Perspectives of Civic Upbringing as in Non formal Education
PDF (English)

Słowa kluczowe

civic education/upbringing
competences of the XXI century
nonformal education
after-school education
out-of-school education

Jak cytować

YEHOROVA, O. (2019). Perspectives of Civic Upbringing as in Non formal Education. Interdyscyplinarne Konteksty Pedagogiki Specjalnej, (21), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2018.21.16

Abstrakt

The article covers the theoretical aspects and importance of civic education in its broad sense nowadays and analyzes its role, tasks, the after-school programs, best experiences and practices of after-school education in the United States in the field of civic education and upbringing. In the article civic education in the framework of U.S. out-of-school time is substantiated as a systematic object in its substantive and procedural aspects, which aims to form national, universal human values, civic activity and competencies required in the XXI century. It has been established that civic education and upbringing has been integrated in the secondary school and out-of-school education curriculum and practice, is considered as a priority task for education at the present stage in the United States and is a perspective area for nonformal education in Ukraine and beyond.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2018.21.16
PDF (English)

Bibliografia

The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement / A Cruci-ble Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future // Association of Ame-rican Colleges and Universities. – Washington D. C., 2012. – 98 p.

Gould J. Guardians of Democracy: The Civic Mission of Schools / J. Gould // Phil-adelhia: Lenore Annerberg Institute of Civics of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools. – Philadelhia, 2011. – 159 р.

Advancing Civic Learning and Engagement in Democracy: А Road Map and Call to Action / U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Office of Postsecondary Education. – Washington D. C., 2012. – 40p.

Popadyuk K. Specificity of the adaptation of the American information in the sphere of civic education and upbrining/ K. Popadyuk // Actual problems of civic education and upbrining: Ukrainian and foreign experiences: materials of the I scientific and practical conference, 19 June 2013. / National. Univ. „Ostrozka Akademia”, non-governmental organization „Center for Democratic Leader-ship”; [Відп. Ed. O. S. Batishcheva]. – Ostrog, 2013. – 234 p.

Popadyuk K. The formation of the civic education in Ukraine. A glance at the prob-lem / K. Popadyuk; N.Vyatkina // Implementation of western experienes in school system of Ukraine. – K. Abris, 2002. – 184 p.

Bauer O. The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy / O. Bauer // Uni-versity of Minnesota Press. – Minneapolis–London, 2000. – 489 р.

The Mikva Model, http://www.mikvachallenge.org [access: 09.2016].

National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), http://www.socialstudies.org/ about [access: 09.2016].

Duncan A., O’Connor S. Civics Education, from http://www.thedailybeast.com/ articles/2011/07/01/icivics-sandra-day-o-connor-and-arne-duncan-on-civics-education-online.html [access: 09.2016].

Ponomarenko L. Mental’nist yaderni tsinnosti ta philosophia osvity v Ukrayini s SshA / L. Ponomarenko // Аmerykanska philosophia osvity ochyma ukrayin-skykh doslidnykiv / Materialy Vseukrayinskoyi naukovo-practychnoyi confer-entsiyi 22 hrudnya 2005. – Poltava: POIPPO, 2005. – pp. 142-148.

Sukhina В., Shaparenko О. Pro dosvid SShA u horomadyanskomu vykhovanni / В. Sukhina, О. Shaparenko // Аmerykanska philosophia osvity ochyma ukrayin-skykh doslidnykiv / Materialy Vseukrayinskoyi naukovo-practychnoyi confer-entsiyi 22 hrudnya 2005. – Poltava: POIPPO, 2005. – pp. 187-193.

Ischenko Y. Philosofsky analiz pytan adaptatsiyi zakordonnoho osvityanskoho dos-vidu // Antolohiya adaptovanoho dosvidu abo dlya choho isnuyut program osvitnikh obminiv. – Rivne, 2004. – pp. 9–14.

Mеgyery K. History of the Service-Learning It Requirement in Maryland. – Univer-sity of Nebraska Omaha, 1997. – 5 р.

The Nation’s Report Card / History, Geography, and Civics at Grade. – 2015, https:// nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/commissioner/remarks2015/04_29_2015.asp [access: 09.2016].

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), https://nces.ed.gov/ nationsreportcard [access: 09.2016].

Yehorova O. Hromadyanske vykhovannya yak spetsialnyi napryam pozashkilnoyi osvity // Pedahohichni nauky Shidnoyevropeiskoho natsionalnoho universyte-tu imeni Lesi Ukrayinky. zb. nauk. st. – Lutsk, 2017. –Seriia 2 (351). – pp. 8-14.

The Network For Teaching Entrepreneurship, https://www.nfte.com [access: 09.2016]. Public Achievement project, http://www.augsburg.edu/sabo/what-we-do/publi cachievement [access: 09.2016].

ICivics, https://www.icivics.org/our-story [access: 09.2016].

Teaching History, http://teachinghistory.org/digital-classroom/tech-for-teachers/ 25813 [access: 01.2017].

Batishcheva S. Povedinkovi aspekty ta rozbizhnosti u tsinnostyakh: analiz stanu hromadyanskoyi svidomosti u Ukrayinskoyi molodi. http://eprints.oa.edu.ua/ 2368 [access: 01.2017].

Nova Doba, http://www.novadoba.org.ua [access: 11.2017].

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), https://nces.ed.gov/ nationsreportcard [access: 9.01.2017].

Constitution Day,http://www2.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/constitutionday.html [access: 01.2017].

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.