Keywords
complexity theory
learner autonomy
errors/innovations
How to Cite
Number of views: 917
Number of downloads: 546
Abstract
The general trend in language education over the years has been to ascribe to language learners increasing power and responsibility for their own learning. While this is commendable, the autonomy of learners is still constrained by views of language that see learners as being mere “hosts” of another’s language. Such views restrict learners to roles as language learners who make errors not language users who innovate. This article argues for a more enlightened view of language and of learners, one inspired by a complexity theory perspective. It also proposes that such a perspective is respectful of learner agency.References
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 169-188.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2007). The ecology of global English. International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(2), 89-100.
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity. London: Routledge.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners` errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-169.
Cullinan, D. (2011). Spanish voices. Raleigh: North Carolina Language and Life Project.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21 and 51-5.
Dulay, H., & Burt, K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 95-123.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1).
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Garcia, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 128-145). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.
Hatch, E. (1974). Second language learning – universals? Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, 1-7.
Holme, R. (2010). Construction grammars: Towards a pedagogical model. AILA Review: Applied Cognitive Linguistics in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 23, 115-133.
Kroskrity, P. V. (2004). Language ideologies. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Malden: Blackwell.
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 249-252.
Kramsch, C. (2009). Third culture and language education. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics: Vol. 1. Language teaching and learning (pp. 233-254). London: Continuum.
Kretzschmar, W. (2009). The linguistics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-65.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z-H. Han and T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189-200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-619.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Makoni, B., & Makoni, S. (2010). Multilingual discourses on wheels and public English in Africa. A case for vague linguistique. In J. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English language studies (pp. 258-270). Abingdon: Routledge
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2005). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal, 2(3), 137-156.
Mitchell, S. D. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.) (2004). Critical pedagogy and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osberg, D. (2007, April). The logic of emergence: A new hope for critical education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. Harlow: Longman.
Schumann, J. (1978). The relationship of pidiginization, creolization, and decreolization in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 28(2), 367-379.
Schumann, J. (1999). A neurobiological basis for decision making in language pragmatics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 7, 283-311.
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities. World Englishes, 28(2), 236-245.
Seliger, H. (1977). Does practice make perfect? A study of interaction pattern and L2 competence. Language Learning, 27(2), 263-278.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Toolan, M. (2003). An integrational linguistic view. In J. Leather & J. van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 123-139). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wolfram, W., Carter, P., & Moriello, B. (2004). Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 339-358.
Wolfram, W., Kohn, M., & Callahan-Price, E. (2011). Southern-bred Hispanic English: An emerging variety. In J. Michnowitz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Cascadilla: Selected proceedings of the 5th workshop on Spanish sociolinguistics, 5, 1-13.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.