What is your educational philosophy? Modern and postmodern approaches to foreign language education
PDF

Keywords

philosophy of education
foreign language education
teaching versus learning
education versus training
postmodern approaches to education

How to Cite

Uzun, L. (2012). What is your educational philosophy? Modern and postmodern approaches to foreign language education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.4

Number of views: 753


Number of downloads: 425

Abstract

The present study discusses the concepts of education and training, while also highlighting the paradigm wars of the positivistic and naturalistic views, beginning with the age of ancient philosophies and continuing to the latest era of postmodernism. Additionally, language education is examined considering the linguistic and educational fundamentals which all need to be based on and combined by a philosophy. The research in foreign language (FL) education is evaluated from both the teaching and learning perspectives in order to reach conclusions concerning the current situation and the requisites of futuristic and innovative FL education. What is my educational philosophy? is proposed as a key question that not only FL teachers but also all educators should ask themselves; a question that will guide teachers throughout their entire lives and illuminate their minds throughout their teaching practice. Teacher and learner roles are discussed in order to determine whether teachers or learners should come first in the process of education. It is emphasised that the philosophical perspectives of education urgently need to be built into the minds of educators prior to asking them to convey knowledge of any kind or to apply the materials of a specific teaching method. The study concludes with the observation that there exists a serious discrepancy between the needs, preferences and interests of the learners and the views held by educational decision makers, who seem to fail to catch up with the trends in technology and globalisation.
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.4
PDF

References

Ahmad, N., Britland, M., Bull, S., & Mabbott, A. (2010). A role for open learner models in formative assessment: Support from studies with editable learner models. Proceedings of Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment, EC-TEL 2010. Retrieved from http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/bull/

Anderson, G. L. & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-21.

Best, J. W. & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education. New York: Pearson Education.

Cahn, S. M. (1997). Classic and contemporary readings in the philosophy of education. New York: McGraw Hill.

Cayci, B. & Ünal, E. (2007). Sinif Öğretmeni Adaylarının Sahip Oldukları Öğrenme Stillerinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Üniversite ve Toplum, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://www.universite-toplum.org/text.php3?id=328

Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., & Liu, C. C. (2011). Effects of matching teaching strategy to thinking style on learner's quality of reflection in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 53-64.

Demirel, Ö. (1999). Planlamadan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Deniz, M., Avsaroglu, S. & Fidan, Ö. (2006). Ingilizce ögretmenlerinin öğrencileri motive etme düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Inönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 61-73.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: McMillan.

Dilekman, M., Basci, Z., & Bektas, F. (2008). Egitim fakültesi ögrencilerinin iletisim becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 223-231.

Erturk, S. (1985). Egitimde Program Gelistirme. Meteksan Yayinlari, Ankara.

Farrell, T. S. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Grzega, J. & Schöner, M. (2008). The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 167-175.

Hatton, N. & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Toward definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.

Hsieh, S. W., Jang, Y. R., Hwang, G. J. & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194-1201.

Kocoglu, Z., Akyel, A., & Ercetin G. (2008). Pen/paper and electronic portfolios: An effective tool for developing reflective thinking of Turkish EFL student teachers? Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 13(1), 1-24.

Mansfield, K. (1920). Pictures. In K. Mansfield, Bliss, and Other Stories (pp. 157-171). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Neil, J. (2005). John Dewey, the modern father of experiential education. Retrieved on 18 March 2012 from http://wilderdom.com/experiential/ExperientialDewey.html

Orr, M. (2011). Learning to teach English as a foreign language in Lebanon. Near and Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education, 2, 1-14.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital ımmigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.