Abstrakt
The aim of the paper is to reconstruct the argumentational structure of formal inquiry on chosen example. It also attempts to assess the validity of every identified part of argumentations. This assessment is done by the use of notions and methods postulated by Tokarz (2006) for formalization and judgment of argumentation. As a result, proposal of general structure of argumentation and structure of every subarguments used in analyzed text is presented.Bibliografia
Blair, J. A. (1992). Everyday Argumentation from Informal Logic Perspective. In W. L. Benoit, D. Hample, & P. J. Benoit, Readings in argumentation. (pp. 357-378). New York: Fortis Publications.
Govier, T. (2010). A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont: Cengage Learning.
Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht: Fortis Publications Holland.
Searle, J. R. (1987). Czynności mowy. Rozważania z filozofii języka. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax.
Szymanek, K. (2001). Sztuka argumentacji: słownik terminologiczny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Tokarz, M. (2006). Argumentacja. Perswazja. Manipulacja. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.