: Basic Books.
Hilleson, M. (1996). ‘I want to talk with them, but I don’t want them to hear:’ An introspective study of second language anxiety in an English-medium school. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp. 248-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horwitz, E. K. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 559-562.
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126.
Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Research timeline. Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43, 154-167. doi:10.1017/S026144480999036X
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
Horwitz, E. K., & Young, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety: From theory and prac-tice to classroom implications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975-978.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for lan-guage teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and se-cond language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 24-45). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 564-576.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251-275.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994a). The effects of induced anxiety on three stages of cognitive processing in computerized vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 1-17.
McCroskey, J. C. (1970). Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs, 37, 269-277.
McCroskey, J. C., Fayer, J. M., & Richmond, V. P. (1985). Don’t speak to me in English: Communication apprehension in Puerto Rico. Communication Quarterly, 33, 185-192.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Processing time, accent, and compre-hensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38(3), 289-306.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34, 520-531. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., & Daley, C. E. (1999). Factors associated with foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 20, 217-239.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Oxford: Newbury House.
Phillips, E. M. (1992). The effects of language anxiety on student’s oral test performance and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 14-26.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. 2008. Language anxiety in secondary grammar school students. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2010). Perceived teacher support and language anxiety in Polish secondary school EFL learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 83-100.
Price, M. L. (1991). The subjective experience of foreign language anxiety: In-terviews with highly anxious students. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications (pp. 101-108). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Saito, Y., Garza, T. J., & Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 202-218.
Saito, Y., & Samimy, K. K. (1996). Foreign language anxiety and language performance: A study of learner anxiety In beginning, intermediate, and advanced-level college student of Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 239-248.
Sarason, I. G. (1978). The test anxiety scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety: Vol. 5 (pp. 193-216). Ashington, DC: Hemisphere.
Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129-142.
Shams, A. N. (2005). The use of computerized pronunciation practice in the reduction of foreign language classroom anxiety (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-11092006-171538/unrestricted/Shams_diss_Dec12.pdf
Sparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native aptitude differences? The Modern Language Journal, 75, 3-16.
Spielberger, C. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-FORM Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Stroud, C., & Wee, L. (2006). Anxiety and identity in the language classroom. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 37, 299-307. doi:
1177/0033688206071311
Swagler, M. A., & Ellis, M. V. (2003). Crossing the distance: Adjustment of Tai-wanese graduate students in the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 420-437.
VanPatten, B., & Glass, W. R. (1999). Grammar learning as a source of language anxiety: A discussion. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 89-105). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448-457.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 37, 308-328. doi: 10.1177/0033688206071315
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does the anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75, 426-439.
Young, D. J. (1992). Language anxiety from the foreign language specialist’s perspective: Interviews with Krashen, Omaggio Hadley, Terrell, and Rardin. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 157-172.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.