Abstract
The present study discusses the concepts of education and training, while also highlighting the paradigm wars of the positivistic and naturalistic views, beginning with the age of ancient philosophies and continuing to the latest era of postmodernism. Additionally, language education is examined considering the linguistic and educational fundamentals which all need to be based on and combined by a philosophy. The research in foreign language (FL) education is evaluated from both the teaching and learning perspectives in order to reach conclusions concerning the current situation and the requisites of futuristic and innovative FL education. What is my educational philosophy? is proposed as a key question that not only FL teachers but also all educators should ask themselves; a question that will guide teachers throughout their entire lives and illuminate their minds throughout their teaching practice. Teacher and learner roles are discussed in order to determine whether teachers or learners should come first in the process of education. It is emphasised that the philosophical perspectives of education urgently need to be built into the minds of educators prior to asking them to convey knowledge of any kind or to apply the materials of a specific teaching method. The study concludes with the observation that there exists a serious discrepancy between the needs, preferences and interests of the learners and the views held by educational decision makers, who seem to fail to catch up with the trends in technology and globalisation.References
Ahmad, N., Britland, M., Bull, S., & Mabbott, A. (2010). A role for open learner models in formative assessment: Support from studies with editable learner models. Proceedings of Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment, EC-TEL 2010. Retrieved from http://www.eee.bham.ac.uk/bull/
Anderson, G. L. & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-21.
Best, J. W. & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education. New York: Pearson Education.
Cahn, S. M. (1997). Classic and contemporary readings in the philosophy of education. New York: McGraw Hill.
Cayci, B. & Ünal, E. (2007). Sinif Öğretmeni Adaylarının Sahip Oldukları Öğrenme Stillerinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Üniversite ve Toplum, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://www.universite-toplum.org/text.php3?id=328
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., & Liu, C. C. (2011). Effects of matching teaching strategy to thinking style on learner's quality of reflection in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 53-64.
Demirel, Ö. (1999). Planlamadan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Deniz, M., Avsaroglu, S. & Fidan, Ö. (2006). Ingilizce ögretmenlerinin öğrencileri motive etme düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Inönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 61-73.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: McMillan.
Dilekman, M., Basci, Z., & Bektas, F. (2008). Egitim fakültesi ögrencilerinin iletisim becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2), 223-231.
Erturk, S. (1985). Egitimde Program Gelistirme. Meteksan Yayinlari, Ankara.
Farrell, T. S. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Grzega, J. & Schöner, M. (2008). The didactic model LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a way of preparing students for communication in a knowledge society. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 167-175.
Hatton, N. & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Toward definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
Hsieh, S. W., Jang, Y. R., Hwang, G. J. & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194-1201.
Kocoglu, Z., Akyel, A., & Ercetin G. (2008). Pen/paper and electronic portfolios: An effective tool for developing reflective thinking of Turkish EFL student teachers? Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 13(1), 1-24.
Mansfield, K. (1920). Pictures. In K. Mansfield, Bliss, and Other Stories (pp. 157-171). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Neil, J. (2005). John Dewey, the modern father of experiential education. Retrieved on 18 March 2012 from http://wilderdom.com/experiential/ExperientialDewey.html
Orr, M. (2011). Learning to teach English as a foreign language in Lebanon. Near and Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education, 2, 1-14.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital ımmigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.